Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions

[David G. Healy]

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions

Question #20

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend

the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two

semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the

xxxxx listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most

of the 'answers'.

*reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...*

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************

Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's

only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message

threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):

**22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh

Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply

deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or

simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill

files.

source: alt.conspiracy.jfk

**********************************************************************

I've decided to repost this one - since no-one has even tried to answer it. If

those who believe the Warren Commission Report want to defend it - they *MUST*

answer these questions... running away from them, or claiming that they are

"dead on arrival" or have "already been answered" simply won't do the trick.

If there are any honest LNT'ers out there - I won't hold you to trying to

justify McAdams lies about this - just answer the first question below.

The last two posts have been "ignored" by the trolls... let's see if I'm on a

roll or not:

20. Why did the CIA have a program of harassment of CT authors, and why did they

actively promote the WCR through their friendly news contacts? (Interestingly,

this same pattern happened again in the RFK murder case - although here it was

the LAPD that took to harassing CT journalists and researchers.)

See

http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/....do?docId=954...

for citation...

Everyone knows that intelligence consists of finding out what the other

government doesn't want you to know, but the other side of the coin that isn't

as well known is that intelligence *ALSO* consists of putting out the story that

you want the other side to believe. So what interest did the CIA have in

promoting the WCR, and harrassing CT authors? Does anyone believe their

essentially "patriotic" excuse? Can anyone propose a reasonable

non-conspiratorial explanation for their interest and involvement?

eof