Jack White Posted November 18, 2009 Share Posted November 18, 2009 THE DARTMOUTH JFK-PHOTO FIASCO Author: Jim Fetzer and Jim Marrs Description: A Dartmouth computer scientist, Hany Farid, claims that it is "extremely unlikely" that backyard photographs of accussed assassin Lee Harvey Oswald are fake based on a digital analysis of shadows. Had he conducted a literature search, he would have known that the shadows are but one of multiple indications of fakery. Even if he were right about the shadows, he would be wrong about the photos, one of which was published in LIFE. Tags: Assassination, Books, Commission, Digital, Evidence, Head, IMAGE, JFK, Life, Police, Research, Time, Truth Article Location: http://www.opednews.com/articles/THE-DARTM...091116-941.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted November 18, 2009 Share Posted November 18, 2009 THE DARTMOUTH JFK-PHOTO FIASCOAuthor: Jim Fetzer and Jim Marrs Description: A Dartmouth computer scientist, Hany Farid, claims that it is "extremely unlikely" that backyard photographs of accussed assassin Lee Harvey Oswald are fake based on a digital analysis of shadows. Had he conducted a literature search, he would have known that the shadows are but one of multiple indications of fakery. Even if he were right about the shadows, he would be wrong about the photos, one of which was published in LIFE. Tags: Assassination, Books, Commission, Digital, Evidence, Head, IMAGE, JFK, Life, Police, Research, Time, Truth Article Location: http://www.opednews.com/articles/THE-DARTM...091116-941.html My god, how many things can Fetzer get wrong in a single article? Plenty it appears. He really should find something else to do with his time.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 THE DARTMOUTH JFK-PHOTO FIASCOAuthor: Jim Fetzer and Jim Marrs Description: A Dartmouth computer scientist, Hany Farid, claims that it is "extremely unlikely" that backyard photographs of accussed assassin Lee Harvey Oswald are fake based on a digital analysis of shadows. Had he conducted a literature search, he would have known that the shadows are but one of multiple indications of fakery. Even if he were right about the shadows, he would be wrong about the photos, one of which was published in LIFE. Tags: Assassination, Books, Commission, Digital, Evidence, Head, IMAGE, JFK, Life, Police, Research, Time, Truth Article Location: http://www.opednews.com/articles/THE-DARTM...091116-941.html My god, how many things can Fetzer get wrong in a single article? Plenty it appears. He really should find something else to do with his time.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Well, my God, Lamson! Here's your chance to take out me, Jim Marrs, Jack White, and a half-dozen other experts who agree with us. Show us your stuff! It's a well-defined, nicely focused issue. Show us how good you are! Do it now! THE DARTMOUTH JFK-PHOTO FIASCOAuthor: Jim Fetzer and Jim Marrs Description: A Dartmouth computer scientist, Hany Farid, claims that it is "extremely unlikely" that backyard photographs of accussed assassin Lee Harvey Oswald are fake based on a digital analysis of shadows. Had he conducted a literature search, he would have known that the shadows are but one of multiple indications of fakery. Even if he were right about the shadows, he would be wrong about the photos, one of which was published in LIFE. Tags: Assassination, Books, Commission, Digital, Evidence, Head, IMAGE, JFK, Life, Police, Research, Time, Truth Article Location: http://www.opednews.com/articles/THE-DARTM...091116-941.html My god, how many things can Fetzer get wrong in a single article? Plenty it appears. He really should find something else to do with his time.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 (edited) Well, my God, Lamson! Here's your chance to take out me, Jim Marrs, Jack White, and a half-dozen other experts who agree with us. White's claim to expertise wasdebunkedby the HSCA Marrs has made numerous false claims (i.e. JFK was getting rid of the Fed) LOL Fetzer’s definition of expert is “someone who agrees with me” He claimed that John Costella was "the leading technical expert on the (Zapruder) film" (1) and had "a specialty in optics" (2). This despite the fact that it's hard to argue that Costella was the leading expert on anything, he was a grammar school teacher and has never had a scientific article published in a peer review journal. He did publish three articles about TEACHING physics in a science education magazine and early version of his dissertation appeared in an obscure online journal. He doesn't have any experience or training in photography or optics on his CV other that a few unpublished papers (3). He has a Ph.D. but it is in theoretical physics a totally unrelated field. He also claimed that Charles N. Pegelow a structural engineer whose area of expertise is offshore oilrigs who (according to his CV) last worked on building as an unlicensed intern in the early 70’s, was the person most qualified to analysis the collapse of the WTC. Pegelow now believes the towers where demolished with nuclear weapons. When Fetzer became enamored with the theory the towers were destroyed by “star wars” weaponry he claimed Dr. Judy Wood "is easily the most highly qualified scientist studying 9/11” (4). Wood, a now unemployed professor of mechanical engineer whose area of expertise is (no I’m not making this up) is dental fillings (5) and whose CV doesn’t indicated any experience with construction or construction material 1) http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=2356 2) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FETZERclaimsDEBUNK/message/641 3) http://www.assassinationscience.com/johnco...sics/index.html 4) http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.ph...&pid=107385 5) http://iadr.confex.com/iadr/2005Balt/techp...tract_65017.htm , her CV [http://www.ces.clemson.edu/me/mefaculty/pdfs/Wood1.pdf ] was taken offline by Clemson. I tried finding it on the Internet Archive but they seem to be down right now http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.ce.../pdfs/Wood1.pdf Show us your stuff! It's a well-defined, nicely focused issue. Show us how good you are! Do it now! Amazing that Fetzer, behind whom trails dozens of debunked claims he refuses to defend or retract, wants others to reply to him immediately Edited November 19, 2009 by Len Colby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Baker Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Why should Craig Lamson bother to respond, given that Jim is incapable of engaging in sensible, logical argument? Fetzer describes himself as a scientist. It's up against some very stiff competition, but that has to be his most ridiculous and fallacious belief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 (edited) Well, my God, Lamson! Here's your chance to take out me, Jim Marrs, Jack White, and a half-dozen other experts whoagree with us. Show us your stuff! It's a well-defined, nicely focused issue. Show us how good you are! Do it now! THE DARTMOUTH JFK-PHOTO FIASCOAuthor: Jim Fetzer and Jim Marrs Description: A Dartmouth computer scientist, Hany Farid, claims that it is "extremely unlikely" that backyard photographs of accussed assassin Lee Harvey Oswald are fake based on a digital analysis of shadows. Had he conducted a literature search, he would have known that the shadows are but one of multiple indications of fakery. Even if he were right about the shadows, he would be wrong about the photos, one of which was published in LIFE. Tags: Assassination, Books, Commission, Digital, Evidence, Head, IMAGE, JFK, Life, Police, Research, Time, Truth Article Location: http://www.opednews.com/articles/THE-DARTM...091116-941.html My god, how many things can Fetzer get wrong in a single article? Plenty it appears. He really should find something else to do with his time.... And I shall jimbo, I shall. Not that it will matter, you never admit error anyway, but it will still be a gas! BTW jimbo, I already took you , Costella, Mantik, Lifton, Healy and White out and down for the count with this one. Yet you still pimp work that is based on a very false premise. Sheesh, you have no shame. www.craiglamson.com/costella.htm www.craiglamson.com/costella2.htm Edited November 19, 2009 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Why should Craig Lamson bother to respond, given that Jim is incapable of engaging in sensible, logical argument? Fetzer describes himself as a scientist. It's up against some very stiff competition, but that has to be his most ridiculous and fallacious belief. It's sport Paul... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karl Kinaski Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Well here they are, the Three Musketeers of a dead duck: Baker, Lamson, and Colby. But were is D ' Artangnan, aka Wild Billy Boy Milla?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 (edited) Well here they are, the Three Musketeers of a dead duck: Baker, Lamson, and Colby. But were is D ' Artangnan, aka Wild Billy Boy Milla?? Hey Karl, lets get you on the record shall we? Sure don't want to miss anyone when the boom comes crashing down now do we? Just a few simple questions... Is White's work on the backyard photos correct? If its correct, are any of his points wrong? If any are wrong, which points? Surely you can answer these very simple questions..... Edited November 19, 2009 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 There ought to be some educational benefits from an "education forum". Try these: My latest on JFK: http://assassinationscience.com/undfinal-f...ppened-JFK.html My latest of 9/11: http://twilightpines.com/JF-BuenosAires/Buenos-Aires.html My latest on Wellstone: http://www.youtube.com/w/?v=vyNzys-KutA Well here they are, the Three Musketeers of a dead duck: Baker, Lamson, and Colby. But were is D ' Artangnan, aka Wild Billy Boy Milla?? Hey Karl, lets get you on the record shall we? Sure don't want to miss anyone when the boom comes crashing down now do we? Just a few simple questions... Is White's work on the backyard photos correct? If its correct, are any of his points wrong? If any are wrong, which points? Surely you can answer these very simple questions..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 (edited) There ought to be some educational benefits from an "education forum". Try these:My latest on JFK: http://assassinationscience.com/undfinal-f...ppened-JFK.html My latest of 9/11: http://twilightpines.com/JF-BuenosAires/Buenos-Aires.html My latest on Wellstone: http://www.youtube.com/w/?v=vyNzys-KutA Well here they are, the Three Musketeers of a dead duck: Baker, Lamson, and Colby. But were is D ' Artangnan, aka Wild Billy Boy Milla?? Hey Karl, lets get you on the record shall we? Sure don't want to miss anyone when the boom comes crashing down now do we? Just a few simple questions... Is White's work on the backyard photos correct? If its correct, are any of his points wrong? If any are wrong, which points? Surely you can answer these very simple questions..... Latest! ROFLMAO! Hell you can't deal HONESTLY with your past! Remember these? www.craiglamson.com/costella.htm www.craiglamson.com/costella2.htm Edited November 19, 2009 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Well, my God, Lamson! Here's your chance to take out me, Jim Marrs, Jack White, and a half-dozen other experts whoagree with us. Show us your stuff! It's a well-defined, nicely focused issue. Show us how good you are! Do it now! This challenge has been followed, not by a studied response, but by more drivel of the kind you and Colby have patented. Where is it, Lamson? Don't recycle your endless horsexxxx of the past. What do we have wrong? Put up or shut up! Now! There ought to be some educational benefits from an "education forum". Try these:My latest on JFK: http://assassinationscience.com/undfinal-f...ppened-JFK.html My latest of 9/11: http://twilightpines.com/JF-BuenosAires/Buenos-Aires.html My latest on Wellstone: http://www.youtube.com/w/?v=vyNzys-KutA Well here they are, the Three Musketeers of a dead duck: Baker, Lamson, and Colby. But were is D ' Artangnan, aka Wild Billy Boy Milla?? Hey Karl, lets get you on the record shall we? Sure don't want to miss anyone when the boom comes crashing down now do we? Just a few simple questions... Is White's work on the backyard photos correct? If its correct, are any of his points wrong? If any are wrong, which points? Surely you can answer these very simple questions..... Latest! ROFLMAO! Hell you can't deal HONESTLY with your past! Remember these? www.craiglamson.com/costella.htm www.craiglamson.com/costella2.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 BTW jimbo, I already took you , Costella, Mantik, Lifton, Healy and White out and down for the count with this one. LMFAO The day that you take Fetzer, Lifton, Healy and White to town on anything related to the assassination is the day I will walk straight into a Combine that is plowing a field in your Indiana hometown Good job Jim and Jim, I enjoyed that read Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 (edited) BTW jimbo, I already took you , Costella, Mantik, Lifton, Healy and White out and down for the count with this one. LMFAO The day that you take Fetzer, Lifton, Healy and White to town on anything related to the assassination is the day I will walk straight into a Combine that is plowing a field in your Indiana hometown Good job Jim and Jim, I enjoyed that read Poor Dean, that Combine is REALLY gonna hurt. Read them again, kiss your wife and kids goodbye. www.craiglamson.com/costella.htm www.craiglamson.com/costella2.htm They all tried and failed to salvage Costella from his ignorant signpost blunder. They actually took themself down by BELIEVING, instead of knowing. Just like deano. BTW exactly how do you KNOW the Fetzer and Marrs morass was good? You claim no real study of the backyard phtoos, yet here you are doing some sheep like backslappin. lordy lordy, deano BELIEVES! And hey where are those three best Jack White studies that you say you have researched and validated? Cat got your tongue? Or is the combine closing in on your azz? Edited November 20, 2009 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now