Jump to content
The Education Forum

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions


Recommended Posts

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions

Question #43

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend

the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two

semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the

xxxxx listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most

of the 'answers'.

*below question reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...*

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************

Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's

only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message

threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):

**22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh

Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply

deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or

simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill

files.

source: alt.conspiracy.jfk

**********************************************************************

LNT'er cowardice continues... based on the lack of responses, lurkers would

imagine that there aren't any LNT'ers reading these posts... but the regulars

here know better... on to the next embarrassment for the LNT'er camp:

43. Admiral George Burkley was the only medically trained doctor to be present

at both Parkland and Bethesda, yet was strangely absent from any questioning by

the WC.

When the HSCA rolled around, despite a letter from Burkley's attorney, stating

that Burkley "has information in the Kennedy assassination indicating that

others besides Oswald must have participated.", the HSCA waited close to a year

before interviewing Dr. Burkley. Then, strangely enough, evidently never

questioned Dr. Burkley on his assertion that others must have participated in

the assassination.

Can anyone explain these curious facts in light of a *real* investigation?

eof

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...