Jump to content
The Education Forum

Paul Bacon

Members
  • Content Count

    119
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Paul Bacon

  1. 23 hours ago, Steve Thomas said:

    https://www.writeintrumpforgeorgiasenate.com/

     

    CRUSH THE LIBERAL/SOCIALIST PLOT TO DESTROY AMERICA BY WRITING IN TRUMP FOR GEORGIA SENATE RUNOFFS

    With enough write-ins in the Georgia senate race, we can tilt the balance in Georgia in Trump's favor! If we can do this, we have a real chance at getting these RINO senators to act on the illegitimate and corrupt election presided over by a Democrat party that is invested in the Communist takeover of Our Great Nation. We will not stop fighting for you, the American Patriot, against the evils of Socialism and inferior Religions. This is a Christian Nation and will be as long as we fight, together, for our sovereignty.

    This website has been paid for by the Committee for American Sovereignty

    Steve Thomas

    The language here is remeniscent of "Reefer Madness".  Cannabis will turn you into a Communist and make your eyeballs hang from their sockets.

  2. David Lifton, thanks very much for weighing back in.  In my mind, this all gives credence to the John Liggett story ...a quick and sloppy job of evidence destruction.  Done on the plane back to Washington?

    The assasination happened 4 days before my 11th birthday.  It is seared in my memory.  I remember watching the live feed during Oswald's transfer on Sunday morning when someone, out of nowhere, jumps out and shoots Oswald in the guts.  I was stunned and ran to tell my mother what just happened.

    I followed everything for weeks afterward ...the Life articles and pictures.  But, soon it all went dormant in my mind.  I was somewhat aware that the Zapruder film was out in the open circa 1975, but it wasn't until Stone's JFK that everything was thrust forward.  I watched the movie in the theatre 3 times just to see the Zapruder film again ...couldn't believe my eyes.

    Thanks David, for your work.

  3. 41 minutes ago, Robert Burrows said:

    This is a good example of a real case of Trump Derangement Sydrome. This poor man sounds as insane as a member of Jim Jones's Peoples Temple. Kool-aid anyone?

     

    The man built himself an alternate reality, and is now totally distraught over the newest developements in that alternate reality.  C'mon man, just change your mind!  Jeez...

  4. 14 hours ago, Robert Montenegro said:

    Modern quantum dynamics and astrophysics indicate that the concept of eternity is a factual thing. Modern thermal dynamics indicate that energy can never be destroyed, only transmuted.

    That means the energy I am made of has always been here and will only get transmuted into something else. This existence of flesh and blood is only temporary, and I want my energy to be transmuted into a state of existence without pain.

    I believe in Hell, because I have stood shoulder-to-shoulder with persons worthy of it, just as I was. I and my family would be willing to die, not to escape from an eternity of chaos, but to set an example for others to live by.

    Nothing in this material world is worth my soul, yet everything in the natural Earth is worth my flesh.

    As for being bold, I gave up pride and truth a long time ago; honor and fact are my currency.

     

    Very well said Robert.  But I don't know if I have the courage to be that resolute.

  5. Thank you for posting this link Doug.  Very, very interesting interview.

    Along with most others, I anxiously await "Final Charade."

    The little teasers Lifton leaves for us ..."the esophagus was hanging out of the throat wound", "throat wound sewed up with sutures" ??!  And he suggests he understands what the original plan for the body and the evidence the body would show were.

     "Best Evidence" was the first book I read after seeing Stone's JFK.  It was a paradigm shift for me.  I hold David Lifton in very high regard.  I have always wondered where the pre-autopsy body alterations were done and we may get an answer.

    David Lifton and Doug Horne are my favorites.

  6. 5 hours ago, Greg Doudna said:

    A particularly interesting finding from the blur analysis concerns Z313, the head shot. JFK's head can be seen hit at Z313 with the spray of brain and bloody matter. But the blur episode begins at Z313. But that means that shot cannot have come from the TSBD, because if so the sound (the shock wave from the bullet breaking the sound barrier at the presidential limousine) would take longer to arrive to Zapruder and cause his startle response, than could be reflected in Z313.

    The blur at z313 could also be a result of a shot immediately before it,  say at z310.  If you look closely, JFK's head is pushed forward just before z313.

    There is so much more information to be considered before you present your theory, although I do appreciate your sincerity.

  7. 12 hours ago, Chris Bristow said:

    I think his head starts to moves back just before  it disappears behind Hill. The rest is hidden by Hargis, Moorman and Hill.
    Lately I question whether he moves back AND LEFT. JFK is already leaning left at almost 45 degrees so I don't know if he goes left or just straight back from a leftward position. Some also claim a shot from the drain because JFK moves upward as if hit from below. But I would think if you are forced backwards from a hunched forward position you torso would naturally unfold and so rise up as it fell back. I think the force would naturally push his upper body back and that would straighten the torso.

    I agree with you Chris.  Definitely back, but as you say, not so much to the left.

    What I think I'm seeing in the video I linked to, is not only his head going back, but shoulders and upper body as well.  The torso seems to rise a bit as it's launched backward.  The continuation of that movement is then hidden behind Jean Hill and Bobby Hargis as they converge.

    On ‎6‎/‎18‎/‎2020 at 9:57 AM, Paul Bacon said:

    Possibly, but I think what Chris Davidson's GIF demonstrates, is two different shots at two different instances and that the shots were less than a second apart.

    I'm not so sure, anymore, about my proclamation here.  It still could be true that there were two, almost simultaneous shots, but the Muchmore frame that Chris D. synced with z313, could be one and the same shot.  The reason I think that may be the case, is because in viewing more of  the Muchmore video, the puff of debris above Kennedy's head that Chris D's frame shows, seems to flow naturally into the backward movement in the subsequent frames.  In other words, the Muchmore film seems to validate what we see in Zapruder.

  8. 5 hours ago, Chris Bristow said:

    I haven't fully grasped the implications of the elevation and timing differences but it is more subtle then the positions of Moorman and Hill. Hill and Moorman are actually in the correct positions when you consider the different positions of Muchmore and Zapruder.

    Possibly, but I think what Chris Davidson's GIF demonstrates, is two different shots at two different instances and that the shots were less than a second apart.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMdreKlLhJY

    This is a stabilized version of Muchmore.  Go to 1:09 in the video.  Frame 43 shows the first hit (what Chris D. shows in the GIF), but I think what I'm seeing in the next 6 frames, before Kennedy is hidden behind Jean Hill, is the "back and to the left" moment.  I'd love another opinion.

     

  9. 22 hours ago, Jim Hargrove said:

    Paul,

    Here are two YouTube videos narrated by John that have a combined viewership, so far, of 613, 431. They were put together by a fellow who calls himself MrChrillemannen.   We have no idea who MrChrillemannen is, but the narration was pieced together from interviews John has done over the years on Len Osanic's Black Ops Radio.  Some of the graphics appear to be from my website, though many can be found elsewhere as well.  There are quite a few other YouTube videos featuring John’s work.

    Captain Westbrook, officer Tippit and Oswald's double.

    2 hours 31 minutes

    335,811 views

    Who impersonated Lee Harvey Oswald?

    43 minutes

    277,620 views

    Thank you Jim.  Looking forward to viewing.  I've watched videos and read commentary by MrChrillemannen for a few years.  I have always wondered who he is.

  10. 1 hour ago, Jim Hargrove said:

    Mr. Bojczuk apparently hopes readers will believe there are "few remaining 'Harvey and Lee' believers," but he already knows quite the opposite is true.  Interest in H&L has simply been exploding in recent years.  Last time I checked, two lengthy YouTube movies based on interviews with John A have enjoyed more than 600,000 views.  Those are big numbers for JFK research.

    Jim, would you mind giving me a link or a search term to use to find the YouTube movies?  I'm very interested.

  11. 9 hours ago, James DiEugenio said:

    I want to see Ellison go after this.  He has a film and a witness. 

    He definitely knows about the incident.  I saw an interview with him the day after this thread started and he mentioned it.  He seemed very suspicious.

  12. 6 hours ago, Chris Davidson said:

    btw,

    The shot from behind could have missed and the blob was added to give the impression of a rear shot at that moment.

    Ah yes, of course.  I'd forgotten to consider the fact that nobody at Parkland saw this monstrosity. 

    I just believe that the forward movement of his head circa 313 is an indication of a shot.

    I think so too.  As, of course, many do.

    And, as you said, impossible for 1 shooter.

    But, this is more about timing using Wiegman's film as the clock, comparing it to the acoustical and showing the after affects of a limo stop/frame removal process.

    More coming.

    I understand Chris.  I can't help but speculate as you lay this out.  :eat 

     

     

     

  13. Chris, may I use my own words to describe what I think you're saying?  And then you can tell me where I've got what you're thinking correct or incorrect.

    A shot from the Dal-Tex 7th floor ledge @ z310.  We see Kennedy's head move forward slightly from z312 to z313.  Then, at virtually the same moment in time, the head is driven back by a shot from the front which also causes the back of head blowout.  The limousine has come to a stand-still just after z313 and before the shot from the front.  Kennedy's head is driven "back and to the left" by the frontal shot.

    So, the frame removal was done to hide the fact that there were two shots, at virtually the same moment in time, which would have been impossible for a lone gunman.  And the "blob" is real and not painted in, as has been suggested.  The "blob" was created by the first of those two shots which came from 7th floor Dal-Tex.

    Do I sort of have this right?

  14. 3 hours ago, Eddy Bainbridge said:

    "The limo did not travel 2.24 mph from extant z161-z166, it just represented the difference in average speed from z161-z313 when 38 frames were removed from that span." - C Davidson

     

    or in other words - The survey was done with a film that no longer matched the measurements taken. There isn't enough Elm Street between the Surveyed points to model a car moving at reasonably constant speed (Between Z161 and Z313), so the measurements have been fiddled. (There is another copy of the table showing the fiddling, obtained from the surveyor)

     

    I hope that explanation is good enough to catch anybody up whose interested.

    If it isn't Chris will help.

     

     

    Eddy, thanks for this.  It helps.  I hope you continue.

    I am transfixed by Chris's analyses.  Like the Math Rules thread, it's dense.  It takes time and concentration to follow the numbers, and I'm doing very poorly.  But, at this point, I have a decent picture of what the analysis is revealing.  Unbelievable work from Chris!

     

  15. 42 minutes ago, Eddy Bainbridge said:

    Hi Mark, I don't know much about testing the rates of cameras but my view is that there is other evidence suggestive of frame removal, for example the alleged limo stop evidence is pretty substantial and the testimony of Clint Hill conflicts with the extant film. So rather than being stuck not knowing the camera frame rate, we now have more indication of frame removal. 

    To add to your "other evidence suggestive of frame removal", the child behind his father suddenly appears beside his father, in 1 frame -1/18 of a second. 

  16. Frame removal, which was one of the major alterations in the Zapruder film, will create no discrepancy with other photographs.  Only the Nix film, where it overlaps the Zapruder film, would have had to have been also altered.  And we all know the provenance of that film is in question.

    The conspirators were not stupid.

  17. 4 hours ago, James DiEugenio said:

    I am beginning to think this might have been manmade.

    I doubt it.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/01/could-covid-19-be-manmade-what-we-know-about-origins-trump-chinese-lab-coronavirus

    Is there any evidence the virus was engineered?

    The scientific consensus rejecting the virus being engineered is almost unanimous. In a letter to Nature in March, a team in California led by microbiology professor Kristian Andersen said “the genetic data irrefutably shows that [Covid-19] is not derived from any previously used virus backbone” – in other words spliced sections of another known virus.

×
×
  • Create New...