John Kozlowski
-
Posts
352 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by John Kozlowski
-
-
6 hours ago, Paul Bacon said:
I believe what you're looking at are bloodied rose florets from the bouquet of roses Jackie was holding.
Yeah after looking at it for a minute I figured the same.
-
1 hour ago, John Butler said:
Sorry Joe B,
I don't know how I missed this. I would have responded. That was in Sept. 2018 and I could have been on a vacation trip. I do two a year, one in the spring and one in the fall.
This photo seems to be staged to match the lone gunman / single bullet / shooting from the Sniper's Nest theories. I don't know what that pink material is. We are supposed to think this is Kennedy's brain tissue. The way it is distributed would match the theories mentioned above and for supporters of the WC this would be conclusive.
I don't believe it at all. This appears staged. Jackie could not have sat in those alleged remains and have very little stains on the back of her skirt. Or, for that matter the front of her outfit. The mess in the vehicle doesn't match the blood stains on her outfit.
The spot that President Kennedy sat in seems to be cleaned. You can see where blood stains have been wiped away and where others are being wiped on, or the beginning of wiping away.
This pic has a better view of brain and/or skull fragments. Something about the way they are arranged looks weird to me. Looks like they were set in place. I could be totally wrong but it just looks off.
-
54 minutes ago, John Butler said:
Sorry Joe B,
I don't know how I missed this. I would have responded. That was in Sept. 2018 and I could have been on a vacation trip. I do two a year, one in the spring and one in the fall.
This photo seems to be staged to match the lone gunman / single bullet / shooting from the Sniper's Nest theories. I don't know what that pink material is. We are supposed to think this is Kennedy's brain tissue. The way it is distributed would match the theories mentioned above and for supporters of the WC this would be conclusive.
I don't believe it at all. This appears staged. Jackie could not have sat in those alleged remains and have very little stains on the back of her skirt. Or, for that matter the front of her outfit. The mess in the vehicle doesn't match the blood stains on her outfit.
The spot that President Kennedy sat in seems to be cleaned. You can see where blood stains have been wiped away and where others are being wiped on, or the beginning of wiping away.
Plus if the Secret Service did wipe down the car you’d figure they would start with that mess of blood and what looks like brain matter. I’d think there would be less where JFK was sitting since he slumped into Jackie’s lap. I agree that this is a staged picture. Any idea of where the car is parked when this was taken?
-
For those interested in Dino Brugioni here is a video of him speaking with Doug Horne.
-
10 minutes ago, Jim Hargrove said:
Google, DuckDuckGo and Bing apparently all index every single post from this forum, at least from the “JFK Assassination Debate” sub-forum, which is what I follow. JFK assassination-specific queries on all three of these search engines usually produce Education Forum results high on the first page of the results. The more specific the query is, from my experience, the higher the Ed Forum ranks in the results.
That’s the main reason I try to make every post I write as good as I can make it. And yes, I wish they were all better. But keeping criticism alive of the Warren Commission conclusions is important to me and hopefully just as important to most other people here, and this is one of the best ways available to do it. Once again, thanks to James R. Gordon for helping to make this happen.
If the Ed Forum were to become a private website, the search engines would no longer cover it. Please keep the “JFK Assassination Debate” forum open and public! A lot may depend on this!
There are definitely cons to making it private. I wasn’t trying to sway his mind one way or another. It would hurt this place more than help.
James said he didn’t really have any options and I was just letting him know that isn’t really true at all. Like you said if someone does an internet search they won’t find anything from here and that will keep new users from signing up.
I’ve been a mod on quite a few forums over the years and it has helped many but also hurt some. At this point since DVP isn’t able to comment I see no real reason for him to continue to copy posts. But if it would continue for some reason there is always that option.
-
4 minutes ago, W. Tracy Parnell said:
David stated previously here that the reason he archived posts was to have a record of his conversations with CTs. I think the fear expressed that he will "collect posts" is unfounded and much ado about nothing. If he can no longer participate here there is presumably no reason for him to "collect posts."
I was just letting him know that blocking an IP will not keep someone away. I have no dog in this fight but thought in case something happens in the future that James should know there are options that can be considered.
-
3 hours ago, James R Gordon said:
The EF forum is owned by Invision. We do not own this site - we lease it from Invision - and the kinds of options above are not open to us.
If we did own the site that would be a different matter.
I am not unsympathetic to the ideas expressed and if this were an independently owned site that would be different.
James.
I was looking on the Invision forum and read that you can make sub forums into “clubs”. It wouldn’t make the whole site private just whatever section you wanted. If you did want to go that route it is possible to do.
-
3 hours ago, Micah Mileto said:
The Opera web browser has a free VPN option.
There are literally hundreds if not thousands of free vpn apps or programs available. If someone wants to read this forum you can’t really stop them unless you close it to all non members
-
3 hours ago, James R Gordon said:
The EF forum is owned by Invision. We do not own this site - we lease it from Invision - and the kinds of options above are not open to us.
If we did own the site that would be a different matter.
I am not unsympathetic to the ideas expressed and if this were an independently owned site that would be different.
James.
Have you talked with them about making it private? If that’s the route you want to take it should be able to be done very easily. Ive modded a few forums in the past which were under different providers and they all had an option similar to what I stated. It would just require people to login to be able to view posts. Like I said earlier it may limit new members but it would be private.
-
1 hour ago, James R Gordon said:
Kathy and Forum members,
I apologies I should have made this clear earlier.. DVP boasted on another forum that the measures I initially took had no effect - except the ability to post - and that he could still enter the forum. One member pointed out that only by banning his IP's would we sucessfully keep him out of the forum. Unfortunately Invision informed me that the only way to do that was to Ban him as well as banning his IP's.
Reluctantly I have banned DVP as well as his IP addresses.
That was not what I initially intended, but without doing that there was no guarantee that DVP would not return to the forum and copy whatever he wanted.
I am sorry I should have announced I had done this earlier.
Regarding DVP's posts they still exist. Of course he can ask for them to be deleted. As a point of interest it should be noted that if a member asks for their posts be deleted we can do that except any post that lead's a thread. Those posts cannot be deleted and are not deleted.
James
Banning his IP won’t keep him from browsing here or from him collecting posts. Honestly the only way to do that is to make the forum totally private to members only. I’m on another forum that is private and non members cannot see anything. That would hurt you in getting new members though. By using a VPN or similar program it’s very easy to get a random IP address from anywhere in the world.
-
4 hours ago, Jim Hargrove said:
Interesting question. Beckham would still be in his seventies, and so he might well be alive.
We should note, however, that he testified to Garrison's grand jury and told a somewhat different story. He said, for example, that he never met "Oswald," and that he was not in Dallas in 1963. He did say he knew Ferrie, Banister and some of the other New Orleans characters, but not Shaw. His very lengthy testimony is here:
https://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/garr/grandjury/pdf/Beckham.pdf
True but by the time he talked to Joan Mellon alot of the people he talked about were dead so he really had nothing to worry about. Not saying what he told herself the whole truth but it’s something to look into.
-
2 hours ago, David Andrews said:
In case you haven't seen this thread:
It's useful to search DPF and EF for past Manson threads that can lead you to forums.
See this site for forum links - see bottom of page:
http://www.cielodrive.com/index.php
Sorry - I don't follow Manson stuff constantly, it's just the O'Neill book and other emerging news that revives my interest.
There's this:
http://mansonmurders.proboards.com/
There's this blog, not a forum. The guy really pushes legal and moral boundaries in dealing with the Tate family and others, but there may be some truths here:
http://tatelabianca.blogspot.com/2012/08/i-have-little-system-of-my-own.html
I did not see that. Thanks for the links!!
-
2 hours ago, Jim Harwood said:
Sorry John but I don't have any good suggestions for a Manson/Tate forum. But here is an interesting video with Manson talking about his first encounter in prison (I think he dates it 1950) with Ron Hubbard's Dianetics (Scientology) and Robert Moores "Process Church of the Final Judgement" which the British exported to this country soon after exporting the likes of the Beatles, Stones, Animals, etc. or what became tongue and cheek known as the "British Invasion" they sent the heavier artillery their satanic networks. "All you need is love.......... we all live in a yellow submarine....
Thanks for that. I recently listened to an episode of The Opperman Report that dealt with the Process Church and have started reading about it.
Edit: I see that video is from William Ramsey. He has a lot of of stuff online about the Process Church and Crowley. I listened to an episode of his podcast about the Son of Sam and possible connection to the church. Not sure how accurate it was but some made sense and was very interesting.
-
Are there any good forums dedicated to Manson and the Tate/LaBianca murder that anyone can recommend?
-
33 minutes ago, Jim Hargrove said:
Steve,
Thanks for the link on Beckham. What a hoot!
John A. describes Beckham as “a runner for Ferrie, Banister, Clay Shaw, Sergio Arcacha, and Grady Durham..." who “was given $200 by Ferrie and told to deliver a package to a man at the Executive Inn Motel in Dallas. Beckham delivered the package, which contained photographs and street maps, to Lawrence Howard at the motel...." John added in a note that the “package may also have contained diagrams of the sewer system in Dealey Plaza, which Lieutenant Francis Fruge learned from Captain Will Fritz had been found in (Sergio) Arcacha’s apartment following the assassination."
What’s really stunning in this interview is that just as Beckham was getting up to what happened in Dallas, the HSCA guy said he was running out of tape (or the tape was running too long) and wrapped things up!!
What an investigation! Perhaps Beckham would have talked about the theater, but we’ll never know. Maybe it's just me, but I'm beginning to think the HSCA didn't want to know a whole lot of things. On that measure, they were a bang-up success!
Of course they cut him off. Beckham knows a good bit of what went down the weekend of the assassination and the time leading up to it. Joan Mellon wrote that LJ Delsa and Robert Buras were suspended from the HSCA by Blakley for giving Beckham an unauthorized polygraph. He brought up Fred Lee Crisman and Buras and Adela’s wanted to have him investigated. Funny thing is Louis Stokes gave them permission to do so. Beckham ran with the guys in New Orleans and claimed he met with Oswald at the TSBD.
Do you have any clue if he’s still alive? I thought I heard on a podcast he still was but am not certain on that.
-
5 minutes ago, Joe Bauer said:
Reported today in the media that just two days before he died, Jeffrey Epstein had a new will drawn up, leaving everything to his brother.
Please weigh in with your thoughts on this Epstein action.
I believe that someone in Epstein's legal and personal circle knew ahead of time that he was going to try to kill himself again while custody.
Was it definitely left to his brother? I only read one article today and it said was left to a trust he established. The name of it I forget but it had “1953”,the year he was born in the name.
-
On 8/16/2019 at 2:00 PM, James DiEugenio said:
You got that right, because the other report I saw yesterday says she was on an estate in New England, but it did not carry her picture.
I don't trust either because she would have to be dumb to be in the USA.
That picture is 100% fake. Take a real good look at the details and it’s easy to see. I’m suprised so many people have been fooled by it. There were a lot of errors made photoshopping it.
-
1 hour ago, Bart Kamp said:
Thanks to Malcolm Blunt.
Are there any pics of him from around the time Mae Brussell and John Judge met him?
-
6 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:
Jesus, Dr. Wecht is about as credible as the come. Going back to JFK.
https://news.yahoo.com/dr-cyril-wecht-weighs-troubling-200117054.html
Nice guy too. I don’t live far from him and he happened to be doing a book signing a few years back at a little hole in the wall book store in my neighborhood. I ended up talking with him for about an hour about JFK, Jon Benet Ramsey and his career in general.
-
7 hours ago, Ron Bulman said:
So now Epstein's lawyers want to do their own investigation? Didn't they bring in Baden? Does this mean he doesn't agree with the ME's statement that it was suicide? Note the part about him hanging himself from the bed, with enough force to break bones in his neck.
Here’s an interview with Dr. Cyril Wecht on Epstein breaking bones.
-
54 minutes ago, Jim Hargrove said:
In another thread, Steve Thomas wrote this:
As I was reading through the pages of CE 985 that Steve pointed to, one thing jumped off the page to me. In a short “autobiography” allegedly written in “Oswald’s” own hand as part of an application for employment at the Minsk radio plant, he wrote:
“...my parents are dead, I have no brothers or sisters.” The rest of the paragraph pretty much matches the biography of Classic Oswald®. Take a look at the page:
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1135#relPageId=441&tab=page
I’m sure WC loyalists will just say “Oswald” was playing games with the Soviets, but the odd thing about this is that the statement is probably true for the Russian-speaking Oswald. Anyone have any other thoughts, or thoughts on the questions Steve raised?
Didn’t he send his mother and brother letters from Russia? If so I’d imagine the Govt read all of his mail and would have seen he lied on the application.
-
23 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:
I've never looked into methods to hang oneself. I'd never thought about this just kneeling down. I guess you'd have to force yourself to stay knelt down until you passed out. Seems like the natural reaction when you started choking would be to stand up. Like I said I'm not familiar with the subject. I figured people who do such usually stand on a chair or stool and kick it out from underneath them or maybe jump off of something, a table, chair or whatever.
If what you mention about the 5-8' drop to break the bones in the neck is true that's interesting. The only possibility I can think of is off a top bunk but from what I've read there is nothing to tie a sheet to in the top of most cells and I can't see most of them having a very high ceiling in the first place.
So is it still an ongoing investigation because of the guards sleeping or now case closed? I've read nothing about if he was found kneeling, hanging from a bunk or the ceiling or what. Think that might be in a report released in 3-4-6 months? Or is it confidential information that can't be released because it might reveal sources and methods?
I’ve read a few stories that said he knelt downwith the sheet ride around the bed but who knows how it really happened right now.
I browsed around online for a while looking into the broken bone and from what I read it mostly happens when the person drops down a few feet with the rope around their neck. The force breaks the bone when the rope or sheet in this case snaps back. I have a hard time believing he broke it just by kneeling down the way some sources claim he did.
-
If any of you have watched the HBO show The Wire this reminds me of when D’Angelo “hung” himself in prison
-
1 hour ago, Ron Bulman said:
It's "Official", with Baden's blessing I guess.
I’m no doctor but from reading up on how the bone in the neck breaks during a hanging he would’ve had to have dropped 5-8ft. Didn’t he just tie the sheet from a bunk and kneel down to cut of oxygen to his brain?
JFK Secret Service Agent: hole in windshield of limo!
in JFK Assassination Debate
Posted
The website I pulled that from had no info given for the pic. I didn’t recall seeing that view of the limo in the past so was just wondering if it was from a re-creation or something. Just the way the “skull/brain” fragments are arranged it looked kind of staged to me. But I think Paul is right and it’s just flower pedals