Jump to content
The Education Forum

Fetzer replies to Thompson's constant goading


Jack White
 Share

Recommended Posts

Dr. Fetzer has posted an excellent reply to Tink Thompson at

http://jfkresearch.com/forum3/index.php?to...icseen#msg24590

I urge everyone to read it. The text is far too long to post here.

I provided several graphics for his paper, such as these two, which show the enlargement

of the Z background. There are other graphics included with his text.

Jack

Revised to fix minor error in graphic.

post-667-1228849692_thumb.jpg

post-667-1228888176_thumb.jpg

Edited by Jack White
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both frames are scaled the same, have the same aspect ratio, and

were taken from the Zapruder pedestal.

Jack

The hell you say! :ice

post-1084-1228893257_thumb.jpg

Hey...Miller gets my point! The frames do not match!

Jack

No you miss Millers point...you incorrectly scaled the two images. Try again next time. BTW, have you seen Dr. Johns thrashing of you and Fetzers LATEST moorman in the street silliness? When will you finally admit your errors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No you miss Millers point...you incorrectly scaled the two images. Try again next time. BTW, have you seen Dr. Johns thrashing of you and Fetzers LATEST moorman in the street silliness? When will you finally admit your errors?

How can Jack and fetzer not notice the scaling error between those two films???

By the way ... Who is Dr. Johns and is there a link to this thrashing???

Bill Miller

Edited by Bill Miller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No you miss Millers point...you incorrectly scaled the two images. Try again next time. BTW, have you seen Dr. Johns thrashing of you and Fetzers LATEST moorman in the street silliness? When will you finally admit your errors?

How can Jack and fetzer not notice the scaling error between those two films???

By the way ... Who is Dr. Johns and is there a link to this thrashing???

Bill Miller

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jfk-research...group&slk=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it might be interesting to align what Jack has supplied and what I shot with my B/H 414 on telephoto.

The first movie is my frame(sprocket holes included) reduced to 65% and placed over Phil's frame.

I believe they pretty well match each other except for the parallax factor ( curb line).

Movie2 in next post.

chris

Edited by Chris Davidson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This movie is a comparison between the Z frame and my frame.

I used this Z frame because the aspect ratio from this version more closely matches my film.

In order to get the sprocket holes and frame size the same, I had to reduce only the Z frame WIDTH by 5%.

The rotation of the frames in both movies was 2-2.5 degrees.

Parallax still a factor, but not sure if that should affect the distance between wall holes and tree.

Phil's and my frames obviously were not in the same filming position, yet the wall holes and tree line up.

chris

Edited by Chris Davidson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW,

This is what it looks like on the wide angle/normal setting.

If it helps.

chris

I got a different result. The z frame and Phils recreation frame are a very good alignment, curb, tree and holes when properly sized. You frame however is the oddball. It missses both other frames on the distance tree to hole and curb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...