Jump to content
The Education Forum

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions


Recommended Posts

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions

Question #28

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend

the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two

semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the

xxxxx listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most

of the 'answers'.

*reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...*

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************

Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's

only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message

threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):

**22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh

Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply

deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or

simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill

files.

source: alt.conspiracy.jfk

**********************************************************************

I've decided to repost this one - since no-one has even tried to answer it. If

those who believe the Warren Commission Report want to defend it - they *MUST*

answer these questions... running away from them, or claiming that they are

"dead on arrival" or have "already been answered" simply won't do the trick.

If there are any honest LNT'ers out there - I won't hold you to trying to

justify McAdams lies about this - just answer the first question below.

Yesterday's question on the Altgen's photo - and why it contradicts the films

didn't have a single attempted response. Today's question is related... let's

see if the crowd that believes in the authenticity of the photos/X-rays/films

are willing to support their belief:

28. LNT'ers get really nervous and never seem to have any explanation for the

reported Limo slowdown/stop that took place in Dealey Plaza.

With dozens of eyewitnesses all reporting the slowdown/stop - and many of them

*highly* credible (such as the motorcycle cops who were *with* the limo),

LNT'ers really can't deny what happened.

So when it's pointed out that this *IS NOT SEEN* in the extant Z-Film - they all

immediately jump into a chorus of "Hallelujah Alvarez"... pointing out that

Alvarez found a slowdown in the film.

BUT IT CAN'T BE SEEN BY THE CASUAL VIEWER!!!

And Tony Marsh ran screaming away - and starting talking about something else

(ghost images) and refused to explain this... as *no* LNT'er has been able to

do.

LNT'ers just *hate* the eyewitnesses - even when they are forced to imagine the

eyewitnesses being correct, as in this case.

Any LNT'ers care to explain what Tony ducked? Why is a slowdown *NOT SEEN IN THE

EXTANT Z-FILM TO THE CASUAL VIEWER?*

eof

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions

Question #28

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend

the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two

semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the

xxxxx listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most

of the 'answers'.

*reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...*

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************

Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's

only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message

threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):

**22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh

Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply

deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or

simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill

files.

source: alt.conspiracy.jfk

**********************************************************************

I've decided to repost this one - since no-one has even tried to answer it. If

those who believe the Warren Commission Report want to defend it - they *MUST*

answer these questions... running away from them, or claiming that they are

"dead on arrival" or have "already been answered" simply won't do the trick.

If there are any honest LNT'ers out there - I won't hold you to trying to

justify McAdams lies about this - just answer the first question below.

Yesterday's question on the Altgen's photo - and why it contradicts the films

didn't have a single attempted response. Today's question is related... let's

see if the crowd that believes in the authenticity of the photos/X-rays/films

are willing to support their belief:

28. LNT'ers get really nervous and never seem to have any explanation for the

reported Limo slowdown/stop that took place in Dealey Plaza.

With dozens of eyewitnesses all reporting the slowdown/stop - and many of them

*highly* credible (such as the motorcycle cops who were *with* the limo),

LNT'ers really can't deny what happened.

So when it's pointed out that this *IS NOT SEEN* in the extant Z-Film - they all

immediately jump into a chorus of "Hallelujah Alvarez"... pointing out that

Alvarez found a slowdown in the film.

BUT IT CAN'T BE SEEN BY THE CASUAL VIEWER!!!

And Tony Marsh ran screaming away - and starting talking about something else

(ghost images) and refused to explain this... as *no* LNT'er has been able to

do.

LNT'ers just *hate* the eyewitnesses - even when they are forced to imagine the

eyewitnesses being correct, as in this case.

Any LNT'ers care to explain what Tony ducked? Why is a slowdown *NOT SEEN IN THE

EXTANT Z-FILM TO THE CASUAL VIEWER?*

eof

Perhaps out resident photo expert/researcher Bill Miller (sic) can give this one a whirl -- awfully quiet for an expert...

Edited by David G. Healy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...