Jump to content
The Education Forum

Where are the mainstream media?


Recommended Posts

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/07/09/2389/

Mainstream Media Where Are You?

by Paul Buchheit

A group of teachers in Chicago recently started an initiative to inform college and high school students about critical global issues. The initiative deals with young people who have a wide range of academic skills, who are generally hard-working and eager to find a suitable career, and whose savvy about modern culture makes up for their lack of life experience. But they know almost nothing about their country’s relationship with the world. They know there’s a war going on, they’ve heard about genocide in Africa, they suspect that Iran is a threat to the United States. But ask them to provide some details and they return a blank stare.

It is understandable that today’s youth, with so many entertainment options and electronic distractions, and with the pursuit of good times high on their list of priorities, can’t be sufficiently aware of world issues. But they do read newspaper headlines and occasionally watch the news. They simply don’t get enough information from these sources. If they hear at all about controversial issues, the information is oversimplified, incomplete, and often one-sided.

They need to know that the U.S. is responsible for almost half of the world’s total military expenditures, that nearly half of the arms sales to developing countries (in 2005) came from the United States, and that 20 of the top 25 recipients of U.S. arms sales in the developing world were declared undemocratic or human rights abusers by the U.S. State Department’s own Human Rights Report.

They need to know that the U.S. attempted to overthrow more than 40 foreign governments from the end of WW2 to the turn of the century, many of them populist and democratic movements that were battling oppressive regimes.

They need to know that the U.S. went to war with Iraq in 2003 because of erroneous claims that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and had ties to Al Qaeda.

They need to know that studies by 16 U.S. intelligence agencies, including the CIA, the FBI, the State Dept., and all four branches of the armed forces, revealed that the occupation of Iraq has contributed to an increase in the overall terrorist threat. And that studies by the University of Chicago, the Hoover Digest, the Cato Institute, Iraq Body Count, and the 2005 Human Security Report support these findings.

They need to know that the U.S. opposed United Nations votes on the right to food, the rights of women, the rights of children, and the right to freedom of people forcibly deprived of that right. That the U.S. opposed the banning of landmines. That the UN has accused the U.S. of repeatedly violating the World Convention against Torture, and that the UN voted the U.S. off the U.N. Human Rights Commission in 2001. And that at the end of 2006, 80% of the UN’s unpaid dues were owed by the United States.

They need to know that only eight corporations — Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch’s News Corporation, Viacom (formerly CBS), General Electric, Yahoo, Google, and MSN — now control most of the U.S. media, and that some of them have close connections to companies making weaponry for the U.S. military.

They need to know that while 3,000 Americans died in the horrible terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, every DAY of the year 30,000 children die of hunger and preventable diseases around the world. That the United Nations Human Development Report 2005 concluded that “The gap between the average citizen in the richest and in the poorest countries is wide and getting wider.” That the World Bank’s World Development Report 2006 stated that inequality in the U.S. is the worst in the developed world. That corporate income has risen much faster than workers’ wages, while the corporate tax rate has dropped dramatically over the past 50 years.

They need to know that U.S. foreign aid, based on percentage of income, is one of the lowest in the developed world. That most of our aid goes to relatively wealthy Israel and another ally, Egypt. That 70% of U.S. aid is ‘tied,’ which means that the recipient must use it to purchase U.S. goods and services. That even our impressive level of private aid is mostly confined to donations within the U.S., and in the form of remittances (money sent back to the home countries of people working in the United States).

They need to know that “free trade” is often skewed in favor of wealthy countries. That we give more economic aid to our own multinational companies than foreign aid to poor countries. That U.S. tariffs on countries like Viet Nam and Bangladesh are 10 times higher than on European Union countries. That according to Christian Aid, trade liberalization in the past 20 years has cost sub-Saharan Africa more than $272 billion, a staggering sum that could have erased all its debts while paying for vaccination and school for every child. That the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the New Economics Foundation, and the United Nations Report on the World Social Situation 2005 all reported that free trade has not helped the world’s poor.

Is it unpatriotic to criticize the behavior of one’s own country? It depends on the meaning of patriotism. Socrates angered people by challenging them in public and exposing their ignorance. But he felt he was acting as a patriot by encouraging thoughtfulness over blind acceptance and celebration of government policies. In words attributed to him, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” Like Socrates, Henry David Thoreau believed that citizens should tolerate nothing less from their government than the highest standards of behavior. He said, “Those who, while they disapprove of the character and measures of a government, yield to it their allegiance and support are undoubtedly its most conscientious supporters, and so frequently the most serious obstacles to reform.” Martin Luther King talked about moving “beyond the prophesying of smooth patriotism to the high grounds of a firm dissent based upon the mandates of conscience.”

But how do we know what’s true and what isn’t? Opinions derived from any one source may be inaccurate, or biased, or simply wrong. Our students in the Global Initiative are taught to research the issues, to seek multiple sources if there is any question about the truth. It can be hard work. Their job would be a lot easier if the newspapers and TV news shows would take on the big issues and make a realistic effort to provide balanced coverage.

Paul Buchheit is a professor with the Chicago City Colleges, co-founder of Global Initiative Chicago, and the founder of fightingpoverty.org. He has contributed to commondreams, counterpunch, and countercurrents.

Email: pbuchheit@ccc.edu

References

1 Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Yearbook

2006 ( http://yearbook2006.sipri.org/chap8)

2 “World Wide Military Expenditures”

(http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/spending.htm )

3 “U.S. Military Spending vs. the World,” Center for Arms Control and

Non-Proliferation, February 5, 2007

4 Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, 1998-2005,” CRS

Report for Congress, October 23, 2006

5 Frida Berrigan and William D. Hartung, with Leslie Heffel, “U.S.

Weapons at War 2005: Promoting Freedom or Fueling Conflict?” June 2005

6 “The G8: Global Arms Exporters: Failing to prevent irresponsible

arms transfers” Amnesty International, IANSA, Oxfam International,

June 2005

7 William Blum, “Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower”

(Common Courage Press, 2000)

8 “Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq,” by Thomas Ricks

(Penguin Books, 2006)

9 Robert A. Pape, “Suicide Terrorism and Democracy: What We’ve Learned

Since 9/11,” Cato Institute, September 8, 2006

10 “Why Gun-Barrel Democracy Doesn’t Work,” by Bruce Bueno de Mesquita

and George W. Downs, The Hoover Digest, January 23, 2006

(http://www.hooverdigest.org/042/bdm.html)

11 “Does U.S. Intervention Overseas Breed Terrorism? The Historical

Record,” by Ivan Eland, Cato Institute, December 17, 1998

(http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1568.htm)

12 “The Iraq Effect: War Has Increased Terrorism Sevenfold Worldwide,”

By Peter Bergen and Paul Cruickshank, Mother Jones, March 1, 2007

(http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex/2007/03/iraq_effect_1.html )

13 “Year Four: Simply the worst,” Press release 15: Iraq Body Count

March 18th 2007 (http://www.iraqbodycount.org/press/pr15.php)

14 “The Terrorism Index,” by Foreign Policy & The Center For American

Progress, July/August 2006

15 “Human Security Report 2005″

(http://www.humansecurityreport.info/content/view/28/63)

16 “US Position on International Treaties,” Updated July, 2003

(http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/tables/treaties.htm)

17 “Why do people hate America?” by Ziauddin Sardar and Merryl Wyn

Davies (Disinformation Co., 2002)

18 “Convention on the Rights of the Child,” UNICEF

(http://www.unicef.org/crc/index_30229.html)

19 “U.S. Opposes Right to Food at World Summit,” Peter Rosset, Food

First, June 30, 2002

20 Human Rights Watch World Report 2006 (www.hrw.org)

21 United Nations Population Fund, January 2006

( http://www.unfpa.org/support/friends/34million.htm)

22 “US acknowledges torture at Guantanamo; in Iraq, Afghanistan - UN

06.24.2005

( http://www.forbes.com/work/feeds/afx/2005/...fx2110388.html)

23 “U.S. ousted from U.N. Human Rights Commission,” cnn.com, May 3,

2001 ( http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/05/03/us.human)

24 “UN approves Human Rights Council over US opposition,” University

of Pittsburgh School of Law, March 15, 2006

25 “U.S. Will Not Join Landmine Treaty”

(http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2004_03/Rademaker.asp)

26 “Global Governance Initiative: Annual Report 2006″

( http://www.weforum.org/pdf/Initiatives/GGI_Report06.pdf)

27 “What Every American Should Know About Who’s Really Running the

World,” by Melissa Rossi (Plume Books, 2005)

28 “Human Security Report,” Human Security Centre, 2005

(www.humansecurityreport.info)

29 “UN Finance,” Global Policy Forum, accessed February 2007

(http://www.globalpolicy.org/finance )

30 Ben Bagdikian, “The New Media Monopoly” (Beacon Press, 2004)

31 “Big Six U.S. TV Companies,” TVNewsday, April 21, 2006

32 “And then there were eight: 25 years of media mergers, from GE-NBC

to Google-YouTube,” Mother Jones, March 2007

33 Jeffrey D. Sachs, “The End of Poverty” (Penguin Press, 2005)

34 United Nations: Human Development Report 2005

( http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2005/pd..._chapter_2.pdf)

35 “Historical Income Tables - Income Equality,” U.S. Census Bureau,

May 2004

36 United Nations Human Development Report 2005

37 World Bank, “World Development Report 2006″

38 “The Income Gap,” US News & World Report, January 22, 2007

39 “Income Gap Is Widening, Data Shows,” New York Times, March 29, 2007

40 “Two Americas: One Rich, One Poor? Understanding Income Inequality

in the United States” by Robert Rector and Rea Hederman, Jr., August

24, 2004 ( http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/bg1791.cfm)

41 “The Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Through 2006: The Latest CTJ Data, June

22, 2006 (http://ctj.org/pdf/gwbdata.pdf )

42 “New IRS Data Show Income Inequality Is Again on the Rise,” By

Isaac Shapiro, October 17, 2005 (http://www.cbpp.org/10-17-05inc.htm)

43 “The Decline of Corporate Income Tax Revenues,” by Joel Friedman,

October 24, 2003 (http://www.cbpp.org/10-16-03tax.htm)

44 World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United

Nations University (UNU-WIDER), “The World Distribution of Household

Wealth,” December 5, 2006

45 “Corporate Tax Dodgers: The Decline in U.S. Corporate Taxes and the

Rise in Offshore Tax Haven Abuses,” Center for Corporate Policy

46 “Americans on Foreign Aid and World Hunger: A Study of U.S. Public

Attitudes, Program on International Policy Attitudes,” 2001 and 2006

47 “Official Development Assistance increases further - but 2006

targets still a challenge,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and

Development, 11/04/2005

48 “Development aid from OECD countries fell 5.1% in 2006,”

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, March 4, 2007

49 “Human Development Report 2005,” United Nations

(hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2005/pdf/HDR05_chapter_3.pdf)

50 “Stingy Samaritans: Why Recent Increases in Development Aid Fail to

Help the Poor,” By Pekka Hirvonen, Global Policy Forum, August 2005

51 “Foreign Aid: An Introductory Overview of U.S. Programs and

Policy,” Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress,

January 19, 2005

52 “Foreign Aid: An Introductory Overview of U.S. Programs and

Policy,” Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress,

April 15, 2004 ( http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/trade/files/98-

916.pdf

53 “Paying the Price: Why rich countries must invest now in a war on

poverty,” Oxfam International 2005, Figure 10

( http://www.oxfam.org/en/files/pp041206_MDG.pdf)

54 “Tied Aid Strangling Nations, Says U.N.” by Thalif Deen, July 6,

2004

55 “The Index of Global Philanthropy 2006,” Carol Adelman, Center for

Global Prosperity (cgp.hudson.org)

56 “Think Again: U.S. Foreign Aid,” By Steven Radelet, Center for

Global Development, February 2005

( http://www.cgdev.org/docs/FP_Radelet_2_05.pdf)

57 Commitment to Development Index for 2005, Center for Global

Development (http://www.cgdev.org/section/initiatives/_active/cdi )

58 “Remittances aren’t charity, and one country does not make an

index,” by Steve Radelet, cgdev.org, April 13, 2006

59 “International comparisons of charitable giving,” Charities Aid

Foundation, November 2006

60 “Savage Subsidies,” By Michael Hogan, 03-28-06

(http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/view/3066/1/159 )

61 “Human Development Report 2005″

(http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2005)

62 “It Takes More than Free Trade to End Poverty,” By Joseph Stiglitz,

Former World Bank Chief Economist, February 3, 2006

(http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/bwi-wto/wto/2006/0203stiglitz.htm)

63 “A Compendium of Inequality: The Human Development Report 2005,” by

Jens Martens

64 “The economics of failure: The real cost of ‘free’ trade for poor

countries,” A Christian Aid briefing paper, June 2005

65 The Damage Done: Aid, Death and Dogma, Christian Aid 2005

66 “For Richer or Poorer: transforming economic partnership between

Europe and Africa, Christian Aid 2005

67 “Taking Liberties: Poor people, free trade and trade justice,”

Christian Aid 2004

68 “Effects of Financial Globalization on Developing Countries,” IMF

Occasional Paper 220, 2003.

69 “The Persistently Poor: An Internal Report Criticizes World Bank’s

Efforts on Poverty,” By Peter S. Goodman, Washington Post, December 8,

2006

70 “World Economy Giving Less to Poorest in Spite of Global Poverty,”

New Economics Foundation, January 23, 2006

71 “Globalization Will Increase Inequality in Developing Countries,”

South Centre, February 28, 2006

72 Amy Chua, “World On Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy

Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability” (New York: Anchor Books,

2004)

73 “Critical Patriotism,” By J. Peter Euben

(http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2002/02so/02sojeu.htm)

74 Henry David Thoreau, “Civil Disobedience”

( http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/Literature/Tho...obedience.html)

75 “A Time to Break Silence,” By Martin Luther King Jr., April 4th,

1967

Edited by Mark Stapleton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest David Guyatt

Quote:

Is it unpatriotic to criticize the behavior of one’s own country?

Unquote

I always get a mite jumpy when I hear Americans talking about what is Patriotic and what isn't. Surely, the argument must be that a citizen not only has a right, but arguably a duty, to criticise his countries leaders if they see things aren't right. But the major media are no longer the force for that. They are, to be blunt, a corporate motivated platform for corporate motivated advertising. Hard investigative journalism is dead.

If anybody doubts that statement they need merely to read what has been written by the mainstream media about 911 and then go out and collect the evidence that is avsilable themselves and form their own judgement about who was responsible -- using old fashioned common sense and deductive reasoning.

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

Is it unpatriotic to criticize the behavior of one’s own country?

Unquote

I always get a mite jumpy when I hear Americans talking about what is Patriotic and what isn't. Surely, the argument must be that a citizen not only has a right, but arguably a duty, to criticise his countries leaders if they see things aren't right. But the major media are no longer the force for that. They are, to be blunt, a corporate motivated platform for corporate motivated advertising. Hard investigative journalism is dead.

If anybody doubts that statement they need merely to read what has been written by the mainstream media about 911 and then go out and collect the evidence that is avsilable themselves and form their own judgement about who was responsible -- using old fashioned common sense and deductive reasoning.

David

I agree that citizens of any country have an obligation to criticize governmental wrongs and to read, view or listen to media with a good bit of skepticism (or even disbelief with respect to sources which have squandered their credibility chasing bad stories, etc.).

Our media in the US is primarily focused on stories about missing white coeds and American Idol and Dancing with the Stars finalists to the exclusion of the pursuit of truth in meaningful matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are, to be blunt, a corporate motivated platform for corporate motivated advertising.

Well put.

The worst aspect of the mainstream media in its present form is that it is wilfully distorting the truth concerning historical events like JFK's assassination, while at the same time denying the public its rightful role in shaping the course of history---all because of the stinking corporate oligarchy it serves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are, to be blunt, a corporate motivated platform for corporate motivated advertising.

Well put.

The worst aspect of the mainstream media in its present form is that it is wilfully distorting the truth concerning historical events like JFK's assassination, while at the same time denying the public its rightful role in shaping the course of history---all because of the stinking corporate oligarchy it serves.

The face of these corporations and the oil barons glows forth from FOX News Channel in the person of Shepard Smith. Just look at his face. He turns news into entertainment. He's the chief clown, chief obfuscator for the Military-Industrial Complex.

Kathy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...