Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'snake oil'.
Let's survey some of the most relevant crime reconstructions, past and current. The first one was not computerized. ============================================================================== (1) Year 1967. Financed and broadcast by CBS. According to a credible insider, it began with the best intentions, but morphed into a coverup. https://consortiumnews.com/2016/04/22/how-cbs-news-aided-the-jfk-cover-up/ Truth-o-Meter Verdict: NOT interested in the truth. ============================================================================== (2) Year 2003. Paid by ABC News, implemented by Dale Myers. Since Mr. Myers has every intention of taking the contents of his hard drive to his grave -as a good Egyptian- he cannot possibly be interested in full disclosure. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSBXW1-VGmM Truth-o-Meter Verdict: NOT interested in the truth. ============================================================================== (3) Year 2013. Broadcast by PBS, paid by the Koch brothers, implemented by Luke and Michael Haag. Despite requests, PBS will not disclose the laser measurements. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/jfk-single-bullet-theory-probed-using-latest-forensics-tech/ Truth-o-Meter Verdict: NOT interested in the truth. ============================================================================== (4) Year 2015. Implemented by Mark Messer, Martin Hinrichs, David Oldroyd, Ramon Herrera and a few other volunteers, some participants in this forum. Self funded, with very limited resources. The intention is to donate all the files to a university(s) and the National Archives. http://www.dealey-plaza.org https://www.linkedin.com/groups/3675239/3675239-6160509976092692480 http://simplymaya.com/forum/showthread.php?t=41914 Truth-o-Meter Verdict: Interested in the truth. ============================================================================== Conclusion: Initiative No. 4 is the first one and only one in its category. -Ramon ps: If there are hidden files, it is NOT Science.
What happens when an irresistible force meets an unmovable object? Well, it depends. The red arrow is the resultant vector. Accountants will recognize it as the bottom line. It is the final result after all the affecting forces are added. The simplest case is Case 2. A person is shot in the abdomen. The absence of vector denotes that the subject did not move. Imagine a red arrow of length 0 and therefore the angle is undefined. Due to the presence of a hard cranium, most shots in the head belong to Case No. 1. See five examples here in all their gory glory: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=22351&p=316489 This case is equivalent to a person being hit by a bus. The poor sap flies away in the same direction as the bus. Notice how the bullet and the vector combine their strengths. Case 3 is a toughie. For starters: (•) Is is extremely rare. (•) It is extremely weak (notice the tiny red vector). Think salmons swimming upstream. (•) It depends on an enclosed chamber in order to prosper.