David G. Healy Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 (edited) **Darryl Weatherly on the Zapruder Film... (The Hoax of the Century: Decoding the Forgery of the Zapruder Film pg.475 (copyright 2004, Harrison Livingstone) ISBN 1-4120-4462-6 The biggest lie told about the film is that is the single most important piece of evidence in the case, when it is not possible for any artifact to have such importance. No matter what the film shows, it cannot tell us why the President was murdered, or what changed in American life and politics that day. It has never really mattered what the Zaprduer film showed. In the immediate aftermath of the assassination, all the authorities needed was to be able to credibly assert they knew what happened. Possession of a film of the shooting, and presentation of a few frames was enough. When the public lost faith in the Warren Report (if it ever had faith), the film was used as a distraction, to turn the discussion of the murder of John Kennedy into the puzzle of Dealey Plaza, an elaborate and never ending game. We humans have the unfortunate tendency to believe what we are told. We are told the Zapruder film is the"Kennedy Assassination Movie," and big and famous Hollywood directors buy this propaganda--and sell it to us,the "best evidence," and "The Film of the Century." So what else could it be? Perhaps a plaything, a toy to occupy the child in us all. A bone thrown to us dogs... **note: excerpt from the article printed in my (Weatherlys') book, Killing Kennedy, 1995. Say it ain't so Craig! Edited April 13, 2009 by David G. Healy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 **Darryl Weatherly on the Zapruder Film... (The Hoax of the Century:Decoding the Forgery of the Zapruder Film pg.475 (copyright 2004, Harrison Livingstone) ISBN 1-4120-4462-6 The biggest lie told about the film is that is the single most important piece of evidence in the case, when it is not possible for any artifact to have such importance. No matter what the film shows, it cannot tell us why the President was murdered, or what changed in American life and politics that day. It has never really mattered what the Zaprduer film showed. In the immediate aftermath of the assassination, all the authorities needed was to be able to credibly assert they knew what happened. Possession of a film of the shooting, and presentation of a few frames was enough. When the public lost faith in the Warren Report (if it ever had faith), the film was used as a distraction, to turn the discussion of the murder of John Kennedy into the puzzle of Dealey Plaza, an elaborate and never ending game. We humans have the unfortunate tendency to believe what we are told. We are told the Zapruder film is the"Kennedy Assassination Movie," and big and famous Hollywood directors buy this propaganda--and sell it to us,the "best evidence," and "The Film of the Century." So what else could it be? Perhaps a plaything, a toy to occupy the child in us all. A bone thrown to us dogs... **note: excerpt from the article printed in my (Weatherlys') book, Killing Kennedy, 1995. Say it ain't so Craig! Tell us it IS so Davie... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted April 13, 2009 Author Share Posted April 13, 2009 (edited) **Darryl Weatherly on the Zapruder Film... (The Hoax of the Century:Decoding the Forgery of the Zapruder Film pg.475 (copyright 2004, Harrison Livingstone) ISBN 1-4120-4462-6 The biggest lie told about the film is that is the single most important piece of evidence in the case, when it is not possible for any artifact to have such importance. No matter what the film shows, it cannot tell us why the President was murdered, or what changed in American life and politics that day. It has never really mattered what the Zaprduer film showed. In the immediate aftermath of the assassination, all the authorities needed was to be able to credibly assert they knew what happened. Possession of a film of the shooting, and presentation of a few frames was enough. When the public lost faith in the Warren Report (if it ever had faith), the film was used as a distraction, to turn the discussion of the murder of John Kennedy into the puzzle of Dealey Plaza, an elaborate and never ending game. We humans have the unfortunate tendency to believe what we are told. We are told the Zapruder film is the"Kennedy Assassination Movie," and big and famous Hollywood directors buy this propaganda--and sell it to us,the "best evidence," and "The Film of the Century." So what else could it be? Perhaps a plaything, a toy to occupy the child in us all. A bone thrown to us dogs... **note: excerpt from the article printed in my (Weatherlys') book, Killing Kennedy, 1995. Say it ain't so Craig! Tell us it IS so Davie... that's what I like about Lone Nutters, nearly all don't have the nads to admit, they're Nutters.... You're not going to say the public has not lost all faith in the Warren Commission findings are ya? You evidently agree re the lie, "the film is that is the single most important piece of evidence in the case, eh?" Say it ain't so Craig! Edited April 13, 2009 by David G. Healy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted April 13, 2009 Share Posted April 13, 2009 (edited) **Darryl Weatherly on the Zapruder Film... (The Hoax of the Century:Decoding the Forgery of the Zapruder Film pg.475 (copyright 2004, Harrison Livingstone) ISBN 1-4120-4462-6 The biggest lie told about the film is that is the single most important piece of evidence in the case, when it is not possible for any artifact to have such importance. No matter what the film shows, it cannot tell us why the President was murdered, or what changed in American life and politics that day. It has never really mattered what the Zaprduer film showed. In the immediate aftermath of the assassination, all the authorities needed was to be able to credibly assert they knew what happened. Possession of a film of the shooting, and presentation of a few frames was enough. When the public lost faith in the Warren Report (if it ever had faith), the film was used as a distraction, to turn the discussion of the murder of John Kennedy into the puzzle of Dealey Plaza, an elaborate and never ending game. We humans have the unfortunate tendency to believe what we are told. We are told the Zapruder film is the"Kennedy Assassination Movie," and big and famous Hollywood directors buy this propaganda--and sell it to us,the "best evidence," and "The Film of the Century." So what else could it be? Perhaps a plaything, a toy to occupy the child in us all. A bone thrown to us dogs... **note: excerpt from the article printed in my (Weatherlys') book, Killing Kennedy, 1995. Say it ain't so Craig! Tell us it IS so Davie... that's what I like about Lone Nutters, nearly all don't have the nads to admit, they're Nutters.... You're not going to say the public has not lost all faith in the Warren Commission findings are ya? You evidently agree re the lie, "the film is that is the single most important piece of evidence in the case, eh?" Say it ain't so Craig! So tell me David, why would believing in the Warren commission or not have ANY bearing on the basic photographic principles as they apply to the Zapruder film? I really don't care what anyone considers to be the most important or least important evidence in the case, simply because I don't care about the OUTCOME of the case. Speaking of "nads" you or anyone in the fetzer cabal found any yet? www.craiglamson.com/costella.htm www.craiglamson.com/apollo.httm Edited April 13, 2009 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now