Jon Pickering

The secondary assertion in your report - that Ruth recommended the ACLU to Marina Oswald - recalls the time the ACLU pressured Vincent Salandria into resigning from the organization one or two years into his revelatory writings on the central role the national security apparatus' had in Kennedy's murder. Unless there were two ACLUs at large at the time, that wasn't very friendly advice. In other words; kind of like what an agent would say, when the perception of the ACLU was still praiseworthy, to gain the trust of a vulnerable pigeon.

If aware of her presence, preparing to duck would have been prudent for any freely elected President - in this case Nicaragua's Ortega.

Perhaps the answer got flambeed in 1973 along with 13 million other military personnel files. Isn't that where the expression 'cooking the truth' originated? Perhaps?

Chomsky, the long term recipient of Pentagon favor and funding is a leftist? On what planet? The DoD has stated on many occasions its primary mission was to contain communism (a clear anti leftist mission) - I submit Chomsky is one of the Pentagon's tactics to contain liberalism, progressivism, leftism, and, to provide a false spokesman/leader for well-intentioned liberals - pursuant to misleading and sabotaging the efforts of youthful citizen-activists working for progressive change. Hopefully, his influence passes with his.

It's clear the perps ran a phony parallel plot designed to leech attention from their commanding role in John Kennedy's murder, and, bring the righteous ire of Americans onto the heads of any sap and sucker who could be plausibly construed as a civilian 'Kennedy hater' local to Dallas or New Orleans. The mob, rejects from Castro's Cuba, the oilmen, the cadet leaders, the Eastern pilot, various hustlers, mercenaries, Agency boobs, undercovers, the whole of New Orleans' gay community, some of them willing, even eager, some not - but all were to become 'guilty' parties to the eye of many citizens, yet, more wasteful to the reader, the carefully crafted legends of sponsored JFKA 'researchers'. Oswald was merely one of a gaggle of patsies in the JFKA.

What is weird in this debate is how murderers, pimps, gun molls, extortion artists, prison rats, head breakers, racketeers, all hustlers and XXXXX - ie., the Mafia - are given credibility. Is this an attempt to deflect? Anyone in the 'mob did it club' wanna explain?

If Lowenstein was a progressive/liberal, the particular set of principles which would indicate he was one, was left in abandonment when he advocated pro military anti communist action

Thanks to their success in handling that pesky Kennedy fellow in '63, the Italian mob now flies it flag over armed bases in over 150 countries worldwide and saw the wise guys behind it retire as wealthy and free men secure in the knowledge they could forever cover up the murder of a U.S. president, and, not end up in oil drums and subterrenean apartments with two shots behind the ear. Or, go to hoosgow for terms no less than their full natural lives, or, even face constant legal pressure from various do-gooders in the system. How fortunate that Carlos never got brought down in BriLab like some street punk. The world of the Mafia would have been frothing with these type occurrences were it not for their successful hit on John Kennedy.

A more realistic appraisal of New Orleans before the murder is that it was used by the killers as a civilian patsy factory with a large population of compromisable male homosexuals there for recruitment. Remember: Lee Oswald wasn't the only patsy created in the conspiracy to murder the President. Include in this gallery of fronts and cutouts, Shaw and company, along with the Cubans, the mob, right wing activists, the FBI, CIA, and anything or anybody else that could plausibly be construed as civilian. In reality we know now they were simply egoistic fascist saps, used and then thrown away. But, U.S. cmdrs and key subordinates nurtured and managed the New Orleans civilian-framing operation, make no mistake about it, as surely as they managed the killings of important liberal leaders in the period before, during, and, after the 60s. Subsequently, we now learn that the other intended targets for assassination were liberal governance and its guiding philosophy - as no one currently in business, gov, or, media, qualify as liberal, nor, will there be anyone with this political philosophy occupying an influential position in these professions anytime, soon.

Got it - let us purge from history and our minds that he attended a picture show in his haste to flee

He didn't immediately flee Dallas. He didn't dip.

Got it - we should disregard Oswald's thwarted attempt to contact military intelligence on the night of the assassination. Anything else we should remain blind to?

No, the DoD controls the Senate.

Corona (rumor of contagion always precedes U.S. military invasions of sovereign nations ) , domestic mass casualty events, even most elections and certainly all major political campaigns (the best way to think of Democrats and Republicans is that they are Pentagon contractors vying for selection through corruptible electronic balloting) - all contain indicators of being psychological warfare missions, courtesy of Pentagon planners and the cmdrs and personnel of the military's two psychological operations divisions, often with partnerships between two or more branches.

Thanks, I'll be listening. I predict though, we'll hear something along the lines of 'due to national security concerns, at this time I cannot authorize blah blah blah, yada yada yada, the (duly authorized) release of remaining JFKA files'. The assassins own Presidents to the point that they're interchangeable, while their policies remain the same, throughout, always glaringly, and, dangerously similar to our Pentagon 'planners', and the sociopathic wish lists of their mentally unbalanced Chiefs.