Jump to content
The Education Forum

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions


Recommended Posts

Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions

Question #45

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend

the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two

semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the

xxxxx listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most

of the 'answers'.

*below question reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...*

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************

Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's

only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message

threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):

**22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh

Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply

deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or

simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill

files.

source: alt.conspiracy.jfk

**********************************************************************

We are finally at the end, and it's been downright shocking to see the cowardice

of those who are attempting to put forth the WCR's theory. That LNT'ers don't

even *try* to come up with non-conspiratorial explanations for the evidential

questions I've raised demonstrate persuasively just how lacking their faith in

the WCR is. Here's the last of the original 45 Questions:

45. Despite being widely hailed by the media as an "exhaustive study produced by

honorable and prestigious men", the Warren Commission Report was unable to find

any room in its 888 page report, or 26 volumes of supporting evidence for the

very first piece of paperwork generated in any murder case - the death

certificate.

Perhaps they just didn't have any room left? Can anyone defend this?

eof

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...