Jack White Posted November 4, 2008 Share Posted November 4, 2008 ...to study or for your collection. It was taken late in the afternoon, I think, likely by a FWST photographer. I got it from Penn Jones. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denis Pointing Posted November 4, 2008 Share Posted November 4, 2008 ...to study or for your collection. It was taken late in the afternoon, I think, likely by a FWST photographer.I got it from Penn Jones. Jack Excellent, thank you. Denis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 ...to study or for your collection. It was taken late in the afternoon, I think, likely by a FWST photographer.I got it from Penn Jones. Jack Thanks Jack. From memory i think this may be the image which was taken about 2:00PM ON THE 22/11/63 FROM A HELICOPTER. ( Cabluck ) ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted November 5, 2008 Author Share Posted November 5, 2008 ...to study or for your collection. It was taken late in the afternoon, I think, likely by a FWST photographer.I got it from Penn Jones. Jack Thanks Jack. From memory i think this may be the image which was taken about 2:00PM ON THE 22/11/63 FROM A HELICOPTER. ( Cabluck ) ? I am guessing at the date. Saturday there were floral arrangements all over. Sunday there were video trucks and crowds for the Jack Ruby transfer. Monday seems too late to be shooting newsworthy aerials. So I guessed Friday. I could be wrong. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kathleen Collins Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 ...to study or for your collection. It was taken late in the afternoon, I think, likely by a FWST photographer.I got it from Penn Jones. Jack Thanks Jack. From memory i think this may be the image which was taken about 2:00PM ON THE 22/11/63 FROM A HELICOPTER. ( Cabluck ) ? I am guessing at the date. Saturday there were floral arrangements all over. Sunday there were video trucks and crowds for the Jack Ruby transfer. Monday seems too late to be shooting newsworthy aerials. So I guessed Friday. I could be wrong. Jack Too bad this photo can't be resized in the TSBD doorway so we could see who's standing there, if it was taken on the 22nd. I'm looking for George HW Bush, of course. Kathy C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 There are only a few cars in the knoll parking lot. Where did the others go? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 There are only a few cars in the knoll parking lot. Where did the others go? correction: I beleive this to be the image taken on the 22/11/63 ( Cabluck ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 1-more image. Credit Miles: Slightly different timeline to Jacks image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wim Dankbaar Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Makes Ed Hoffman's story rather incredible, doesn't it? Wim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted November 5, 2008 Author Share Posted November 5, 2008 ...to study or for your collection. It was taken late in the afternoon, I think, likely by a FWST photographer.I got it from Penn Jones. Jack Thanks Jack. From memory i think this may be the image which was taken about 2:00PM ON THE 22/11/63 FROM A HELICOPTER. ( Cabluck ) ? I am guessing at the date. Saturday there were floral arrangements all over. Sunday there were video trucks and crowds for the Jack Ruby transfer. Monday seems too late to be shooting newsworthy aerials. So I guessed Friday. I could be wrong. Jack Of course I meant the Sunday TRANSFER OF OSWALD, not Ruby. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted November 5, 2008 Author Share Posted November 5, 2008 I had never before observed, before studying these enlargements, that Elm had THREE LANES. Main had FOUR LANES. Commerce had FOUR LANES. This means the lanes on Elm were 13.3 feet wide. The others had lanes 10 feet wide. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted November 5, 2008 Author Share Posted November 5, 2008 Why Duncan's theory does not hold up. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 (edited) ...to study or for your collection. It was taken late in the afternoon, I think, likely by a FWST photographer.I got it from Penn Jones. Jack Thanks Jack. From memory i think this may be the image which was taken about 2:00PM ON THE 22/11/63 FROM A HELICOPTER. ( Cabluck ) ? I am guessing at the date. Saturday there were floral arrangements all over. Sunday there were video trucks and crowds for the Jack Ruby transfer. Monday seems too late to be shooting newsworthy aerials. So I guessed Friday. I could be wrong. Jack Quote: Robin, No, the photo was taken on Monday, 11-25. See the large white cross on the south pasture? It arrived late on Sunday morning and was still there on Monday. See the rope line on Elm? That went up on Monday. Gary Edited November 5, 2008 by Robin Unger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 Even so Jack, I don't think an accomplice to an assassin would walk in the general direction of over a dozen witnessess to take a rifle apart. The dangers of doing so would be enormous. The assassin and accomplice would have been aware of the witnesses and would have known that they would have more than likely heard a shot from that area, which is exactly what some of them reported as well as the puff of smoke.Duncan[/b] When I met the Hoffman family in the Plaza and walked through Ed's story, one of the things that I noticed is that the Turner interview chose to have Ed right against the RR box, but the wording I heard that day was Ed saw the man go behind the RR box (from the angle at which he had to it). In other words, Ed saw the man walk towards the RR box and disappear behind it. I will also add that Ed had offered to take a polygraph test. Bill Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wim Dankbaar Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 Even so Jack, I don't think an accomplice to an assassin would walk in the general direction of over a dozen witnessess to take a rifle apart. The dangers of doing so would be enormous. The assassin and accomplice would have been aware of the witnesses and would have known that they would have more than likely heard a shot from that area, which is exactly what some of them reported as well as the puff of smoke. Duncan I agree completely. It's possible that Hofmann believes what he thinks he saw, and maybe that was partly in his dreams, or he expanded his recollection in his mind. The human brain does not always record things factually. Whatever the case, it is simply IMPOSSIBLE for the witnesses on the bridge not to have seen anything from what Hoffmann describes having seen from a much greater distance. Least of all it's possible that none of the witnesses saw Ed's "railroad man" dissassembling the rifle. Simmons, Dodd, Price they all said they RAN over to the picket fence where they saw the puff of smoke. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLd3O-Tch6o But hey, as long as Lancer conferences are filled with Hofmann stories, David Atlee Phillips is not turning over in his grave. Wim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now