Jump to content
The Education Forum

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions


Recommended Posts

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions

Question #22

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend

the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two

semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the

xxxxx listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most

of the 'answers'.

*reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...*

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************

Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's

only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message

threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):

**22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh

Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply

deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or

simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill

files.

source: alt.conspiracy.jfk

**********************************************************************

I've decided to repost this one - since no-one has even tried to answer it. If

those who believe the Warren Commission Report want to defend it - they *MUST*

answer these questions... running away from them, or claiming that they are

"dead on arrival" or have "already been answered" simply won't do the trick.

If there are any honest LNT'ers out there - I won't hold you to trying to

justify McAdams lies about this - just answer the first question below.

22. Why is there no 'chain of evidence' on so much of the evidence in this case?

CE399, for example, almost no-one who originally handled it will identify it.

The shells at the Tippet scene, for another. Why were autopsy technicians

forbidden from doing ordinary marking for X-ray identification?

"Secrecy, deception, dissembling, and suppression characterized the official

investigations, not to mention careless haphazard handling of evidence. The

failure of the authorities to seal off the scene of the crime, to photograph

vital evidence in place, to provide an unbroken chain of possession of the

evidence, and their ability to 'lose' or 'misplace' such crucial evidence as the

president's brain and the Harper fragment, necessarily leave numerous questions

unanswered. It should be emphasized that the assassination was a crime under

Texas state law. To ensure the accuracy of the above remarks, I discussed the

evidence at length with two acknowledged authorities on both Texas and United

States law, former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas and former Watergate

special prosecutor and assistant Texas attorney general Leon Jaworski. After

reviewing the evidence and its handling by the authorities, both Fortas and

Jaworski unhesitatingly declared that "VIRTUALLY ALL OF THE EVIDENCE

GATHERED BY THE AUTHORITIES WOULD EVENTUALLY HAVE BEEN DISALLOWED

BECAUSE OF THE SHAMEFULLY INCOMPETENT AND SINISTER MANNER IN WHICH

IT WAS HANDLED."

- The JFK Assassination Debates by Michael Kurtz, pg 49-50, emphasis mine.

Can any LNT'ers defend the official actions of the DPD, FBI, and Secret Service

in this case?

eof

Edited by David G. Healy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...