Jack White Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 People keep telling me I have a BURDEN OF PROOF to provide such and such or do so and so. False. I have NO burden of proof to do or provide ANYTHING! To anyone! Period. I have studied the evidence for 45 years. I make observations. I study photos. I offer opinions. That is all I do. I owe nothing else to anyone. Take it or leave it. It matters not to me. I have done my best. I have no obligation to respond to various egocentric DEMANDS. The BURDEN OF PROOF in the JFK case was on the government. They failed. Lyndon Johnson and various elements of government killed the president. Believe that or not, just don't say that I have a BURDEN OF PROOF to prove it. I am not a prosecutor. I just look at photos and other evidence and tell what I see. I have NO burden to prove anything. I seek the truth...and often discover it. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter McGuire Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 People keep telling me I have a BURDEN OF PROOF to provide such and such or do so and so.False. I have NO burden of proof to do or provide ANYTHING! To anyone! Period. I have studied the evidence for 45 years. I make observations. I study photos. I offer opinions. That is all I do. I owe nothing else to anyone. Take it or leave it. It matters not to me. I have done my best. I have no obligation to respond to various egocentric DEMANDS. The BURDEN OF PROOF in the JFK case was on the government. They failed. Lyndon Johnson and various elements of government killed the president. Believe that or not, just don't say that I have a BURDEN OF PROOF to prove it. I am not a prosecutor. I just look at photos and other evidence and tell what I see. I have NO burden to prove anything. I seek the truth...and often discover it. Jack Well put. Apologists have it backwards. We do not need to prove a thing. The fact is the official version has not been proven to me and it never will. In fact, the official version has been disproven countless times. And they still march on. The only thing that I do not know is "why". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Baker Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 (edited) I seek the truth...and often discover it.Jack I'd be interested to see some examples of this, Jack. I was reading the endnotes of Bugliosi's book last night, your name crops up quite a few times. Paul. Edited January 22, 2010 by Paul Baker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I seek the truth...and often discover it.Jack I'd be interested to see some examples of this, Jack. I was reading the endnotes of Bugliosi's book last night, have you seen #505 (page 348)? Paul. No Paul, what does it show? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Baker Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 No Paul, what does it show? I edited my post after I found more examples of Jack's dodgy studies in the endnotes. But that specific instance covers one of Jack's "studies", in which he states that the crowd on the north curb of Elm Street don't move in the Zapruder film, i.e. they're not real! Watching a stabilized version of the film clearly shows them moving and clapping. I wonder if Jack has admitted that he was wrong in that instance ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now