Gaby Stan

I have erased my thoughts about the facial features of Larrie Schmidt on grounds of personal bias. But after reading this thread on CUSA I decided to express them anyway: Larrie Schmidt seems to me as having the appearance of a ruthless nazi or KKK member prepared to do anything for achieving his goal (power and money). And it matches the exact same opinion I have about Lyndon Baines Johnson. We can read much from a man’s face, can’t we? Cheers, Gaby

Paul Trejo, no offence, but you really sound like being Larrie Schmidt’s defence attorney... In this video – also posted by Greg Parker in this thread – it is clearly visible that „lady” dropped her picket sign voluntarily on Adlai Stevenson’s head and was pushed away AFTER her ugly deed. Please do not try making us believe Larrie Schmidt was a lamb that was skinned alive, because he was clearly mean and ugly. If he has ANY remorse for what he did, he would come forward accepting his wrongdoings, repent and appologize for them. Denial means he is just covering his butt. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWXoAPMcVrE (6.3) Nor was Adlai the perfect gentleman throughout the entire roasting, since his chauffer reported that Adlai shouted, "animals! animals!" while driving away in his limousine. – I suspect you expect a “perfect gentleman” to refer to the violent protesters as “ true patriotic citizens” or “such lovely humans”. While they obviously acted as wild animals – at most primates. And in a different thread you stated that: In Dick Russell's influential book, The Man Who Knew Too Much (1992, 2003), his few pages on Larrie Schmidt, using memoirs from Bradford P. Angers, differs in his two editions. In his 1992 edition Bradford P.Angers suggests that Robbie Schmidt joined Oswald to shoot at Walker on 10 April 1963. In his 2003 edition, Bradford P.Angers suggests that Larrie Schmidt joined Oswald to shoot at Walker on 10 April 1963. Which is TOTALLY false. I am reading NOW Dick Russell’s book (2003 edition) and is just a couple of days ago I have reached the part where Angers states that BOTH Larrie and Bob Schmidt were drinking with Oswald and... no, I will place a picture of that story instead, so you cannot argue what I say: And, by the way, I am absolutely sure what Bradford P. Angers said about Schmidt was true. Why lie about this? What was his gain? Why someone put his own life in danger by making up a story with SS agents beating up someone to silence him about the JFK assassination just for fun??? You state Larrie Schmidt told you he first met Angers in 1964, not 1963, “as Dick Russell's report of Angers allegation implies”. Well, Dick Russell states that H. L. Hunt told Angers he’ll be sending a man over to him for work “several weeks after the assassination”. By several I suspect he meant a bit more than the remaining 5 and a half weeks remaining of the year 1963 (there is a slight but very significant difference between several and few, in my opinion – 5 being a few and several meaning just a bit more than 5, probably 6 or 7, since if there were 8 or more Angers probably would have refered to them being “a couple of month after the assassination”). So please allow us to draw our own conclusion about that time frame, which is more probable to be early 1964 and not late 1963 – think of it as being even less probable to send someone for work just prior or during Christmas and New Year holidays. A witty person will not buy your allegations discrediting Dick Russell – or Bradford P. Angers, for that matter –, Sir! Regarding the LOOK magazine article on Larrie Schmidt: THANK YOU for providing us the copy of it! It is good propaganda, I have to admit! :-) I find very interesting the fact that the black-bordered ad was so fruitful to Schmidt’s future employment, although it had nothing to do with the assassination – pure coincidence. I suspect it is a possibility that the scheme of shooting at ex-gen. Walker was a setup to implicate Oswald and, in reality, the Schmidt brothers worked hand in hand with Walker beginning in Germany and they only fabricated the evidence of being against Walker both in Germany and afterwards in Dallas, in order to make us believe they were not connected in any way with him in a future plot to assassinate the President. Walker was in too good spirits after the shooting and, later on, admited knowing about the brothers’ alleged involvement into the shooting. As Larrie said for LOOK magazine, they were always planning ahead... That is, unless we can find some real dirt on the CUSA (and I'm all for the search) then I won't try to insinuate them in a JFK conspiracy, the way Patricia Swank tried to do. – I can see no connection to the JFK assassination in Patricia Swank’s article, where her refference is to the “CUSA Conspiracy” in regard to gaining control of conservative organizations. Greg pointed this out, as well, and you, Paul, agreed with it, so we are clear on this one. Larrie Schmidt “was so disgusted with our Government and so humiliated”... “She said: ‘If you don’t like the damn world, why don’t you change it?’ And I said: ‘By God, that’s not a bad idea.’ – and he helped did so! (LOOK magazine article). Then... you turn back to your initial thoughts into believing Larrie Schmidt was used by JBS leaders to cover their asses and implicate CUSA. Nice turnover, Paul! No wonder Tom Scully resigned from ”reading your position” on this curious young man. And now– with your final words posted on the penultimate comment in this thread – we finally do agree! Cheers! :-)

I am very, very surprised that someone is giving any credit to this man, who is obviously lying. Period!

I would add several names that I remember on the spot. If I dig deep I can surely remember some more: Earle Cabell Bill Decker Will Greer Roy Kellerman Emory Roberts James Joseph Rowley McGeorge Bundy (brother of CIA operative William Bundy and the probable redactor of NSAM #273: http://www.jfklancer.com/NSAM273.html).

Great to hear from you, Wynne! I believe the more away from the „writting business” one is, the more credible his story should be. Sadly, the pursuit for financial gains tends to impede upon one’s honesty (in targeting for the sensational). For me, your story is FACT and I believe in your total honesty and that is why I publicized your videos on several Facebook JFK groups. That’s why I ask you to paste here the valid links to all your videos, for easier access. And if you add to their title „JFK” I think they’d be much easier to locate. Thank you! Regarding the “two Oswalds”, I am now reading exactly that part covered in the great ’JFK and the Unspeakable’ book and it is very, very interesting... And another coincidence regarding elimination of witnesses, I have just read about journalist Gary Webb, author of ’Dark Alliance’ book (covering the CIA drug trafficking in the Iran-Contra scandal), was found dead aged 49 and the coroner’s office ruled it a suicide, although TWO bullets were fired into his skull. So we know how these things work... Wynne, thank you for letting us know that YOU are the one “messing with the evidence” - I mean with your own videos on the Internet. :-) But please clarify the fact that you declined the offer to speak because you were not WILLING to mention the “Ruth Ann” part of your story or because you were not ALLOWED to reveal it. I suspect it is the latter, but I am not sure I understand correctly. So this answer and the 6 links, I beg of you! Cheers, Gabriel

@Kathleen Collins There are a bunch of fantasy versions on the assassination that are too stupid to consider. So I skip all of them. Anyone who disregards the Ed Lansdale involvement (as coordinator) - see the three tramps photo and col. Prouty’s comments about it - lacks credibility. Anyone who sees Richard Nixon as a Mob friend and makes no connection to the Bush family lacks credibility. And a person who omits these key points cannot be credited with a fair description of the plot to assassinate President Kennedy. A same person imagined (can’t see other source of it but his own mind) a plan of JFK and RFK to fake the assassination. Duh! I speak of the man bearing the name of Lamar Waldron, whom I have erased from my list instantly. Also, I have read from the book Death of a President and it contains a bunch of lies - Oswald was the lone killer - and a bunch of profanities like the one describing how the shot President GRACEFULLY got his right hand up in the air so if he wanted to fix his haircut, but the hand fell down lifelessly. That he wanted to touch the top of his head, but there was nothing left. The awful scene of the President’s murdering is so graciously described that the reader feels like punching the author’s face. I threw the book as garbage. @Michael Clark I have seen the video and is very intriguing, thank you! Back to the topic now: SS agent Abraham Bolden told me there was no SS agent killed in Dallas that day. My feeling is the story was part of the smoke and mirrors that Ed Lansdale was expert in. Thanks! Gabriel

In my opinion, both Gerry Hemming and “Tosh” Plumlee are frauds. They try to bury us in half truths and details os the assassination already revealed by honest investigators to get us away from the WHOLE (real) picture or make us believe they are benevolent in furnishing vital information. And for them to appear somewhat less than murderers (actual or complicit). GabyStan

Joe, thank you for sharing your recollection of some precise facts from way back in 11/22/63. It seems to me - and you’re confirming it here - that ONLY George Herbert Walker Bush does not remember where he was on that fateful day... :-( About the Polka Dot girl I cannot say much yet, since I am yet to see Part 4 of Southland Center 1963, but I’ve read this Patrick Nolan book https://www.amazon.com/CIA-Rogues-Killing-Kennedys-Assassinate/dp/1634502736 which got me into the Polka Dot lady search (with no relevant results yet) and, thus, bought this other https://www.amazon.com/Polka-File-Robert-Kennedy-Killing-ebook/dp/B01G99QICE/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515168252&sr=1-2&keywords=polka+dot that I will read in the near future. :-) Cheers, GabyStan

Michael, allow me to put this right: Mr. Johnson said he first intended to use a pseudonym, but then considered it not being thruthful to his 100% objectivity and thus used her real name, Vicki. With i, not y. Then, later on, he started reading a novel of David Atlee Philips and stumbled upon a character named Vicky. At that point he stopped reading the book for good, because he did not want that character named Vicky to interfere with the real Vicki from his story. Hope that answers your dilemma. Cheers, GabyStan

I am sad to find out the e-mail address of Wynne Johnson (shared along with Part 4 of his videos) is no longer available. I wrote him a message about the videos vanishing from both Vimeo and YouTube. Sadly enough, Mr. Johnson appears not to be answering here any longer, I hope he’s OK! :-( Any idea how can those videos be downloaded for safe-keeping and maybe even sharing? Thanks! GabyStan

Following the videos from Wynne Johnson, I’ve noticed they keep on disappearing from both Vimeo and YouTube. Worried about their further vanishing, I tried to download them, but without any success. Even as they are now, I found them very, very hard to locate, without stumbling onto a direct link to them, so I feel spreading them to more than one location, by more than one person, is badly required. No offence, but God knows what can happen to Wynne and, thus, his videos could be lost forever. So far they have enjoyed little popularity - no wonder, since they are so difficult to find. See, as I’m writting this, I made a check upon the videos again and, no wonder, found that part 1 is no longer available on Vimeo (only parts 2 and 4) and part 3 (from the link I’ve posted above) is no longer available on YouTube. Some smart xxx (intelligence?!) guys do a really fine job of making them disappear. Let us do an even better job of spreading them around... I’m first one in! P.S. A ”JFK assassination” tag besides ”Southland Center” should make them easier to be discovered by investigators.

Excellent work, Wynne! We all appreciate your recollections' sharing with us, since it is of such great value for all JFK investigators. I am still to see parts from 3 onwards, but noticed part 3 is no longer valid on Vimeo, but instead I found it here on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynx69SWrxTU Southland Center 1963, Part 3 Can you tell us here those parts of your story that you found puzzling and did not want to record in the films? I am very much interested in every piece of information you can give us, since I am convinced of your honesty about it all. Thank you! Cheers! Gabriel

My name is Gabriel Stan and I live in Romania. Although graduated in electromechanical engineering, I work as a librarian since 2001. My „passion” is Truth and thus I went through philosophy and currently am a student of the JFK assassination and that’s how I found about this Forum. The subject is vast and my findings cover all sorts of clandestine operations perpetrated by secret organisations and services around the world - which I trully and deeply detest. By the way: I hate money! It is the worst and utmost corruptor of minds and souls. Essentially, we need so few of it to be happy... Hopefully, besides learning about information of great interest to me, I can, for my part, bring some of my findings to your attention and interest. As a seeker of truth and wisdom, my guiding motto is the socratic „know thyself”.