Steven Tomlinson Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Why should it be considered such an impossibility that Harvey addressed and mailed the paper bag to a non-existent address? If he's working for someone that he doesn't trust, it's a good idea, similar to stamping 544 Camp Street on one occasion of his leafleting. If he had ended up in court, 544 Camp Street being basically the same location as Guy Banister would have been useful to him in claiming who he really worked for and if the mailed paper bag had been brought into evidence and maybe some 'other' interesting fingerprints found on it, then this also would have been of use to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now