Cory Santos

Interesting interview. https://www.foxla.com/video/1397940

Perhaps this is what you are referring to? https://www.universalroyaltyco.com/john-f-kennedy-texas-oil/

Correct he was not there at that time and the photos are not of him. He was there the night before and early that morning which is nothing more than what I have written about being a “strange coincidence”.

Again, I know this already so no I do not need to do anything. What you need to do, respectfully, is provide proof that it was him instead of just your opinion.

Thank you Leslie. I do not think DVP knew he was in Dallas. David did you know this?

Please explain how in your mind Pres. Bush benefitted from the JFK assassination. Btw actor Bill Paxton was there that day and he later starred in Terminator, Aliens, and Twister but died young. Did he also benefit from the assassination and then get silenced? This is all indeed merely a coincidence and nonsense to suggest it is not without any proof other than them being in Dallas. Again, I believe Jim D did not think highly of Baker’s book so I am not sure why it is being cited as indisputable authority here.

And he was asked about it and it was looked into. It is not the same Bush. There is zero evidence it was. If there was please share.

Thank you but I have heard these points before. I have yet to see evidence of anything. Just people’s opinions and interpretations of the above. What you call “suspicious” I call a coincidence. If you think former Pres. Bush was in the CIA prior to 1976 then prove it with evidence, not “well he was associated with X and X was in the CIA so….” Associations like that are not proof. Moreover, I think, though could be wrong, did not Jim DiEugenio give Baker’s book a bad review?

But former Pres. Bush was in Dallas the night before and the morning of 11-22-63 (this is a mere innocent strange coincidence which means nothing.) Then he went to Tyler for his speech earlier on the morning of 11-22-63. As for the article it was the Dallas news and I believe the article addresses the Pres. Ford visit.

Dallas morning news article I thought addressed this. Also, coincidence? Lol, I think not. https://bushofficial.com/tour_moreinfo&event_id=144233665&site_id=bush2020

No it’s fine.

I am surprised you did not know this https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2023/11/22/since-jfk-assassination-no-us-president-has-visited-dallas-dealey-plaza/?outputType=amp https://www.nixonfoundation.org/2013/11/richard-nixon-november-22-1963/

You posted that letter and did not note that he had, though innocently, been in Dallas that morning before going to Tyler. Your post makes it look like he was never in Dallas. You know better as to where he was but some people might come on here and not know this. Context and perspective are important don’t you think?

He was not because he had nothing to do with it and no one has any evidence that he did.

Then why did you post disinformation?

What time were they killed approximately?

Reiner just addressed this on the 11th episode by explaining how Biden’s administration really is the reason the records will never be seen by the public.

Don’t forget the wedding ring Joe. There is no way Oswald had no clue.

Your response avoided my question and point but okay.

I never made that claim. Please do not attribute words to me which I did not state. Clearly, you have a bias against psychology. I assume perhaps psychiatry and sociology as well?

Well there is more to it than just childhood trauma and yes, childhood trauma can cause a disposition towards criminal choices as an adult. Let me find that article for you to read. QUOTE Professional Psychology is equally as stupid as armchair psychology. You shouldn't listen to anything these "professionals" claim. Weren't they doing labotomies then? Micah Mileto END QUOTE Micah, please tell us more. What is your basis for such an observation?

Joe, you bring up a good point. Twenty plus years ago during law school I spent two years researching and drafting a paper on Jim Garrison. During that research I came across an interesting article in academia regarding LHO. Basically, it was a psychological and sociological analysis of Oswald and his environment. The author determined Oswald was a ghost in the machine, shuttered from broken home to foster home with no father as a role model, Oswald was the result of a broken American system that allowed him to fall through the cracks. I cannot recall the article but I will look it up for you.

I agree. Moreover, I simply cannot explain this any more elementary. These are two distinct legal issues.

I think what many people are missing is that while President Trump failed to release all the documents the truth is the door was still open for disclosure under his actions. President Biden, however, effectively shut the door by his actions. He therefore went beyond merely not releasing records temporarily as he actually made the decision not to release the records permanent. This is the legal distinction Ben is trying to make which most people here are failing to understand because they interpret it wrongly as a political attack. Closing the records off from further disclosure is a distinct legal issue from failing to disclose the records pending further review. Both of these legal issues appear to be under litigation. Whether the Act allows for either scenario is interesting as there are credible arguments on both sides.

Not even close plus to being blown out like in past years. Plus, do not forget the evolved focus of the interviews, which you and others like Morley participated, which drew attention to the facts and away from the Warren omission nonsense. Also RFK, Jr. making comments certainly has changed the landscape also. Podcasts have truly evolved the debate and interested younger people. I think that if there is an actual presidential debate this year, which might be doubtful and wishful thinking co side ring how things seem to be going with the DNC, and if RFK is included in the debates, let’s see if anyone asks the million dollar question.