Obama and chemtrails

[Jack White]

Obama’s Plan To “Geo-Engineer” The Planet Mirrors CFR Policy Documents

Radical terraforming programs come from elite Internationalists

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Thursday, April 9, 2009

The Obama administration’s announcement that it is to consider radical planetary “geo-engineering”, such as “shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays”, exactly mirrors recent publications penned by the elite Council On Foreign Relations.

Yesterday the Associated Press reported that the Obama administration has held discussions regarding the possibility of “geo-engineering” the earth’s climate to counter global warming.

The AP report states that Obama’s science advisor John Holdren is pushing for radical terra forming programs to be explored such as creating an “artificial volcano”. Despite Holdren’s admission that such measures could have “grave side effects,” he added that, “we might get desperate enough to want to use it.”

Such ideas exactly mirror those put forth by the CFR in previous years.

In briefing notes (PDF) published in May 2008 from the CFR’s Geoengineering: Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering, the elite internationalist group lays out the exact same radical ideas now being touted by the Obama administration.

The following excerpts are taken from the document:

Geoengineering Strategies

Among all geoengineering schemes, those currently considered most feasible involve increasing the planetary albedo, that is, reflecting more sunlight back into space before it can be absorbed. There are a number of different methods that could be used to increase the planet’s reflectivity:

1. Add more small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere (the stratosphere which is located between 15 and 50 kilometers above the Earth’s surface).

2. Add more clouds in the lower part of the atmosphere (the troposphere)

3. Place various kinds of reflecting objects in space either near the earth or at a stable location between the earth and the sun.

4. Change large portions of the planet’s land cover from things that are dark (absorbing) such as trees to things that are light (reflecting) such as open snowcover or grasses.

Stratospheric Aerosols that might be engineered to migrate to particular regions (e.g. over the arctic) or to rise above the stratospher (so as not to interfere in stratospheric chemistry).

Adding more of the right kind of fine particles to the stratosphere can increase the amount of sunlight that is reflected back into space.

Applied to geoengineering, various technologies could be used to loft particles into the stratosphere, such as naval guns, rockets, hot air balloons or blimps, or a fleet of highflying aircraft. Potential types of particles for injection include sulfur dioxide, aluminum oxide dust or even designer self-levitating aerosols.

The CFR’s geo-engineering research program is directed by David G. Victor a Professor at Stanford Law School and an Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Also involved are M. Granger Morgan, head of Carnegie Mellon University’s Department of Engineering, Jay Apt, Professor of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University, and John Steinbruner, Professor of Public Policy and Director of the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland.

In an article entitled The Geoengineering Option: A Last Resort Against Global Warming? published in this month’s Foreign Affairs, the CFR’s monthly magazine, the directors once again lay out their ideas for planetary terraforming, calling for a worldwide 60-80 percent cut in carbon emissions.

Obama’s push toward a so called “cap and trade” carbon taxation program is also a direct descendant of Victor et al’s CFR policy formation.

A CFR geo-engineering meeting summary document from 1999 (PDF pages 12,13,14) also categorically states that the ultimate goal under “A technology strategy for global warming” is the implementation of a global Carbon Tax.

The memo also pedantically explains how the perceived fear of global warming can be used to sell to Americans what is essentially a tax on air:

“While taxing tea pales in comparison to taxing air as a perceived government affront, the clear benefits of a taxation policy to combat global warming might convince even the descendents of our tax-resistant Founding Fathers.”

The tentative announcement by the Obama administration of the existence of geoengineering research programs is a first step toward introducing the idea to the wider public.

However, as we highlighted in our master article yesterday, geo-engineering is undoubtedly already being conducted by government-affiliated universities, government agencies, and on a mass scale through chemtrail spraying.

Such programs merely scratch the surface of what is likely to be a gargantuan and overarching black-budget funded project to terraform the planet, with little or no care for the unknown environmental consequences this could engender.

Further Research: Here is an extremely valuable file folder containing 8 PDFs, all published by the CFR, and all concerning their Geo-Engineering Program.

Research related articles:

1. Council on Foreign Relations on Planetary Geoengineering: “Add more small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere”

2. Obama To Consider Geoengineering Climate

3. Barack Obama criticised for failure to signal change in foreign policy

4. Geoengineering may be tech’s answer to global warming

5. Brzezinski: Obama Will Face “Imminent” Foreign Policy Problems

6. WHO GETS WHAT: Obama plan has billions for cops

7. ABC Reporters Team Up with Environmental Activists on Planet Green

8. Ron Paul: Obama Foreign Policy Identical To Bush

9. The Government Is Already “Geo-Engineering” The Environment

10. Obama climate plan costs $2 trillion

11. ‘Sunshade’ global-cooling plan would ruin solar power

12. The Obama Deception - Now Streaming For Prison Planet.tv Members!

[Jack White]

Covering a Wisconsin sky.

[Evan Burton]

AERODYNAMIC CONTRAIL EFFECTS WATCHED

German researchers say aerodynamic condensation trails form by airflow over an aircraft's wing at high altitude need to be factored into climate models being developed to determine the effect of air traffic on global warming.

In certain conditions, says the German aerospace center (DLR), the pressure drop over the wing forms a stream of extremely small ice particles, which grow larger the farther they are from the aircraft, reflecting different wavelengths of light and creating an iridescent trail. While conventional engine contrails generally form in temperature zones and over the poles when the air is colder than 40C (F?), DLR says aerodynamic contrails only form when the air is considerably warmer and there is sufficient water vapour. This makes them common in the subtropics and topic.

With high traffic growth rates forecast for south Asia, DLR says aerodynamic contrails need to be factored into modeling to determine the role of aviation in climate change.

Aviation Week & Space Technology, 6 April 2009, page 16

[Matthew Lewis]

Covering a Wisconsin sky.

And? So what? Looks like persistent contrails to me. How do you KNOW they aren't? They could very well be from an airliner in a holding pattern, or an AWACS or other air surveillance plane on a training mission, or a tanker on a refueling anchor. Any of those could fly a pattern as shown. What Jack has NOT shown is that there is any proof the trails are anything other than a normal contrail.