Jump to content
The Education Forum

Paul Bacon

Members
  • Content Count

    133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Paul Bacon

  1. 9 hours ago, Ron Bulman said:

    I think so too.  Horne I believe is the one who mentioned frames cut out for "debris removal".  The extent of the explosion Brugioni saw, what splattered Hargis and the other motorcycle cop and the driver of the follow up car?  I have to wonder what else they might have shown in terms of head movement.

    If I remember correctly Horne also mentioned removal of these frames speeding up the perceived back and to the left sequence.

    Indeed Ron.

    Doug also suggested the Z film was shot at 48 fps.  All kinds of data: head movement, exit debris, reactions of other occupants, limo speed, shot sequence, etc. could have been removed and still present a coherent film.

    And to Jeremy, there were (3) copies (possibly 4) and one original already in existance by Friday afternoon.  Pretty hard to make a case that the film was accidentally destroyed when there are already four or five copies floating about.

  2. Then, of course, there's the idea suggested by Doug Horne and others, that the Z film was recorded at 48 fps and edited down to closer to 16 fps like the other cameras.  I wonder how much the Z film would have captured that the other films didn't.  After editing, wouldn't all films still sync with each other?

  3. 6 hours ago, David Andrews said:

    Well, how would a GK-sourced blowout from the right rear of the skull have spattered Hargis, behind the left rear fender?  The cited blowout spot is already rotated away from Hargis, and toward Chaney.

    The only way would have been if JFK's head was rotated toward the GK at some point--something we don't see in the Zapruder film.  Dr. Mantik, based on his studies of the X-rays in the Archives, believed there were 3 shots to the head--above the right eye, tangential entrance just above and in front of the right ear, and a posterior shot at the base of the skull.  Witnesses say the shots were nearly simultaneous.  Any of the shots could easily have rotated JFK's head to make it possible for a shot from the GK to impact Hargis.  Of course, none of this is seen in the manipulated Zap film.

    Another thing to ponder, is that the metalic debris trail across the top of the head means that JFK must have been sitting upright at the time of the shot.  We don't see that in the Z film either.

  4. On 5/1/2021 at 1:15 AM, Ron Bulman said:

    What I still can't reconcile is back and to the left from the front left.  The geometry, physics, angle of that.

    The video Chris B. linked to shows how that is reconciled.  What I can't reconcile is, if the rear blowout was caused by the shot from the South Knoll, how was it that Bobby Hargis was hit so forcefully by blood and brain matter?  Another shot from the Grassy Knoll?

  5. 23 hours ago, Steve Thomas said:

    https://www.writeintrumpforgeorgiasenate.com/

     

    CRUSH THE LIBERAL/SOCIALIST PLOT TO DESTROY AMERICA BY WRITING IN TRUMP FOR GEORGIA SENATE RUNOFFS

    With enough write-ins in the Georgia senate race, we can tilt the balance in Georgia in Trump's favor! If we can do this, we have a real chance at getting these RINO senators to act on the illegitimate and corrupt election presided over by a Democrat party that is invested in the Communist takeover of Our Great Nation. We will not stop fighting for you, the American Patriot, against the evils of Socialism and inferior Religions. This is a Christian Nation and will be as long as we fight, together, for our sovereignty.

    This website has been paid for by the Committee for American Sovereignty

    Steve Thomas

    The language here is remeniscent of "Reefer Madness".  Cannabis will turn you into a Communist and make your eyeballs hang from their sockets.

  6. David Lifton, thanks very much for weighing back in.  In my mind, this all gives credence to the John Liggett story ...a quick and sloppy job of evidence destruction.  Done on the plane back to Washington?

    The assasination happened 4 days before my 11th birthday.  It is seared in my memory.  I remember watching the live feed during Oswald's transfer on Sunday morning when someone, out of nowhere, jumps out and shoots Oswald in the guts.  I was stunned and ran to tell my mother what just happened.

    I followed everything for weeks afterward ...the Life articles and pictures.  But, soon it all went dormant in my mind.  I was somewhat aware that the Zapruder film was out in the open circa 1975, but it wasn't until Stone's JFK that everything was thrust forward.  I watched the movie in the theatre 3 times just to see the Zapruder film again ...couldn't believe my eyes.

    Thanks David, for your work.

  7. 41 minutes ago, Robert Burrows said:

    This is a good example of a real case of Trump Derangement Sydrome. This poor man sounds as insane as a member of Jim Jones's Peoples Temple. Kool-aid anyone?

     

    The man built himself an alternate reality, and is now totally distraught over the newest developements in that alternate reality.  C'mon man, just change your mind!  Jeez...

  8. 14 hours ago, Robert Montenegro said:

    Modern quantum dynamics and astrophysics indicate that the concept of eternity is a factual thing. Modern thermal dynamics indicate that energy can never be destroyed, only transmuted.

    That means the energy I am made of has always been here and will only get transmuted into something else. This existence of flesh and blood is only temporary, and I want my energy to be transmuted into a state of existence without pain.

    I believe in Hell, because I have stood shoulder-to-shoulder with persons worthy of it, just as I was. I and my family would be willing to die, not to escape from an eternity of chaos, but to set an example for others to live by.

    Nothing in this material world is worth my soul, yet everything in the natural Earth is worth my flesh.

    As for being bold, I gave up pride and truth a long time ago; honor and fact are my currency.

     

    Very well said Robert.  But I don't know if I have the courage to be that resolute.

  9. Thank you for posting this link Doug.  Very, very interesting interview.

    Along with most others, I anxiously await "Final Charade."

    The little teasers Lifton leaves for us ..."the esophagus was hanging out of the throat wound", "throat wound sewed up with sutures" ??!  And he suggests he understands what the original plan for the body and the evidence the body would show were.

     "Best Evidence" was the first book I read after seeing Stone's JFK.  It was a paradigm shift for me.  I hold David Lifton in very high regard.  I have always wondered where the pre-autopsy body alterations were done and we may get an answer.

    David Lifton and Doug Horne are my favorites.

  10. 5 hours ago, Greg Doudna said:

    A particularly interesting finding from the blur analysis concerns Z313, the head shot. JFK's head can be seen hit at Z313 with the spray of brain and bloody matter. But the blur episode begins at Z313. But that means that shot cannot have come from the TSBD, because if so the sound (the shock wave from the bullet breaking the sound barrier at the presidential limousine) would take longer to arrive to Zapruder and cause his startle response, than could be reflected in Z313.

    The blur at z313 could also be a result of a shot immediately before it,  say at z310.  If you look closely, JFK's head is pushed forward just before z313.

    There is so much more information to be considered before you present your theory, although I do appreciate your sincerity.

  11. 12 hours ago, Chris Bristow said:

    I think his head starts to moves back just before  it disappears behind Hill. The rest is hidden by Hargis, Moorman and Hill.
    Lately I question whether he moves back AND LEFT. JFK is already leaning left at almost 45 degrees so I don't know if he goes left or just straight back from a leftward position. Some also claim a shot from the drain because JFK moves upward as if hit from below. But I would think if you are forced backwards from a hunched forward position you torso would naturally unfold and so rise up as it fell back. I think the force would naturally push his upper body back and that would straighten the torso.

    I agree with you Chris.  Definitely back, but as you say, not so much to the left.

    What I think I'm seeing in the video I linked to, is not only his head going back, but shoulders and upper body as well.  The torso seems to rise a bit as it's launched backward.  The continuation of that movement is then hidden behind Jean Hill and Bobby Hargis as they converge.

    On ‎6‎/‎18‎/‎2020 at 9:57 AM, Paul Bacon said:

    Possibly, but I think what Chris Davidson's GIF demonstrates, is two different shots at two different instances and that the shots were less than a second apart.

    I'm not so sure, anymore, about my proclamation here.  It still could be true that there were two, almost simultaneous shots, but the Muchmore frame that Chris D. synced with z313, could be one and the same shot.  The reason I think that may be the case, is because in viewing more of  the Muchmore video, the puff of debris above Kennedy's head that Chris D's frame shows, seems to flow naturally into the backward movement in the subsequent frames.  In other words, the Muchmore film seems to validate what we see in Zapruder.

×
×
  • Create New...