Jump to content
The Education Forum

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions


Recommended Posts

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions

Question #06

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend

the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two

semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the

xxxxx listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most

of the 'answers'.

*reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...*

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************

Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's

only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message

threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):

**22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh

Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply

deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or

simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill

files.

source: alt.conspiracy.jfk

**********************************************************************

6. James Chaney, a police motorcycle officer was less than a dozen feet away,

and looking directly at JFK during the shooting (according to both his

statements, and the Altgen's photo of him). We *KNOW* that his testimony would

have been devastating to the SBT - since we know that Chaney asserted that the

bullet that struck JFK was a different one than the one that struck Connally.

Mr. BELIN - What other officers did you talk to and what did they say that you

remember?

Mr. BAKER - I talked to Jim Chaney, and he made the statement that the two shots

hit Kennedy first and then the other one hit the Governor.

Mr. BELIN - Where was he?

Mr. BAKER - He was on the right rear of the car or to the side, and then at that

time the chief of police, he didn't know anything about this, and he moved up

and told him, and then that was during the time that the Secret Service men were

trying to get in the car, and at the time, after the shooting, from the time the

first shot rang out, the car stopped completely, pulled to the left and stopped.

Mr. BELIN - The President's car?

Mr. BAKER - Yes, sir. Now, I have heard several of them say that, Mr. Truly was

standing out there, he said it stopped. Several officers said it stopped

completely.

Mr. DULLES - You saw it stop, did you?

Mr. BAKER - No, sir; I didn't see it stop.

Mr. DULLES - You just heard from others that it had stopped?

Mr. BAKER - Yes, sir; that it had completely stopped, and then for a moment

there, and then they rushed on out to Parkland.

Knowing, from this testimony, that Chaney would have testified to a pattern of

shots that would have contradicted their SBT theory, can anyone defend the

Warren Commission's honesty in failing to question James Chaney directly? Why

was he never questioned by the FBI or Warren Commission prior to the release of

the WCR?

And why will *NO* LNT'er or xxxxx present a reasonable, non-conspiratorial

answer to that question?

eof

Edited by David G. Healy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...