Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions

[David G. Healy]

Defend the Warren Commission Report findings? The 45 Questions

Question #04

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend

the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two

semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the

xxxxx listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most

of the 'answers'.

*reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...*

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************

Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's

only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message

threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):

**22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh

Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply

deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or

simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill

files.

source: alt.conspiracy.jfk

**********************************************************************

Surprising no long term readers of this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk --dgh), the first three questions have

gone by with nothing more than ad hominem and denials.

4. Why did so many credible eyewitnesses point to the front of the limo as the

source of shots being fired? If eyewitness testimony is unreliable, and the

claim is made that echoes were what was being heard, why were so many

eyewitnesses specific to the location? IOW’s, why didn’t anyone specify a shot

from the left?

It won't surprise most people to understand that all the eyewitness reports put

the shot origins in locations that can be understood as the TSBD and the Grassy

Knoll. But what the LNT'ers can't do is point to all those people who *must*

have described shots coming from *other* directions... after all, one of their

favorite explanations for the second location is "echoes"... where would real

echoes be coming from? Buildings, of course. So where are they?

And most damaging of all, how can they explain those few eyewitnesses who

reported shots from both locations? (They can't... all they seem capable of

doing is pointing out how few of them did so - a sad argument when it's obvious

that so many people were *NOT* asked where the shots came from.)

Once again the evidence points directly to a conspiracy, and contradicts the

Warren Commission's Report.

eof

Edited April 20, 2008 by David G. Healy