Jump to content
The Education Forum

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions


Recommended Posts

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions

Question #36

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend

the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two

semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the

xxxxx listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most

of the 'answers'.

*below question reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...*

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************

Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's

only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message

threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):

**22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh

Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply

deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or

simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill

files.

source: alt.conspiracy.jfk

**********************************************************************

36. Why was their such an amazing amount of clumsiness when it came to the

assassination films? The Z-film being broke in several places, the Muchmore film

being broke right at one of the head shots, the Nix Film reportedly returning in

a different condition from when it was taken from him? This isn't to mention

the number of eyewitnesses who reported their film taken *and never returned*

eof

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions

Question #36

[...]

36. Why was their such an amazing amount of clumsiness when it came to the

assassination films? The Z-film being broke in several places, the Muchmore film

being broke right at one of the head shots, the Nix Film reportedly returning in

a different condition from when it was taken from him? This isn't to mention

the number of eyewitnesses who reported their film taken *and never returned*

eof

Just a few of those unfortunate (Lone Nut) coincidences, perhaps? Perhpas our resident "JFK/Dealey PLaza assassination film-photos" expert (Bill Miller) would care to comment. After all these years of dedicated film analyzing work, he surely has drawn a few conclusions, at least ONE anyway.....

Take it away Bill Miller....

Edited by David G. Healy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...