Martin Hinrichs Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 I've read sections. And I simply don't deal in SPECULATION. Did you read that sections posted by Bill Kelly or did you own the book, Craig? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 I've read sections. And I simply don't deal in SPECULATION. Did you read that sections posted by Bill Kelly or did you own the book, Craig? Does matter where or how I read it Martin? The words have a different meaning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barb Junkkarinen Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 Ahhhh, thanks for clarifying, Jack. Soooo ... it's just a case of, ... Jamieson was pressured, this I know, 'cause Horne IV tells me so ... etc. So that's all you've got. Same on the side A side B of the film, same on Zavada, same on all the claims about what you call the Hollywood 7 and the black patch on 317. Why the way you and Fetzer were making claims and talking it up, and being that, as you guys noted, you are "insiders" and all, one would have thought you actually had something yourselves. So, thanks for clearing that up. Barb :-) little frightening when you step outside the confines of the Warren Commission Report and that lone nut cocoon called .johnville isn't it Barb? Oh yeah, I just project trembling in my boots fear, now don't I!? ROTFL And how are you .... now that it's come out that one Horne calls your "research associate" filmed and demonstrated the full flush left a few YEARS ago .... and yet you never said a word about that thru all the gnashing of teeth (including your own) on that subject here? Can it really be that your "research associate" did this without you ever knowing or hearing about it? How did that work, exactly? Do tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Hinrichs Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 I've read sections. And I simply don't deal in SPECULATION. Did you read that sections posted by Bill Kelly or did you own the book, Craig? Does matter where or how I read it Martin? The words have a different meaning? No it doesn't Craig. I just wanted to know if you own the book. You don't. I recommend to do so. Something new may face your mind. Martin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 (edited) No it doesn't Craig.I just wanted to know if you own the book. You don't. I recommend to do so. Something new may face your mind. Martin I was quite clear early on I would not purchase the book, did you miss that? Why in the world would I want to own such blatant misinformation and speculation Edited January 24, 2010 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karl Kinaski Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 (edited) Lamson: I was quite clear early on I would not purchase the book, did you miss that?Why in the world would I want to own such blatant misinformation and speculation Sounds like a whistling in the dark... KK Edited January 24, 2010 by Karl Kinaski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 Sounds like a whistling in the dark...KK KK Full flush left, gone. Sign edge problems, gone. Black patch, gone. Zavada, pure speculation. Hawkeye "works" ROFLMAO! Yea, whistling in the dark...DOUG HORNE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 Ahhhh, thanks for clarifying, Jack. Soooo ... it's just a case of, ... Jamieson was pressured, this I know, 'cause Horne IV tells me so ... etc. So that's all you've got. Same on the side A side B of the film, same on Zavada, same on all the claims about what you call the Hollywood 7 and the black patch on 317. Why the way you and Fetzer were making claims and talking it up, and being that, as you guys noted, you are "insiders" and all, one would have thought you actually had something yourselves. So, thanks for clearing that up. Barb :-) little frightening when you step outside the confines of the Warren Commission Report and that lone nut cocoon called .johnville isn't it Barb? Oh yeah, I just project trembling in my boots fear, now don't I!? ROTFL And how are you .... now that it's come out that one Horne calls your "research associate" filmed and demonstrated the full flush left a few YEARS ago .... and yet you never said a word about that thru all the gnashing of teeth (including your own) on that subject here? Can it really be that your "research associate" did this without you ever knowing or hearing about it? How did that work, exactly? Do tell. like I said Barb... little frightening when you step outside the confines of the Warren Commission Report and that lone nut cocoon called .johnville isn't it Barb? we've been hip to the xxxxx game for years now..... gnashing of teeth, at our age Bab's that's what false teeth are for.... now, the above quote if you please or has the cat got your tongue?and please don't sic Jer Logan or Lampoon Lamson on me, can't stand much more lone nut-xxxxx humor today... ROTFLMFAO You ever shoot a roll of 8mm film Barb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 (edited) Ahhhh, thanks for clarifying, Jack. Soooo ... it's just a case of, ... Jamieson was pressured, this I know, 'cause Horne IV tells me so ... etc. So that's all you've got. Same on the side A side B of the film, same on Zavada, same on all the claims about what you call the Hollywood 7 and the black patch on 317. Why the way you and Fetzer were making claims and talking it up, and being that, as you guys noted, you are "insiders" and all, one would have thought you actually had something yourselves. So, thanks for clearing that up. Barb :-) little frightening when you step outside the confines of the Warren Commission Report and that lone nut cocoon called .johnville isn't it Barb? Oh yeah, I just project trembling in my boots fear, now don't I!? ROTFL And how are you .... now that it's come out that one Horne calls your "research associate" filmed and demonstrated the full flush left a few YEARS ago .... and yet you never said a word about that thru all the gnashing of teeth (including your own) on that subject here? Can it really be that your "research associate" did this without you ever knowing or hearing about it? How did that work, exactly? Do tell. like I said Barb... little frightening when you step outside the confines of the Warren Commission Report and that lone nut cocoon called .johnville isn't it? we've been hip to that xxxxx game for years now..... gnashing of teeth, at our age Bab's that's what false teeth are for.... now, the above quote if you please or has the cat got your tongue? and please, don't sic Jer Logan or Lampoon Lamson on me, can't stand much more lone nut-xxxxx humor today... ROTFLMFAO You ever shoot a roll of 8mm film Barb? Edited January 25, 2010 by David G. Healy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barb Junkkarinen Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 Ahhhh, thanks for clarifying, Jack. Soooo ... it's just a case of, ... Jamieson was pressured, this I know, 'cause Horne IV tells me so ... etc. So that's all you've got. Same on the side A side B of the film, same on Zavada, same on all the claims about what you call the Hollywood 7 and the black patch on 317. Why the way you and Fetzer were making claims and talking it up, and being that, as you guys noted, you are "insiders" and all, one would have thought you actually had something yourselves. So, thanks for clearing that up. Barb :-) little frightening when you step outside the confines of the Warren Commission Report and that lone nut cocoon called .johnville isn't it Barb? Oh yeah, I just project trembling in my boots fear, now don't I!? ROTFL And how are you .... now that it's come out that one Horne calls your "research associate" filmed and demonstrated the full flush left a few YEARS ago .... and yet you never said a word about that thru all the gnashing of teeth (including your own) on that subject here? Can it really be that your "research associate" did this without you ever knowing or hearing about it? How did that work, exactly? Do tell. like I said Barb... little frightening when you step outside the confines of the Warren Commission Report and that lone nut cocoon called .johnville isn't it Barb? we've been hip to the xxxxx game for years now..... gnashing of teeth, at our age Bab's that's what false teeth are for.... now, the above quote if you please or has the cat got your tongue?and please don't sic Jer Logan or Lampoon Lamson on me, can't stand much more lone nut-xxxxx humor today... ROTFLMFAO Don't know what you mean by "the above quote if you please" .... and no cat ever has my tongue. You'll have to deal with your own straw and drivel as straw makes me sneeze and drivel, well ....ewwww. Rather lame dive, dodge & divert attempt too. Say, why not talk about the evidence and issues in the case? Like Jack said just last week ... "Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.ph...15301&st=30 I think he has something there. :-) Tell us about the film your "research associate" made years ago that showed y'all have been in error about the full flush left thing all along. Cat had your tongue all these years? You ever shoot a roll of 8mm film Barb? Naw, I just use paper targets when I take my carcano out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now