Jump to content

Hillary Clinton and the JFK Assassination


Recommended Posts

Leo. B. Harley believes that Hillary Clinton was involved in the cover-up of the Assassination of JFK. You can read the article here:

http://www.freewebs.com/leobharley/

I had no idea that Hillary Clinton was a Goldwater supporter when she was young. Tony Blair was a Conservative until he met his wife at university. He then joined the Labour Party, CND, etc. However, once he gained power he emerged once again as a Conservative. According to one MI5 agent, Blair had been recruited to infiltrate the Labour movement. His relationship with his so-called left-wing wife was his "legend". He was a "sleeper" who eventually got to the top of the organization he was spying on. Is it possible that Hillary Clinton was recruited by the CIA as a student? Remember, she was also involved in the Watergate investigation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the topic of the Clintons and the CIA, Roger Morris' book Partners in Power is still very relevant even though it was published in 1996.

In it Morris has some very interesting things to say about the CIA's MHCHAOS (SP?) PROGRAM of student left infiltration. It relates to the time when Bill Clinton was in England in 1968 with his friend and future high mucky muck Strobe Talbot.

Morris was in the NSC under Johnson and Nixon but resigned over the invasion of Cambodia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leo. B. Harley believes that Hillary Clinton was involved in the cover-up of the Assassination of JFK. You can read the article here:

http://www.freewebs.com/leobharley/

I had no idea that Hillary Clinton was a Goldwater supporter when she was young. Tony Blair was a Conservative until he met his wife at university. He then joined the Labour Party, CND, etc. However, once he gained power he emerged once again as a Conservative. According to one MI5 agent, Blair had been recruited to infiltrate the Labour movement. His relationship with his so-called left-wing wife was his "legend". He was a "sleeper" who eventually got to the top of the organization he was spying on. Is it possible that Hillary Clinton was recruited by the CIA as a student? Remember, she was also involved in the Watergate investigation.

Her [and her hubby's] politics are cypto-Republican-Right, even if disguised in 'Liberal' sheep's clothing - just like Blair with the crypto-Conservative-Right philosophy disguised as 'Labour'....some Labour agenda he had!

What better than to infiltrate the opposition party and 'turn it'. As clever as it is evil. I just hope she is NOT the Democratic candidate. Very powerful forces are behind her and McCain to make sure they win either way.......Obama is no progressive, but he is a little less under complete control.

Obama is under complete control of a slightly different wing...the wing that was behind Carter.

Jack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leo. B. Harley believes that Hillary Clinton was involved in the cover-up of the Assassination of JFK. You can read the article here:

http://www.freewebs.com/leobharley/

I had no idea that Hillary Clinton was a Goldwater supporter when she was young. Tony Blair was a Conservative until he met his wife at university. He then joined the Labour Party, CND, etc. However, once he gained power he emerged once again as a Conservative. According to one MI5 agent, Blair had been recruited to infiltrate the Labour movement. His relationship with his so-called left-wing wife was his "legend". He was a "sleeper" who eventually got to the top of the organization he was spying on. Is it possible that Hillary Clinton was recruited by the CIA as a student? Remember, she was also involved in the Watergate investigation.

Her [and her hubby's] politics are cypto-Republican-Right, even if disguised in 'Liberal' sheep's clothing - just like Blair with the crypto-Conservative-Right philosophy disguised as 'Labour'....some Labour agenda he had!

What better than to infiltrate the opposition party and 'turn it'. As clever as it is evil. I just hope she is NOT the Democratic candidate. Very powerful forces are behind her and McCain to make sure they win either way.......Obama is no progressive, but he is a little less under complete control.

Obama is under complete control of a slightly different wing...the wing that was behind Carter.

Jack

I'd not argue the point. Obama is approved, under control and has controller advisors [visible and invisible]. I just sense he, as a person, might try to do some things [minor and a few] that the others would not..... We only get controlled candidates - yes, from various factions of the Oligarchy. This is what passes for 'democracy' and 'pluralism'. Ha!

One of the links in this story, which does not work, is http://xymphora.blogspot.com/barrels_of_laughter. The video link of Hillary on the Kupcinet show does not show Hillary. The post is dated April 1. Clearly an April Fool's joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leo. B. Harley believes that Hillary Clinton was involved in the cover-up of the Assassination of JFK. You can read the article here:

http://www.freewebs.com/leobharley/

I had no idea that Hillary Clinton was a Goldwater supporter when she was young. Tony Blair was a Conservative until he met his wife at university. He then joined the Labour Party, CND, etc. However, once he gained power he emerged once again as a Conservative. According to one MI5 agent, Blair had been recruited to infiltrate the Labour movement. His relationship with his so-called left-wing wife was his "legend". He was a "sleeper" who eventually got to the top of the organization he was spying on. Is it possible that Hillary Clinton was recruited by the CIA as a student? Remember, she was also involved in the Watergate investigation.

Her [and her hubby's] politics are cypto-Republican-Right, even if disguised in 'Liberal' sheep's clothing - just like Blair with the crypto-Conservative-Right philosophy disguised as 'Labour'....some Labour agenda he had!

What better than to infiltrate the opposition party and 'turn it'. As clever as it is evil. I just hope she is NOT the Democratic candidate. Very powerful forces are behind her and McCain to make sure they win either way.......Obama is no progressive, but he is a little less under complete control.

Obama is under complete control of a slightly different wing...the wing that was behind Carter.

Jack

I'd not argue the point. Obama is approved, under control and has controller advisors [visible and invisible]. I just sense he, as a person, might try to do some things [minor and a few] that the others would not..... We only get controlled candidates - yes, from various factions of the Oligarchy. This is what passes for 'democracy' and 'pluralism'. Ha!

One of the links in this story, which does not work, is http://xymphora.blogspot.com/barrels_of_laughter. The video link of Hillary on the Kupcinet show does not show Hillary. The post is dated April 1. Clearly an April Fool's joke.

Thank you Gary,

That's the way the cookie crumbles.

BK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leo. B. Harley believes that Hillary Clinton was involved in the cover-up of the Assassination of JFK. You can read the article here:

http://www.freewebs.com/leobharley/

I had no idea that Hillary Clinton was a Goldwater supporter when she was young. Tony Blair was a Conservative until he met his wife at university. He then joined the Labour Party, CND, etc. However, once he gained power he emerged once again as a Conservative. According to one MI5 agent, Blair had been recruited to infiltrate the Labour movement. His relationship with his so-called left-wing wife was his "legend". He was a "sleeper" who eventually got to the top of the organization he was spying on. Is it possible that Hillary Clinton was recruited by the CIA as a student? Remember, she was also involved in the Watergate investigation.

Hardly. I read her autobiography several years ago. There she made no secret out of the fact, that she was a Goldwater- Girl. I think she was just young and naive, and influenced by her father who was a straight republican.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the topic of the Clintons and the CIA, Roger Morris' book Partners in Power is still very relevant even though it was published in 1996.

In it Morris has some very interesting things to say about the CIA's MHCHAOS (SP?) PROGRAM of student left infiltration. It relates to the time when Bill Clinton was in England in 1968 with his friend and future high mucky muck Strobe Talbot.

Morris was in the NSC under Johnson and Nixon but resigned over the invasion of Cambodia.

When young Clinton went to england per ship in 1968, who was on board too(amongst those well selected Rhodes students)?-Believe it, or not: Bobby Baker. THE Bobby Baker. Clinton spent some time with Baker and his following on that trip.

(Source: Bill Clintons autobiography. German issue)

Edited by Karl Kinaski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leo. B. Harley believes that Hillary Clinton was involved in the cover-up of the Assassination of JFK. You can read the article here:

http://www.freewebs.com/leobharley/

I had no idea that Hillary Clinton was a Goldwater supporter when she was young. Tony Blair was a Conservative until he met his wife at university. He then joined the Labour Party, CND, etc. However, once he gained power he emerged once again as a Conservative. According to one MI5 agent, Blair had been recruited to infiltrate the Labour movement. His relationship with his so-called left-wing wife was his "legend". He was a "sleeper" who eventually got to the top of the organization he was spying on. Is it possible that Hillary Clinton was recruited by the CIA as a student? Remember, she was also involved in the Watergate investigation.

This is not answered simply. Hillary gave an interview to Newsweek many years ago stating that she was a Goldwater Republican until she read Carl Oglesby's book Containment and Change. Then she became a Democrat and anti view nam supporter. Later she trveled to Boston and met with Carl to discuss with him her transition.

However, none of this precludes that both Clinton's were not recruited by the CIA. There has long been rumors that Bill's

Rhodes travels were really under CIA guise. I have heard for years that the Clinton's are a CIA couple. And everyone knows that SDS and the peace movement were completely infiltrated by spies. So Hillary's words to Newsweek and to Carl could well be true, they did both run TX for McGovern. BUT one does not rise to the level of power to which they rose without some HEAVY (=bad) backers. As for Obama, I agree with what Jack White posted. (I did vote for him as the lesser of the evils). But these are very scary times for the US and the world. Until the truth about OP Mockingbird, and JFK (etc) assassination(s) is OUT front and center we are governed by the same powers regardless of the candidate. I believe 100% that the Clinton's know who killed JFK (too many reasons, the above, and that they had AIB co -author (Government By Gunplay) Sid Blumental in such a high level position in the WH- his nickname was "GK" (Grassy Knoll) but they did nothing. Keep in mind HSCA recommendation that the Justice Dept follow up. Yes Bill appointed members of AARB, but in terms of the justice we NEED Bill Clinton wase "no Jack Kennedy". Why? Fear of murder or part of coverup.

Dawn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ANYONE WHO WANTS TO COMBAT LIES AND IGNORANCE AND TO WRITE THE TRUTH MUST OVERCOME AT LEAST FIVE DIFFICULTIES: -

(1) THEY MUST HAVE THE COURAGE TO WRITE THE TRUTH WHEN TRUTH IS EVERYWHERE OPPOSED;

(2) THE KEENNESS TO RECOGNIZE IT, ALTHOUGH IT IS EVERYWHERE CONCEALED;

(3) THE SKILL TO MANIPULATE IT AS A WEAPON;

(4) THE JUDGMENT TO SELECT THOSE IN WHOSE HANDS IT WILL BE EFFECTIVE;

(5) AND THE CUNNING TO SPREAD THE TRUTH AMONG SUCH PERSONS.

(- BERTOLD BRECHT (GERMANY 1935) )

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leo. B. Harley believes that Hillary Clinton was involved in the cover-up of the Assassination of JFK. You can read the article here:

http://www.freewebs.com/leobharley/

One of the links in this story, which does not work, is http://xymphora.blogspot.com/barrels_of_laughter. The video link of Hillary on the Kupcinet show does not show Hillary. The post is dated April 1. Clearly an April Fool's joke.

Thank you Gary,

That's the way the cookie crumbles.

BK

I've already locked horns with this character, Leo B Harley, aka Jerome Lowe. He wants to run a conspiracy site, but he allows deliberate bull---- on his site. He writes that Karyn Kupcinet knew Bobby Baker and became one of his call girls -- she never knew that guy. Mary Jo Kopechne and Karyn went to the same college and were the same age. Mary Jo went to Caldwell College for women in NJ. Karyn, who quit college after one semester, went to Pine Manor in the town of Wellesley. However both she and her mother let agents, etc., think she did go to Wellesley. She never knew Mary Jo. I'd love to see the tape of teenage Hillary with a pink ribbon in her hair on Kup's Show. Then, Harley stole my theory about Paul Dorfman having Karyn killed to distract Chicago away from Ruby or Mobsters connected to the Assassination. And to abolish Irv's investigation into Ruby. Then Harley copyrights my theory. His tale is full of holes. When I emailed him about Karyn, he answered, "Who's paying you?" and called my concerns "irrelevant piffle." That's what he thinks of Karyn Kupcinet. I just want to say that I never took a dime off KK. And my obsession comes from the heart.

Kathy Collins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the links in this story, which does not work, is http://xymphora.blogspot.com/barrels_of_laughter. The video link of Hillary on the Kupcinet show does not show Hillary. The post is dated April 1. Clearly an April Fool's joke.

I hope it's an April Fool's Joke. The show wasn't even Kup's Show. Irv was being interviewed by another talk show host. In that segment, at least, Irv was the only guest.

Kathy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Tony Blair was a Conservative until he met his wife at university. He then joined the Labour Party, CND, etc. However, once he gained power he emerged once again as a Conservative. According to one MI5 agent, Blair had been recruited to infiltrate the Labour movement. His relationship with his so-called left-wing wife was his "legend". He was a "sleeper" who eventually got to the top of the organization he was spying on.”

John, I just can’t buy this.

I was and still am of the opinion that the late John Smith, Neil Kinnock and Tony Blair all did their bit in moving the Labour party to the centre of British politics. Changing its focus to the needs of a modern market economy and making it a viable alternative to the Tory party in the eyes of the British electorate.

Chris Brown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Tony Blair was a Conservative until he met his wife at university. He then joined the Labour Party, CND, etc. However, once he gained power he emerged once again as a Conservative. According to one MI5 agent, Blair had been recruited to infiltrate the Labour movement. His relationship with his so-called left-wing wife was his "legend". He was a "sleeper" who eventually got to the top of the organization he was spying on.”

John, I just can’t buy this.

I was and still am of the opinion that the late John Smith, Neil Kinnock and Tony Blair all did their bit in moving the Labour party to the centre of British politics. Changing its focus to the needs of a modern market economy and making it a viable alternative to the Tory party in the eyes of the British electorate.

Chris Brown.

"A viable alternative to the Tory party"!? Did somebody really just write those words? New Labour are neither alternative nor viable and very soon they will receive an electoral thrashing for neglecting their core political base by "moving …to the centre".

And what do New Labour apologists really mean when they say "the centre”. Do you mean an unprincipled acceptance of the neo-con political agenda, whether that’s illegal wars, rampant privatisation, tax cuts for the rich, slavish subservience to big business or any other such “needs of a modern market economy”? Because that's the reality.

New Labour now has its grubby little fingers over every millimetre of this “middle ground” but it doesn’t seem to have done its popularity much good.

When it does all eventually go bottoms up (and recent polls spell a humiliating disaster for this most pompous of governments) who will their apologists blame then? It used to be the “Loony Left”; they always had them as the scapegoat for previous Labour Leaders’ futile attempts to show big business “how to run the capitalist system”!

Here’s a delicious irony. Neil Kinnock spent most of his leadership struggling to expel The Militant (a small left wing faction inside the Labour Party) on the grounds that it was an “entryist organisation” with ideas “alien to democratic socialism”. Year upon year was spent hounding this tiny organisation, even when unemployment was at an all time record, the miners were fighting for their lives and millions lived in fear of the dole, Kinnock, leader of the Official Opposition, saw fit to persist in this hounding, goaded on by the press, and goaded on by his bloated ambitions, until finally, he received his just reward – two election defeats! Ah yes, the irony… Here’s Kinnock valiantly kicking out left wing, predominantly working class, “entryists” when all the while the left wing party he ostensibly ‘lead’ was stealthily being taken over by right wing, predominantly middle class, Tory entryists! You couldn’t write it!

The role of the Labour party was long ago transformed from a radical socialist campaigning organisation to no more than a safety valve; a ‘legitimate’ way for workers to let off political steam, to stop them from drawing revolutionary conclusions, but always harnessed by a right wing leadership and herded by future promises of a vague ‘socialist’ mirage: promises they had no intentions of fulfilling, even if they had the power to do so.

By bowing to the inevitable dictats and irrepairable contradictions of a free market economy the Labour Party ultimately (and knowingly!) create despair and disillusionment thus preparing the ground for a new Conservative Government, who then have the authority to push the political agenda further and further to the right. And so it goes on…

So be warned America: Hilary or Obama won’t make a jot of difference. They’ll be no more than a breathing space, a consolidating period, holding the fort for the next wave of assaults from a re-charged Republican Party who will have a legitimate mandate to go even further than this time. Iraq? Iran? Small potatoes. Try China. Or Russia.

But first a dose of ‘liberal’ democracy is needed to lull the masses, to disillusion them with false promises, so that the right can return with a vengeance.

Terrifying!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Tony Blair was a Conservative until he met his wife at university. He then joined the Labour Party, CND, etc. However, once he gained power he emerged once again as a Conservative. According to one MI5 agent, Blair had been recruited to infiltrate the Labour movement. His relationship with his so-called left-wing wife was his "legend". He was a "sleeper" who eventually got to the top of the organization he was spying on.”

John, I just can’t buy this.

I was and still am of the opinion that the late John Smith, Neil Kinnock and Tony Blair all did their bit in moving the Labour party to the centre of British politics. Changing its focus to the needs of a modern market economy and making it a viable alternative to the Tory party in the eyes of the British electorate.

Chris Brown.

"A viable alternative to the Tory party"!? Did somebody really just write those words? New Labour are neither alternative nor viable and very soon they will receive an electoral thrashing for neglecting their core political base by "moving …to the centre".

And what do New Labour apologists really mean when they say "the centre”. Do you mean an unprincipled acceptance of the neo-con political agenda, whether that’s illegal wars, rampant privatisation, tax cuts for the rich, slavish subservience to big business or any other such “needs of a modern market economy”? Because that's the reality.

New Labour now has its grubby little fingers over every millimetre of this “middle ground” but it doesn’t seem to have done its popularity much good.

When it does all eventually go bottoms up (and recent polls spell a humiliating disaster for this most pompous of governments) who will their apologists blame then? It used to be the “Loony Left”; they always had them as the scapegoat for previous Labour Leaders’ futile attempts to show big business “how to run the capitalist system”!

Here’s a delicious irony. Neil Kinnock spent most of his leadership struggling to expel The Militant (a small left wing faction inside the Labour Party) on the grounds that it was an “entryist organisation” with ideas “alien to democratic socialism”. Year upon year was spent hounding this tiny organisation, even when unemployment was at an all time record, the miners were fighting for their lives and millions lived in fear of the dole, Kinnock, leader of the Official Opposition, saw fit to persist in this hounding, goaded on by the press, and goaded on by his bloated ambitions, until finally, he received his just reward – two election defeats! Ah yes, the irony… Here’s Kinnock valiantly kicking out left wing, predominantly working class, “entryists” when all the while the left wing party he ostensibly ‘lead’ was stealthily being taken over by right wing, predominantly middle class, Tory entryists! You couldn’t write it!

The role of the Labour party was long ago transformed from a radical socialist campaigning organisation to no more than a safety valve; a ‘legitimate’ way for workers to let off political steam, to stop them from drawing revolutionary conclusions, but always harnessed by a right wing leadership and herded by future promises of a vague ‘socialist’ mirage: promises they had no intentions of fulfilling, even if they had the power to do so.

By bowing to the inevitable dictats and irrepairable contradictions of a free market economy the Labour Party ultimately (and knowingly!) create despair and disillusionment thus preparing the ground for a new Conservative Government, who then have the authority to push the political agenda further and further to the right. And so it goes on…

So be warned America: Hilary or Obama won’t make a jot of difference. They’ll be no more than a breathing space, a consolidating period, holding the fort for the next wave of assaults from a re-charged Republican Party who will have a legitimate mandate to go even further than this time. Iraq? Iran? Small potatoes. Try China. Or Russia.

But first a dose of ‘liberal’ democracy is needed to lull the masses, to disillusion them with false promises, so that the right can return with a vengeance.

Terrifying!

This is all very interesting, but I am surprised no one has mentioned,......[i do not know if it is true or folklore, hence I do not use the word "fact"] that Bill Clinton was one of the individuals who was at the airport when Hale Boggs entered into eternity, not that his being present, if that is the case denoted anything other than being at the wrong place at the wrong time.....Does it not seem odd that the Unsolved Mysteries genre has never delved into that topic. Heck, they never even found the plane......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Tony Blair was a Conservative until he met his wife at university. He then joined the Labour Party, CND, etc. However, once he gained power he emerged once again as a Conservative. According to one MI5 agent, Blair had been recruited to infiltrate the Labour movement. His relationship with his so-called left-wing wife was his "legend". He was a "sleeper" who eventually got to the top of the organization he was spying on.”

John, I just can’t buy this.

I was and still am of the opinion that the late John Smith, Neil Kinnock and Tony Blair all did their bit in moving the Labour party to the centre of British politics. Changing its focus to the needs of a modern market economy and making it a viable alternative to the Tory party in the eyes of the British electorate.

Chris Brown.

"A viable alternative to the Tory party"!? Did somebody really just write those words? New Labour are neither alternative nor viable and very soon they will receive an electoral thrashing for neglecting their core political base by "moving …to the centre".

And what do New Labour apologists really mean when they say "the centre”. Do you mean an unprincipled acceptance of the neo-con political agenda, whether that’s illegal wars, rampant privatisation, tax cuts for the rich, slavish subservience to big business or any other such “needs of a modern market economy”? Because that's the reality.

New Labour now has its grubby little fingers over every millimetre of this “middle ground” but it doesn’t seem to have done its popularity much good.

When it does all eventually go bottoms up (and recent polls spell a humiliating disaster for this most pompous of governments) who will their apologists blame then? It used to be the “Loony Left”; they always had them as the scapegoat for previous Labour Leaders’ futile attempts to show big business “how to run the capitalist system”!

Here’s a delicious irony. Neil Kinnock spent most of his leadership struggling to expel The Militant (a small left wing faction inside the Labour Party) on the grounds that it was an “entryist organisation” with ideas “alien to democratic socialism”. Year upon year was spent hounding this tiny organisation, even when unemployment was at an all time record, the miners were fighting for their lives and millions lived in fear of the dole, Kinnock, leader of the Official Opposition, saw fit to persist in this hounding, goaded on by the press, and goaded on by his bloated ambitions, until finally, he received his just reward – two election defeats! Ah yes, the irony… Here’s Kinnock valiantly kicking out left wing, predominantly working class, “entryists” when all the while the left wing party he ostensibly ‘lead’ was stealthily being taken over by right wing, predominantly middle class, Tory entryists! You couldn’t write it!

The role of the Labour party was long ago transformed from a radical socialist campaigning organisation to no more than a safety valve; a ‘legitimate’ way for workers to let off political steam, to stop them from drawing revolutionary conclusions, but always harnessed by a right wing leadership and herded by future promises of a vague ‘socialist’ mirage: promises they had no intentions of fulfilling, even if they had the power to do so.

By bowing to the inevitable dictats and irrepairable contradictions of a free market economy the Labour Party ultimately (and knowingly!) create despair and disillusionment thus preparing the ground for a new Conservative Government, who then have the authority to push the political agenda further and further to the right. And so it goes on…

So be warned America: Hilary or Obama won’t make a jot of difference. They’ll be no more than a breathing space, a consolidating period, holding the fort for the next wave of assaults from a re-charged Republican Party who will have a legitimate mandate to go even further than this time. Iraq? Iran? Small potatoes. Try China. Or Russia.

But first a dose of ‘liberal’ democracy is needed to lull the masses, to disillusion them with false promises, so that the right can return with a vengeance.

Terrifying!

Well said Bernie!

It was like that here (and maybe there) with Special Branch infiltrating all the local left groups and parties. Some of them were so small, just three people and two of them would be from Special Branch. Meanwhile, plenty of Chinese/Vietnamese restaurants were getting blown up and torched by the local right wing and racists groups. The local ANC guy had his house bombed. The Ustasha bombed a building in the city and had military training camps all over the country. Then of course the secret service go and blow up the Hilton Hotel before the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting so they can get more money and blame it on the Anada Marga. Unfortunately some people got killed on that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...