clintbradford

As we examine John Kennedy, we can not see the man he was without understanding that he was multi-faceted. And in the authors who now says that he was a wart hog in his personal behavior - they have never slept in a bed that Jack Kennedy slept in which sounds like this [Kerry twice raps the wooden podium soundly]. He slept on a piece of wood. To have him be the worlds greatest Lothario would have been a miracle - ladies and gentlemen. This is a man who not only never slept a whole night's sleep, if any of you in the out their in the room thinks that sound is particularly good to love making you are mistaken. He would be delighted to be thought of as the Errol Flynn of his era. And then he would have been angry, because it takes away from what he truly accomplished. Did he like the ladies? Yes. Did he find bright, fascinating people a challenge and a delight? Yes. Would many of you in this room, possibility, have been a friend? I think so. He would have, liked that many of you are published. All of you are considerate. And most of you are egotistical enough to match my cousin. As am I. - JFK cousin Kerry McCarthy, from a 1997 speech in Dallas ( http://www.jfk-info.com/km-sp1.htm )

>>What are their names and what are their credentials? > So far you have refused to disclose your full identity. Instead of answering the inquiry, you attack the message. I have completely disclosed my identity. Can -I- ask for the names of these alleged photographic experts without being personally attacked? Clint Bradford

>>...time constraints... There was absolutely no time in the chain of possession for this incredible amount of sinsister alterations to occur. And none of the proponents of alteration have ever been able to come up with WHERE and with what type of equipment this magical feat was performed. "I'm exhausted envisioning the logistics of this purported set of 'miracles'" - so says the gentleman who literally invented the emulsion type that Zapruder used that day, as he authenticated the Zapruder film footage. Clint Bradford http://www.jfk-info.com

A major problem with self-professed "JFK assassination researchers" is their lack of proper citations and methodology. For example, Jack White has recently again cited a 9-year-old paper by a "school principal" that backs ups Jack's claim of Zapruder film "alteration." What Jack doesn't do for us is to properly cite just exactly what the school principal was studying. I mean, nine years ago there were several copies of the Zapruder floating around - from the worthless-for-research contrasty, grainy copies bootlegged from the Clay Shaw-trial-era copy, to those with amateurish edits (like the Medio / MacMillan CD-ROM rendition). Heck, I have a copy of the Zapruder film that I can convince a crowd that shows Secret Service Agent Greer pointing a nickel-plated revolver at the President! (One of Jack White's friends, Roy Schaeffer, firmly believes that Greer shot at the President from the limo driver's position.) A responsible researcher would take this nine-year-old study and return to the author - with the best available copy of the Zapruder film available. And ask the researcher if all these "anomalies" appear in a piece of evidence whose heritage CAN be defined. But we will not see Jack White taking this responsible step. He wants us to believe that there are scores of ("30 seconds are missing!") "excised frames," "motionless people," "super-human movements," "stick people," "disappearing loads in the backs of pickups," "false shadows," "enlargement of only the background of the film by 130 percent," et al ad nauseum. Jack has used this "motionless people" claim several times over the years. But when confronted with evidence of very obvious motions (13 distinct motions) by another researcher five years ago, he backed down and admitted that they weren't really motionless. "Almost motionless," was the phrase Jack started to use. Then Jack started to tell people that MOTION WAS ADDED BACK IN to the Zapruder film in Frames 133 to about 196. Now he appears in this forum to start the silliness all over again. One would think that these "master alterationists" would have the President's head movement at the time of the final head shot(s) to move violently towards the front to bolster the single assassin theory. I mean, if they can re-position spectators...enter false shadows...repeat a line of spectators frame after frame without altering the background...alter the foreground only for several frames...(ALL things Jack White belies was done to the film) - then certainly they could have performed more editing to actually indicate bullet trajectory. Another item of note: None of those who claim that the Zapruder film was masterfully altered give any reasonable amount of time for the task to be accomplished...The chain of possession of the original and copies made in Dallas has been responsibly established. But don't ask those who have staked their reputations and made money off their "alterationist" nonsense to actually cite the time it would have taken to so masterfully have altered this footage and WHEN in the chain of possession it occurred. Clint Bradford

>>...So we have a film that could not have been altered that shows exactly the same thing the Zapruder film does during a critical part of the assassination... Now there's an assignment for students. Come up with ONE photo taken that day that refutes what is shown on the authenticated Zapruder film. None of the "alterationists" have been able to do so. And do they squirm when asked to! Here's a list of over 500 exposures from which to choose... http://www.jfk-info.com/photos1.htm >>...Noel Twyman... What Twyman wrote is now moot. Twyman has dropped out of the JFK research community, and has admitted that his book contained many incorrect conclusions. Clint Bradford http://www.jfk-info.com

JACK WHITE: It seems to me that a single image of the 20 spectators had been repeated over and over... Ahhh, yes - Jack's "cardboard cutout spectators" nonsense. As you read any writings by White on this matter, one must remember that Jack White has written that ALL images taken in and around Dealey Plaza that afternoon (upwards of 500 total exposures) were sinisterly seized and altered to fit Jack's theories. "THE FBI COLLECTED ALL AMATEUR MOVIES AND STILLS, AND DID NOT RETURN THEM FOR WEEKS..." Jack alleges. Of course, he nowhere backs up this absurd allegation with any facts. More on Jack's deteriorating analytic and critical thinking skills may be read at... http://www.jfk-info.com/jackvid2.htm Clint Bradford