David G. Healy Posted May 6, 2008 Share Posted May 6, 2008 (edited) Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions Question #22 Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the xxxxx listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most of the 'answers'. *reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...* But first, an important note: ********************************************************************** Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks. These trolls include (but are not limited to): **22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill files. source: alt.conspiracy.jfk ********************************************************************** I've decided to repost this one - since no-one has even tried to answer it. If those who believe the Warren Commission Report want to defend it - they *MUST* answer these questions... running away from them, or claiming that they are "dead on arrival" or have "already been answered" simply won't do the trick. If there are any honest LNT'ers out there - I won't hold you to trying to justify McAdams lies about this - just answer the first question below. 22. Why is there no 'chain of evidence' on so much of the evidence in this case? CE399, for example, almost no-one who originally handled it will identify it. The shells at the Tippet scene, for another. Why were autopsy technicians forbidden from doing ordinary marking for X-ray identification? "Secrecy, deception, dissembling, and suppression characterized the official investigations, not to mention careless haphazard handling of evidence. The failure of the authorities to seal off the scene of the crime, to photograph vital evidence in place, to provide an unbroken chain of possession of the evidence, and their ability to 'lose' or 'misplace' such crucial evidence as the president's brain and the Harper fragment, necessarily leave numerous questions unanswered. It should be emphasized that the assassination was a crime under Texas state law. To ensure the accuracy of the above remarks, I discussed the evidence at length with two acknowledged authorities on both Texas and United States law, former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas and former Watergate special prosecutor and assistant Texas attorney general Leon Jaworski. After reviewing the evidence and its handling by the authorities, both Fortas and Jaworski unhesitatingly declared that "VIRTUALLY ALL OF THE EVIDENCE GATHERED BY THE AUTHORITIES WOULD EVENTUALLY HAVE BEEN DISALLOWED BECAUSE OF THE SHAMEFULLY INCOMPETENT AND SINISTER MANNER IN WHICH IT WAS HANDLED." - The JFK Assassination Debates by Michael Kurtz, pg 49-50, emphasis mine. Can any LNT'ers defend the official actions of the DPD, FBI, and Secret Service in this case? eof Edited May 6, 2008 by David G. Healy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now