Jump to content
The Education Forum

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions


Recommended Posts

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions

Question #35

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend

the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two

semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the

xxxxx listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most

of the 'answers'.

*below question reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...*

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************

Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's

only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message

threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):

**22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh

Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply

deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or

simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill

files.

source: alt.conspiracy.jfk

**********************************************************************

35. From the Jan 27th Executive Session:

***************************************

Mr. Rankin. Then there is a great range of material in regard to the wounds, and

the autopsy and this point of exit or entrance of the bullet in the front of the

neck, and that all has to be developed much more than we have at the present

time.

We have an explanation there in the autopsy that probably a fragment came out

the front of the neck, but with the elevation other shot must have come from,

and the angle, it seems quite apparent now, since we have the picture of where

the bullet entered in the back, that the bullet entered below the shoulder blade

to the right of the backbone, which is below the place where the picture shows

the bullet came out in the neckband of the shirt in front, and the bullet,

according to the autopsy didn't strike any bone at all, that particular bullet,

and go through.

*****************************************

"Below the shoulder blades?"

"probably a fragment came out the front of the neck?"

Can you point to any statement in the current existing Autopsy

report that would support these statements?

Was Rankin simply mistaken? Under what conditions could he come up with such a

mistaken impression of what the Autopsy Report said?

eof

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...