Keyvan Shahrdar

Keven, you have been BRAINWASHED and the only person to blame is yourself. BTW - The only reason I become unresponsive to your posts is because they are way too long and filled with lies and gibberish and I just don't want to spend the time to have a discussion with a habitual agent of misinformation. Why have you been brainwashed? I know you are smart. You are a lawyer after all. Why did you let yourself get brainwashed this way? What am I thinking, you researched all this information yourself, your probably purchased books about the JFK assassination from authors whose sole intent is to make money from you. These authors will write anything to make a buck and you have decided of your own free will to get brainwashed with their hogwash. All you have to do is look at the medical evidence, the Zapruder film, and the Nix film, the Marie Muchmore film, and the Mary Moorman photo. Look at the x-rays, they were taken before JFK got cut up by the pathologists. But you wont, because you are BRAINWASHED and all you have are these long posts full of conjecture from wayward authors.

You should have a conversation with it. I can see how watching it is difficult because the factual evidence in it contradicts everything you have been brainwashed and duped to believe by these wayward authors.

So Sandy, I would love to hear the discussion that you have with the Nix film study.

Sandy and Keven, I know you guys are bright intellectuals, I find it hard to believe that you guys choose to believe anything that anyone writes as fact. I am a math and logic person, that is with what I deal with every day running a silicon valley technology company. Nothing you guys say match up with what you see in film, autopsy photographs and x-rays. In the same breath both of you discount the film, autopsy photographs, and x-rays as fake and then use them to try to make a point of where the fragment came from or where the shots came from. Come on! There is nothing you can post to make me believe these narratives over the facts shown in the film, autopsy photographs, and x-rays. There is nothing you can say that could make me question the authenticity of them. Look at the junk spewed by Mantik, the x-rays are fake but they show where the shots came from. This is ridiculous at best. This keystone cops scenarios that you guys are spewing reminds me of the wrap up smear by Nancy Pelosi. This is what those authors are doing in the JFK assassination community.

You'd be disbarred out of law regurgitating your long disjointed narratives of a mantra...

I appreciate your call for direct evidence amidst the sea of narratives surrounding the JFK assassination. It's clear that you value a narrative over succinctness and factual clarity. Let's address your points with the existing evidence and without diving too deep into interpretative narratives: Harper Fragment: It's just a fragment. Dr. Mantik and others have interpreted its origin based on its composition and location found, but without comprehensive and incontrovertible proof, we must remain open to different interpretations. X-Rays: The claim about the x-rays being altered stems from analyses like those by Dr. Mantik, who pointed out inconsistencies in their optical density and structure. However, these are professional interpretations of the evidence, not indisputable facts. The authenticity of the x-rays is supported by the majority of forensic experts. Zapruder Film: This film is one of the most scrutinized pieces of evidence. Claims of alteration come from discrepancies observed by researchers. However, no concrete proof has surfaced that definitively proves the film was altered. This film, alongside others like the Nix film and the Moorman photo, has been validated by multiple investigations to have no alterations that impact the understanding of the sequence of events. Your narratives need an emphasis on sticking to the facts is crucial, and so is recognizing that some aspects of this case involve interpretation of evidence, where different experts might disagree. While we may not convince each other of a different viewpoint, it's important to discuss these matters respectfully and consider all evidence critically, whether it supports or challenges our views.

Sorry Keven! You can say what ever you want but: Narrative is Narrative, Gibberish is Gibberish, and Fact is Fact.

I know that Mantik's book completely destroys your long lengthy narratives, that by the way, I will never read. It is all gibberish to me. Read the book title in Amazon, I know you will be in disbelieve, but try to accept fact, it won't hurt you any. Facts over narrative, always! https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-President-John-Kennedy-Headshots/dp/B0CXLN1PX1/ref=sr_1_1?crid=OSSD8OIODJU3&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.kEFknrS7GKRmvDrwf88iSMPrN9dDnphPzgrJOVcyh0GLPv14r8SXEmIEIZ0pjn5wB_j5S8Lzs9s-JN4mZUuvmlyi85nI_tjZ8FDAvvNwriyeKqsMsT2ybVCh-EaFLGVaaCoUrM25WnDxu-UO1yxZgKqfQHZ87zpwipNP4RWRRtSmuYasfJ-KfqiW9ZWBXcw4RJotmsUjDeHk7t6fe7tUw-eYnUp-ctNbNW8MsowOv54.Gh72b770Lqx4iphdqp_qmriOCED8jcflpXP_6WdHBus&dib_tag=se&keywords=book+mantik&qid=1713567986&sprefix=book+mantik%2Caps%2C95&sr=8-1

David W. Mantik's Earlier Beliefs: Frontal Shots: Mantik strongly argued that forensic evidence supported shots to JFK's head from the front. This was primarily based on his detailed analysis of the Zapruder film and autopsy records. X-ray Manipulation: He believed that the X-rays of JFK's head were altered to support the single-gunman theory. Mantik suggested that inconsistencies in the optical densities indicated manipulation, aimed at obscuring evidence of frontal shots. Beliefs in "The Final Analysis": Multiple Headshots: In his 2024 book, co-authored with Jerome Corsi, Mantik presents forensic evidence that JFK was hit by two headshots from the right front and one from the rear, indicating multiple shooters. Forensic Collaboration: This new book includes collaborative forensic analysis, likely integrating more modern techniques or reevaluated evidence to support claims of shots from multiple directions.

@Keven Hofeling I guess you can't reference Mantik on your lengthy narratives any more. Mantik seems to have seen the light of day and started to write factual data. I am so sorry for you loss of citation.

I agree, since I like reading your posts Kevin, the shorter they are the better. But I would not expect short posts from a lawyer!

You are awesome! You just created a narrative for a narrative. You are a good lawyer! But the basic tenet holds true: fact takes precedence over narrative. Sorry, Kevin!

Documentary Evidence (Fact) vs. Testimonial Evidence (Narrative) Tangible, unaltered representation of a fact (e.g., The Nix Film) versus testimonial evidence fraught with biases, perceptions, and memory issues (e.g., accounts from wayward doctors and people with a narrative). Who wins? The Nix Film! All the narrative in the world that is posted does not beat fact! Sorry Kevin!

Narrative never trumps fact!

FWIW - Fight the battle, never give up!

There is only one way to interpret the X-ray of JFK's skull. No other way, period. You guys are making up alternative facts to fit your narrative. Fact is fact! When a bullet enter a skull, the bullet will create concentric radial lines on the skull from the point of entry. That is why JFK's skull x-ray looks the way it looks. He was shot in the back of his head, you can see the entry in the circle, generating the concentric radial lines toward the front of the skull. [1] "...Although multiple gunshot wounds of the skull are much more difficult to analyze than wounds from blunt-force wounds, the pattern of radial fracture lines sometimes allows the determination of the sequence of the shots. If a fracture related to an entrance hole passes another entrance hole and is not terminated, the entrance hole causing that fracture must have been inflicted first." Then a couple of seconds later, he was hit by a bullet from the right side causing a tangential injury from right to left entering above his ear and exiting the top of the head [2]. There is no other way to interpret this x-ray. You may want to make it fit your narrative, but as I always say, fact is fact and narrative is narrative and you guys are full of narratives without any basis of fact. People can testify all they want, they can say a bullet entered the front of JFK's head all they want, but facts don't change no matter what anyone says, wrote 60 years ago, or testified to. Facts are facts! Reference: [1] U.S. Department of Justine: Justice Program - Determination of the Sequence of Gunshot Wounds of the Skull [2] Anglin D, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage associated with tangential gunshot wounds to the head - Tangential Gun-Shot Wound to the Head: A Serious Injury Pat Speer image from his website:

NO Sandy!

During the interrogation of Buell Wesley Frazier on the day of President John F. Kennedy's assassination, the interrogation was abruptly halted. Frazier, who worked at the Texas School Book Depository and was a colleague of Lee Harvey Oswald, had driven Oswald to work on the morning of November 22, 1963. Because of his connection to Oswald and the fact that he had given Oswald a ride that day, Frazier was brought in for questioning by the Dallas police. The interruption occurred because a Secret Service agent, Forrest Sorrels, intervened. Sorrels was the Special Agent in charge of the Dallas office of the Secret Service at the time of the assassination. Recognizing the importance of the situation and possibly to coordinate the interrogation efforts more effectively amidst the chaos of the day, Sorrels instructed the Dallas police to stop questioning Frazier. The exact motivations behind Sorrels' intervention might have been related to concerns about the interrogation methods, the need for federal oversight given the assassination of the President, or the desire to ensure that the investigation was conducted in a manner that preserved critical information and evidence. This moment underscores the intense and chaotic atmosphere that enveloped Dallas law enforcement and federal agencies in the immediate aftermath of the assassination, as they scrambled to gather information and understand the events that had unfolded. Frazier, who maintained his innocence and was never charged in connection with the assassination, provided significant information about Oswald's actions on the morning of November 22, further contributing to the investigation.

Marvin Wise had cotton in his ears. He told the FBI that the cotton was there because he had an ear infection. The reality of the 60's is that shooters would put cotton in their ears to muffle the gun shot. If you have ever shot a gun, you know how loud the report is. What intrigues me the most is how L Fletcher Prouty figured all of this out, happens to be out of the country when the assassination occurs, and knows Edward Lansdale, yet he was not involved in the assassination in any way!

This photograph of Lansdale walking among the hit team says one thousand words. 1. The Tramps - Harold Doyle, Gus Abrams, and John Gedney know Lansdale. How did Lansdale recruit them? Where they Mercenaries? 2. Lansdale knows the Tramps. 3. Lansdale gets alerted by monitoring the DPD radio that the tramps were arrested after the Rail Yard intendant notified the police he saw three people running and entering a train car. 4. There must have been a command center where Lansdale was monitoring the assassination. Where? What building? From a car? When somebody decides to investigate the Tramps in-depth, we will know this aspect of the assassination. What else does the picture of the Tramps with Lansdale say?

The Single Bullet Theory (SBT) was not originally conceived to explain the number of shots fired by Oswald. Rather, it seems to have been crafted to shift focus away from a pivotal detail: the timing of the shot that struck Governor Connally, which was not only later than officially reported but also, it appears, intended for Bill Greer, the driver. Greer's decision to intentionally slow down the car placed him unwittingly at the center of a plot aimed at eliminating co-conspirators and creating turmoil on Elm Street. The sequence of events could have been simply explained by three shots — one hitting JFK in the back, a second wounding Connally, followed by a final headshot to JFK. However, the actual sequence appears to be more complex: JFK first received a throat shot from the pergola, then a shot to his back, followed by one to the back of his head, and another to the right side of his head originating from the pergola. Subsequently, Connally was shot, an event captured by both the Nix and Zapruder films, which show a sudden downward movement at the moment of impact. Finally, a shot struck the front chrome of the windshield, again from the pergola. Interestingly, Connally moved into the direct line of fire between the gunmen and Greer, a move he made inadvertently as he shifted away from his wife in an attempt to lower himself in the limousine.

I neglected to mention that as you drive along Elm Street through Dealey Plaza, you'll find yourself descending a slope. The car naturally gains momentum, continuously rolling downhill, which necessitates deliberately applying the brakes to moderate your speed.

I am staying at a hotel on Elm St for work and everyday I pass through Dealey Plaza. Today, Saturday January 13,2024 I decided to slow my car down to about 10 mph while passing next to the pergola while driving through Dealey Plaza. I even turned my head to look at my back seat twice. if you do this, you will see how evident it is that Bill Greer slowed the car down on purpose so JFK’s head could get blown off.

Kevin, do you think this is the best approach to take? We are here to discuss and debate, not to pit one another against each other.

It's important to emphasize that regardless of opinions or statements, facts remain facts. It seems that in this discussion, there are individuals who prefer narratives over factual evidence. Interestingly, some contradict themselves by alleging alterations in the Zapruder film, autopsy images, and X-rays by the government, and then paradoxically cite government officials to support their narrative. It's quite astonishing. I recommend viewing the Nix Film below, which clearly illustrates the events surrounding JFK's assassination and the manner of his injury. This is not about crafting a story, but rather presenting undeniable evidence and facts. My objective is to encourage people to focus on factual information rather than getting swayed by narratives.