David G. Healy Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions Question #36 Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the xxxxx listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most of the 'answers'. *below question reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...* But first, an important note: ********************************************************************** Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks. These trolls include (but are not limited to): **22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill files. source: alt.conspiracy.jfk ********************************************************************** 36. Why was their such an amazing amount of clumsiness when it came to the assassination films? The Z-film being broke in several places, the Muchmore film being broke right at one of the head shots, the Nix Film reportedly returning in a different condition from when it was taken from him? This isn't to mention the number of eyewitnesses who reported their film taken *and never returned* eof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted May 20, 2008 Author Share Posted May 20, 2008 (edited) Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questionsQuestion #36 [...] 36. Why was their such an amazing amount of clumsiness when it came to the assassination films? The Z-film being broke in several places, the Muchmore film being broke right at one of the head shots, the Nix Film reportedly returning in a different condition from when it was taken from him? This isn't to mention the number of eyewitnesses who reported their film taken *and never returned* eof Just a few of those unfortunate (Lone Nut) coincidences, perhaps? Perhpas our resident "JFK/Dealey PLaza assassination film-photos" expert (Bill Miller) would care to comment. After all these years of dedicated film analyzing work, he surely has drawn a few conclusions, at least ONE anyway..... Take it away Bill Miller.... Edited May 20, 2008 by David G. Healy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Kiehl Posted May 20, 2008 Share Posted May 20, 2008 nice DH.....bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now