The Goon Squad

[Len Colby]

Jack is constantly under attack, even was attacked physically and almost died, is in his late 80's and people like you like to 'beat-up' on him...says more about you than anything about him.

1 - Jack makes far more personal attacks than he receives

2 - He and his supporters conflate questioning his "studies" with personal attacks

3- There is no evidence the stabbing was related to his "research"

4- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Edited February 7, 2010 by Peter Lemkin

[Craig Lamson]

4- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

That was a very nasty ad hom I deleted. Let's not see that again. You have no respect, IMO, for anyone; no civility in your quest to prove the government [especially the USA one] is always correct, always honest; all events that seem suspicious are coincidences and we should all be good sheeple on our knees [as, IMO, you already are self-declared], rather than stand on our feet and think for ourselves; analyze for ourselves, fight for truth and democracy, constitution order, peace, justice and human decency and against evil, lies, deceptions, propaganda, control by the few over the many, a Permanent Warfare State and other horrors.

Please Len, post it again, or at least send it to me. I'm creating a "Lemkin Log" to see exactly what he decides to censor compared to what he actually posts...

[Paul Baker]

Peter, you do seem to be very selective in your moderation.

Jack's work xxxxx. Truths really can be that simple.

Edited February 8, 2010 by Peter Lemkin

[Jack White]

In the same spirit of pontification displayed by some, I am now granting special pontifical dispensation

to some who seem to have severe psychological or emotional problems. I too can pontificate.

[Len Colby]

Jack is constantly under attack, even was attacked physically and almost died, is in his late 80's and people like you like to 'beat-up' on him...says more about you than anything about him.

1 - Jack makes far more personal attacks than he receives

You seem unable to discern reaction from action - response to attack [very often yours] from initial attack. Or, maybe you can, but just pretend you can not.

Please point to where I have initiated a personal attack on Jack,I can point to numerous examples of you and him initiating such a attacks.

2 - He and his supporters conflate questioning his "studies" with personal attacks

3- There is no evidence the stabbing was related to his "research"

I can think of now way of wording a response that would not involve obscenities hurled at you for that. Callous. Insensitive. Inhuman....and wrong - accept to a Coincidence Theorist extraordiaire.

That's because you're a lunatic,Jack has never cited any evidence indicating it was an attempted hit.The fact that a the attacker was naked and didn't even wear a mask or gloves, and was unable to kill a sleeping man in his 60's suggests otherwise

4- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

That was a very nasty ad hom I deleted. Let's not see that again. You have no respect, IMO, for anyone; no civility in your quest to prove the government [especially the USA one] is always correct, always honest; all events that seem suspicious are coincidences and we should all be good sheeple on our knees [as, IMO, you already are self-declared], rather than stand on our feet and think for ourselves; analyze for ourselves, fight for truth and democracy, constitution order, peace, justice and human decency and against evil, lies, deceptions, propaganda, control by the few over the many, a Permanent Warfare State and other horrors.

This yet another of you acting arbitrarily you can't use Jack's advanced age as a reason people shouldn't challenge his claims and simultaneously object to people suggesting it could explain his numerous blunders.