Jump to content
The Education Forum

Dennis Berube

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Dennis Berube's Achievements

  1. Benjamin, the case for Hiss being a traitor is thin at best and VENONA certainly proves nothing. For starters, the original VENONA papers do not exist and no one ever was able to verify who "Ales" was including a 20 year hunt by the FBI. VENONA cable 1579 mentions the name Hiss in this context. "...has reported [gobbledygook] from the State Department by the name of HISS." Considering that Hiss was of course known to the Soviet Services as he actually held an official government position, this is a long way from proof of anything. The idea that a double agent would be referred to by his actual name or even "Ales" is a bit ridiculous and combined with no originals, is worthless. Russian general Vitaly Pavlov, who was head of KGB foreign intel in 1940 and working there the whole time this episode was going on, said "All of this is pure fabrication" in regards to Hiss and Hopkins. And it was. In my opinion, when you couple the Hiss/Hopkins/White saga with what happened to Wallace (by the Democratic party bosses), it seems rather clear that the deep state forces hated the psychological and political progress of the New Deal Democratic party.
  2. If your going to use the LAPD as though they are credible in this case, I think we are done here.
  3. Boy, that’s not very tenable imo, but I’ll bow out before we rampantly speculate the numbers.
  4. Yikes Steve. The brilliant Allard Lowenstein destroyed the Kranz report in 1977. I don't consider Kranz independent at all. He was active in the case blocking testimony, he was special counsel to the DA's office and admitted he wanted to become a DA. Real independence there. He never mentioned ANY of the MANY witnesses that described a point blank shot and cherry picked from their statements. “You must acknowledge that no one saw much of anything. And that’s what has always troubled me.” - Kranz again, good chuckles here
  5. W, check link below for further discussion. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccine-mandates-results-dont-safeguard-childrens-rights-or-health-how-did-we-get-here/ This link addresses that statistical manipulation. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-manipulated-data-create-pandemic-unvaxxed-narrative/
  6. The same way I would explain Democrats slamming Trump for withdrawing troops at that time and now supporting this mess, politics, theater, blame-game. Every cheerleader for any POTUS ever always seeks to blame negative things on the “other” guy. Considering what Biden did yesterday, I would've gambled on literally anyone else for POTUS. Naomi Wolf is right. https://rumble.com/vmas3g-a-biofascist-coup-was-declared-today.html
  7. How is Afghanistan an example of Trump being a sociopath? He didn’t start it and he brought some troops back if I remember correctly (which he was harshly criticized for on the left). He may or may not be a sociopath, but I completely fail to see Afghanistan being an example of that. The Biden withdrawal disaster had to have been planned imo and makes little tactical sense to choose the Kabul airport over other more easily defended options. I personally think the missing element to this is what Assange said in 2011 about Afghanistan. There are a lot of people with certain knowledge and documents that powerful people want to disappear that likely involves the missing $21 trillion in “unaccountable adjustments”. Assange called them the “transnational security organization” i think, something close to that anyway.
  8. Not even a coherent statement, it sounds like you read an MSM piece about RFK Jr instead of his actual works. He just won a big case against the FCC, apparently the courts find RFK Jr of sound mind. I’m sure you thank him for his heroic effort on behalf of all humans, the MSM didn’t. but this did get a laugh, thanks I love fantasies that involve statistical impossibility like more bullet holes/sounds than Sirhans gun could even hold, blanks or not.
  9. For those hypotheses referring to a lower level CIA plot…. How does a low level plot manage to get flag staff (and probably even JCS) officers into the autopsy room directing the operation? How does a low level plot get the intelligence agencies to remove the flash warning on Oswald? How does a low level plot have at least 1, but possibly 2-3 other similar plots involving different people and involve state department cover up help in the Chicago case? How does a low level plot get the secret service to illegally take the Presidents body at gunpoint? How does a low level plot get a civilian Dulles into a CIA facility that weekend doing god knows what? There are many more of these types of things, but without veering too deep… if the “official” narrative of this case and the 3 others like it at the same timeframe is to lie about the circumstances 50+ years later, a logical supposition would be that the forces with the most control over public information flow would be in some way responsible. Considering those forces are also the same forces with access to the alphabet agencies, I see this discussion as possibly intriguing, but ultimately limited in usefulness. If we can never get access to the critical information that would definitively answer these questions, we can never 100% know where the plot started and ended. Even if we could track it concretely to Dulles, you will never know if David Rockefeller asked him to do it in some way or not. Does anyone think the Bilderbergers were upset about the murder? In terms of history, viewing the 60’s assassinations as separate events is a shallow analysis that misses a big forest that is too important in understanding the modern world. In my opinion of course.
  10. My opinion is close to the opposite. There are almost always plots to assassinate leaders of state, very few succeed. The JFK plot clearly required "inside" covert help on a fairly significant level (secret service, car route, silencers, radios, transporting shooters, a patsy with pre-made backstory, penetration of DPD, FBI, etc...). That help only comes when the plot has been sanctioned at a higher level, not necessarily a higher level of "government. To me, the debate would be exactly what do we mean by "the top". I imagine after the steel crisis, David Rockefeller must have had some angry conversations with Dulles that would have given Dulles the "read" of the higher level and their intentions/desires. "...and he's screwing us in Vietnam, Cuba, Congo, Indonesia, Israel... between him and his damn brother...." They were potentially looking at more than 15 years of Kennedy political rule in this country, that would have likely destroyed the "Free market" globalized world plans that the Trade Mart/CFR types wanted (and now largely have obtained) so badly. The Democratic party would have likely been able to sustain itself as the New Deal party much longer and probably would have avoided the Clinton/WallStreet/NAFTA take down and disintegration of those remaining party elements. A statement as simple as "With RFK and Ted, we could be screwed for the next 20 years! That cannot happen!", from someone in the realm of a Rockefeller would likely have been enough to embolden the security/military people to assist a plot hatched at a lower level that they would have obviously been aware of with the anti-Castro people. The people "at the top" are the ones with the most to gain/lose and have a history of involvement in such things. The Morgan plot on FDR being one example. I would also put Dag's assassination in this category too, that certainly had a ton of risk, but these groups view themselves as invincible due to their control of the secret services and media outlets. Just because the top of the conspirators food chain is rarely revealed, does not mean that the conspiracy stopped at those we can identify and we all know that covert operations are designed that way from the ground up as a function of their purpose. We still don't even know what domestic operation Clay Shaw was a part of (to my knowledge) and he was exposed! Obviously, no public official would commit their name to a domestic murder operation, but I see it as unwise analysis to think that those people never had anything to do with illegal domestic operations, its a provable falsehood actually. I think the MLK, RFK, Malcom, and JFK cases taken together prove (to me anyway) that these events could have ultimately only come from the top as they show clear continuity of purpose, namely to alter the political power within the country by eliminating the most powerful leaders. I mean, the next Democratic presidents were Vietnam war starters, Trilateral Commission members and CIA drug traffickers. The 1960's was a crossroads for the world, but especially for America, whose course was dramatically and permanently shifted away from sovereign rule of law, to the rule of secret police forces and unaccountable covert operations/weaponry/banking. This shift could not have happened on the timeframe that it did without the majority of those assassinations in my opinion. They had too much public support to attempt to smear them or use the other control/blackmail solutions often employed.
  11. Remember, if you are attempting to remove America as the world's superpower, you need to embarrass the leadership to the rest of the world amongst many other things. In my opinion, this is another page in that chapter which will continue for several years. Remember that olive oil factory the US Army recently attacked (in a drill) by accident overseas?
  12. Roger, would you care to explain absolute vs relative risk in regards to that 95% figure? Have you seen the Israeli data showing vaccinated people dying at higher rates than non? The UK data showing the same? The MA CDC July study where 80% of hospitalizations and 74% of symptomatic cases were vaccinated? Have you seen the Pfizer bio-distribution paper out of Japan showing spike proteins going everywhere in the body? Have you heard Dr. Malone (co-inventor of mRNA vaccines) talk about the vaccine? Have you seen the Japan health minister stop over 1.6 million doses due to an unknown magnetic “contamination”? Have you seen the natural immunity study proving 13x more effectiveness than vaccines (Israeli study)?
  13. Me too. https://chriswaldburger.substack.com/p/bombshell-uk-data-destroys-entire https://mark-skidmore.com/2021/08/28/new-israeli-study-finds-fully-vaccinated-people-are-at-greater-risk-of-hospitalization-and-13-times-more-likely-to-catch-covid-19-than-those-who-have-recovered-and-have-natural-immun/ https://m.theepochtimes.com/japan-suspends-1-63-million-doses-of-moderna-vaccine-after-reports-of-contamination_3966233.html
  14. Much like how the JFK only gets any chance at objectivity on Fox, thus it is with covid. W, this should help your recent concerns. I mentioned this scientist earlier in reference to the Pfizer bio distribution study out of Japan. https://rumble.com/vksa5n-immunology-professor-byram-bridle-there-is-no-pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated-.html
  • Create New...