Adam Johnson

LOL.

Never gunna happen. Cold cold heart.

How has this guy never been considered as DCM Nestor "Tony" Izquierdo

What troubles me from reading this lead and search story over again is that it always seems to be Dallas Police Officers who are labelled as the ones who try to intimidate witnesses, reporters or researchers looking to uncover the truth. Even in this case when it is years and years after the assassination Mr. Glaze states nearly 20 dpd officers pull up outside his home and start pointing weapons at his windows. Within hours of his interviewing one of the two female clerks someone has put the fear of god into them and they pack up and leave Dallas. Only someone in a law enforcement uniform/organisation telling me to get out of town now or else could have that effect...anyone else and you would contact law enforcement for help. So what does this mean as far as the assassination theories go.....why are the dallas pd involved in intimidation and threats 1,2,4,5,6,7,8 10 years after the assassination??? Or is their some collective group of men with access to dpd vehicles, clothing and id's rolling around dallas from late 1963 to 1976 who pulled off the world's greatest coup d'etat?

Thank you for the reply, i have read Best Evidence a couple of times several years apart. The closeness of your relationship with Prof. Leibeler and his encouragement of your early investigations intrigued me. With the new information you discovered from your interviews as you progressed it seemed to me from reading your book, that in his mind he always thought someday someone would come along to tear down the warren report and bring light to its many failings. I think he may of taken some pride from the fact that you were the one to get the bolder rolling in 1965/66. What did surprise me was why he took part as special counsel and agreed to conduct hearings of witness and experts, but in those interviews he chose to lead witnesees or failed to ask obvious questions that could reveal many truths about what happened on the 22nd of November. His career didnt seem to blossom as a result of taking part in the W.C. He clearly was one of the few involved that tried unsuccessfully years later to get the report re-investigated. Did you ever ask him why he stayed on board the creation of a presidential report, he must of discovered was clearly being guided to one finding and one finding only? Thank you again for your earlier reply.

Dear Mr.Lifton, Did Professor Liebeler ever reveal to you his thoughts on what he believed really happend on Nov 22nd 1963 after his work for the Warren Commission? P.S Sorry for the loss of your friend W.L in the plane crash.

Cannot believe this ridiculous theory has 4 pages of comments. Colm find anyone who is a shooter, hunter and try and run your idea by them. If your able to find a former military sniper to talk too, run your idea by them. I believe they will allow you to move on with your life rather quickly and you can then put this silly theory behind you. Good luck sir.

Great article, One continuous common trend it seems of men in power within the intelligence/investigative fields of the United States during the 50's 60's 70's and perhaps we will find out of the 80's and beyond is "that even though they are government employees and whatever work or files or information they produce during their careers of government service this body of work/files/information belongs to the US government and the people of the United States, they all believe it is their right to destroy that information when they leave office". To me the destruction of these materials is criminal. When someone in such a position is fired or retired all of their personal files should be confiscated before that employees departure. If that person has destroyed or removed files before they leave office, pension benefits can be reduced or totally withheld in extreme cases. That information and records of service belongs to the country not the individual.

I'm a Winn Dixie kinda guy!!!! Adam

How in the 28 years since Oliver Stones 1991 film JFK was this peanut the only person to find a man called Clay Bertrand that had lived in Louisiana from 1962 until 2019?

Over the years i have often wondered how the lawyers selected to represent/assist the Warren Commission in finding the truth in the JFK assassination lived with themselves after the report was published. Especially after their colleagues had time to dissected the report and saw how they interviewed the witnesses and chose to neglect there task of finding the answers to many burning questions by the way they chose their lines of questioning. I know David Lifton had close contact with professor Liebeler who seemed to encourage David in his research efforts but this clip from 1967 shows that Leibeler was still defending the report to the world and taking shots at Jim Garrison in the process, when he must have known that the Warren Reports findings were a house of cards. Why would he do this in 67 then a few years later write to J Lee Rankin and Earl Warren and Gerald Ford and others when Lifton found so called "new evidence" (i dont think it was new to these assistant counsels at all) My personal feelings towards Leibeler, Rankin, Ball and Belin is that they chose to actively pervert the course of justice and betrayed the American people. And for what, what did they gain in the long run. https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Wesley+J.+Liebeler+&&view=detail&mid=F35C75C2FBD0BE4754A6F35C75C2FBD0BE4754A6&&FORM=VRDGAR David, if you see this i hope you have the time to express your thoughts I'm sure you respected and admired professor Leibeler, he appears to me to be the only one involved in the commission that showed any desire to improve its findings....... Adam

Wow i wonder how LBJ reacted to these gags about him??? https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=YouTube+Vaughn+Meader&&view=detail&mid=E1912620D1CCF796B524E1912620D1CCF796B524&rvsmid=147A4A80DEE269355959147A4A80DEE269355959&FORM=VDQVAP

This was pretty funny.....in parts https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Poor+Vaughn+Meader&&view=detail&mid=612B6C65079ABC6B360D612B6C65079ABC6B360D&rvsmid=8E4C78A413CE369350798E4C78A413CE36935079&FORM=VDQVAP

Yep thats the spot Robin, But in Nov 63 both those tree trunks where very young and thin....one was bent out and upwards like an elbow .....however at the time of the assassination both trunks were in shadow by the tree further down the knoll towards the footpath and the section of fencing that bends back towards the TSBD was in full sunlight.... So why any dark section appears in this fully lit 8 to 10 feet of picket fencing is unusual..........this was the very first section of picket fencing perhaps 8 to 10 feet long that is the straight line grassy knoll fence running back up towards the pergola........It is also the fist spot concealed from view of anyone standing on the triple overpass......my thinking is that one or two of those pickets were loosened at the bottom cross beam that holds the pickets in place and a gap allowing vision and line of sight back up Elm st was created by pushing them out slightly and to the side. I dont think someone was in the storm drain behind the fence, but it is possible that they could have been laying down prone on the ground looking thru a gap to the left of the drain. I've stood, sat and laid down in this spot several times for different lengths of time and as a shooter myself other then inside the Daltex building its the only outside firing position that you could ask me to personally place myself if i had to agree to attempt to take a single shot at the president. There was enough space to fire behind or in front of those two thin tree trunks back in 1963.....the prone firing position i have marked in the second image is behind the concrete section which can be seen in the first image......If you look at the Canncellare photo from that day you can see the large tree that shades the two smaller ones which are right behind the large trees trunk in that image.......you can also grasp the distance back to the underpass fence line point where people have run to and are looking over the fence at the railway yard. In the Bell film several times a black line appears in this section of fence line that is in bright sunlight.....its not a shadow cast by the two small tree trunks and its not the trunks themselves...so logically the fence pickets or a picket must be ajar to create the black line....well thats my speculation and why i believe Harry Cabluck's photo had a box covering this fence section for 40 years. Regards, Adam.

Thanks Robin, I have visited your amazing site hundreds of times over the years....thanks for all your effort in compiling and maintaining the site. This is by far the cleanest single frame pics of the bell film i have seen anywhere.....I have been interested in the area i have highlighted below for almost 20 years now.....i even was in contact with Harry Cabluck regarding his pics from the press bus as it rolled by that day......one in particular that had a square section of the fence line covered over in the only images available of this fence area for many years like 1990 to 2010, later after writing too him several times he told me a university had all his negatives and a reader of Robert Harris forum went and found them...which has resulted in a super clean clear image of that piece of fence line with no square section covered up....why the covered section image showed up in every available photo for the first 40 plus years prior has always troubled me.... I know it may be a lot to ask, but is there any way you could put together a moving frame by frame Gif that shows this area from your bell film copy?????i know its a lot to ask but my computer skills are non existent when it comes to such things.....many thanks once again, Adam..

Hi Andrej, Do you think that the right wrist area of prayer man is covered by a watch/leather band or some type of jewellery or is it just shaded/out of sunlight????

Thanks Robin, Is there any chance you can do a gif that includes the area where the concrete overpass meets the picket fence line of the knoll.....im pretty sure it appears for a few frames prior to where this one starts and it also shows up as bell starts back up elm street after ss car disappears into shade. Many Thanks Adam.

Wow Chris, Thats the cleanest copy of bell film i have seen......could you please post the whole thing......if not a section that shows the overpass just as limo goes thru tunnel......many thanks. Adam

This guy looked a bit like Oswald in 1963.

Hi Jim, The image is CE350 from warren commission exhibits Vol XVI.

Found some CIA-Cuba crypto nam

Part 3 puts some faces and voices to a few well known names.

Truly and Baker discuss their actions after the shooting on film. Starts around 2:25.

For JIm, Taken 11/23/63 between 01:15am-04:25am

Did Oswald have his ID bracelet on his right hand??? The gif seems to show a clear flash on the right arm/wrist of prayer man. Possibly some type of jewellery?