Jump to content
The Education Forum

The truth may take a long time...


Jack White
 Share

Recommended Posts

....

Good one Jack! "He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future." - Orwell

Many of us already know the basics of Dallas, 9-11 and other controlled and contrived past 'mis-history'; it is for the great majority of people, sadly, needed for those in power to come 'clean' and admit it. Many to most will see the Emperor with all his clothes [though butt naked] until the Emperor of Empire himself/itself admits there was a mistake. Sad. Lesson: Analyze and think things through for yourselves and don't trust authority! "Power concedes nothing without demand. It never has and never will."-Frederick Douglas. Also, 'Don't believe anything, until it is officially denied."

Peter here is a earlier example of history being controlled.........Jack great cartoon ,fits exactly ..best fellas b...

Edited by Bernice Moore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

....

Good one Jack! "He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future." - Orwell

Many of us already know the basics of Dallas, 9-11 and other controlled and contrived past 'mis-history'; it is for the great majority of people, sadly, needed for those in power to come 'clean' and admit it. Many to most will see the Emperor with all his clothes [though butt naked] until the Emperor of Empire himself/itself admits there was a mistake. Sad. Lesson: Analyze and think things through for yourselves and don't trust authority! "Power concedes nothing without demand. It never has and never will."-Frederick Douglas. Also, 'Don't believe anything, until it is officially denied."

Peter here is a earlier example of history being controlled.........Jack great cartoon ,fits exactly ..best fellas b...

Bernice...thanks for the "behind the scenes at CBS" Feinman script. I had not seen it.

Jack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YOUR WELCOME JACK...FROM SYLVIA MEAGHER TALKING ABOUT CHANGES....B...

Sylvia Meagher..Press Descriptions Wounds..

PRESS DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PRESIDENTS WOUNDS

"A wealth of discrepancies,distortions, and omissions impels one to conclude that the official autopsy report is unreliable; that the description of the President's wounds is innacurate ; that the single-missile theory is wholly unsupported by and in conflict with the evidence; that this theory respresents an attempt to salvage the case against Lee Harvey Oswald as a lone assassin; that the conclusions in the WR on the source,number,and perpetration of the shots are completely invalid; and that the evidence in fact constitutes proof of conspiracy.."..Sylvia Meagher...1967.

Press Descriptions:

"In the first days and weeks after the assassination news stories constantly revised the number, location, and nature of the President's wounds..

At Parkland Hospital according to the Doctors, he has suffered and entrance wound at the Adam's apple and a massive wound in the head."

New York World-Telegram and Sun: Nov.23/63..p.2

New York Times :Nov.24/63..p2.col 6.

New York Post : Nov.24/63..p2.col 3

"The official theory to account for those wounds was that the President had been shot while his car was approaching the Book Depository Building".

New York Herald-Tribune, Nov.27/63.pp1& 9

"That was soon dropped in favor of a new theory; that he was shot on Elm Street while the car was moving away from the Book Depository, when he turned backward to wave at the crowd".

Paul Mandel,"End to Nagging Rumors:" The Six Critical Seconds."

Life, Dec.4/63.p.52F,col 2.

"That was dropped in turn when films of the assassination showed that the President was facing forward at the strategic time.On site tests were conducted on Dec.5,1963 by the Secret Service-----presumably with the autopsy report in hand,Com.doc.at the NA consists of a receipt for various items ,including ""one copy of autopsy report and notes of the examing doctor"", turned over to Robert I.Bouck of the Secret Service Research Section by the White House physician on November 26,1963. The tests were conducted for the acknowledged purpose of determining how the President was shot in the front from behind."

The New York Times, Dec.6/63..p.6

"The experiment was not successful".

About 4 weeks after the assassination it became known that the SS had interviewed the Parkland doctors and informed of the autopsy findings.

(St.Louis Post-Dispatch,Dec18/63.)

A new version of the wounds was made public, which mentioned for the first time that the Pres. had been shot in the back.

(New YorkTimes,Washington Post,& St.Louis Post-Dispatch,Dec 18/63)

Some stories also said that the bullet that had struck his back "was found deep in his shoulder"

One story said the bullet had entered"five to seven inches below the collar line".

( Washington Post.Dec18/63 and May29/66 )

others said "several inches below the collar line"(The Washington Post said on May 29/66 that the information had been confirmed by the FBI before publication.)

It was now reported that the Parkland doctors now agreed that the entrance wound at the Adam's apple was now in reality an exit wound.

St.Louis Post-Dispatch,Dec.18/63..

Some reports of the autopsy findings that were leaked to the press contradicted each other as well as the official autopsy report ultimately published..

The New Tork Times stated on Dec.17/63,that the FBI report of Dec.9/63

revealed that one bullet had struck Kennedy where the right shoulder joins the neck and another had struck his RIGHT TEMPLE..

NY Times Dec.17/63.p31.cols 7-8.

The next day The NY Times published another report,from a "source fully acquainted with the results of the autopsy."

Now there was a small neat wound in the back that had penetrated two or three inches, and according to " the pathologists at Bethesda." the wound at the Adam's apple had been caused by a metal or bone fragment from the fatal head shot..

NY Times.Dec.18/63.p27,cols 4-6.

Within 24 hrs.The NY Times gave stillanother account, in which the pathologists were said to have found that the bullet in the back had lodged in Kennedy's body and that a second bullet had hit the RIGHT REAR of his HEAD...

NY Times.Dec 19/63, p23,col.1

The story added that a fragment of the bullet had passed out the front of the neck. More than a month later the Times was still reporting that a bullet had lodged in Kennedy's right shoulder.

NY Times.Jan 26/64,p.58,col.4

Thus for more than two months after the assassination the press asserted repeatedly that the first bullet to strike the President had entered several inches below the collar line and had lodged in the body. The same stories gave a variety of versions of the head wound: that a bullet had gone in and out of the back of the head according to Dr.Kemp Clark:

NY Post,Nov.24/63.p 2,col 3.

that a bullet struck the back of the head to the right;

NY Herald-Tribune,Nov.27/63.pp1 & 9.

that a bullet struck the right temple.

NY Times,Dec 17/63.p31,cols.7-8.

the back of the skull.

NY Times.Dec18/63.p.27,col5.

and the right rear of the head

NY Times Dec.29/63.col 1

The autopsy report, with it's presumably authoritative data, was not published: Dr.J.J. Humes, the chief autopsy surgeon, said that he had been forbidden to talk.

NY Times.Dec.6/63,p.18,col.7

"As one version of the wounds succeeded another with dizzying speed and confusion, only one constant remained: Oswald was the lone assassin and had fired all the shots from the sixth floor of the Book Depository. When facts came into conflict with that thesis ,the facts and not the thesis changed .Critics of the already implausible case against Oswald concluded from this that the truth was being suppressed and perverted in order to persuade the public, at all costs, to accept his sole guilt. Nothing that came to light later presented grounds for altering that conclusion..".

In Sept. 64 the WR provided the official version..According to the Report.

(1) President Kennedy was first struck by a bullet which entered at the back of his neck and exited through the lower front portion of his neck,causing a wound which would not necessarily have been lethal.The President was struck a second time by a bullet which entered the right-rear portion of his head,causing a massive and fatal wound.

(2) Goveror Connally was struck by a bullet which entered on the right side of his back and traveled downward through the right side of his chest,exiting below his right nipple.This bullet then passed through his right wrist and entered his left thigh where it caused a superficial wound.

WR.19

Elsewhere the Com expressed the view that the bullet had struck the Presdient first and exited through the front of his neck and then struck the Governor..and inflicted all his wounds.The Governor himself did not agree with that view, convinced he was hit by a second bullet after an earlier bullet struck the President.

Autopsy Report.

VOL.4.CE.387.. is Undated.

Chief Autopsy Surgeon: Commander J.J. Humes, burned his "preliminary draft notes"and handed over all other papers related to the report to "higher authorities",in a certificate dated Nov.24/63....but according to to his testimony he burnt the first draft of the autopsy report .(Vol.2.H 373)..He states all working papers had remained in his personal custody at all times: that his notes and handwritten draft of the final report were handed over to the commanding officer of the U.S.Medical School at 5pm.Nov.24/63.and that no papers remained in his possession.(Exh.CE 397.p48) Again conflict between the certification and the testimony: Humes told the Com.that the drawings of the wounds had been prepared on the basis of his memory and notes of the autopsy.(Vol.2H 349-350).These certificates suggest the official autopsy report was completed and handed over to the authorities two days after the death of the President.The document begins with a description of the circumstances of the assn.based,it is explained on "available information" and newspaper reports..

1.Absence of a date on autopsy report.

2.Unauthorized release of it's supported contents in Dec.63.

weeks after it was completed and handed over according to Dr.Humes.

3.Findings that were leaked, are completely inconsistant with the actual contents of the autopsy report.

4.On site tests by the SS.Dec.63,were based on findings different from those in the published autopsy report.

5.The certificates read as if they had been written, after a passage of time,as if to account for the disposition of documents at an earlier time.

Whether authentic or not,the evidence that the autopsy report was completed on Nov. 24/63..fails to account for the leaking of different autopsy findings on Dec.17 & 18th/63.or for the conduct of on site tests on Dec.5th. by the SS on the basis of findings other than those in the final document..

*******************************************

Information from "Accessories After The Fact"..Sylvia Meagher..

*******************************************

SOME may be interested....in seeing information within these below..

Master set of Medical Exhibits ARRB

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk...et/contents.htm

Medical reports Doctors of Parkland.

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk...eport_0270b.htm

B........

Edited by Bernice Moore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...