The case of the missing man in black...

[John Dolva]

Now, now Todd, don't be too logical. It's the penguins that were used to conceal the remote cameras that have been erased, not only from the photos and films but from the minds of spectators using a cocktail of earl gray tea and way too much sugar while wearing antennas with supercharged widgets. Those who dispute that are the enemy.

[Todd W. Vaughan]

Now, now Todd, don't be too logical. It's the penguins that were used to conceal the remote cameras that have been erased, not only from the photos and films but from the minds of spectators using a cocktail of earl gray tea and way too much sugar while wearing antennas with supercharged widgets. Those who dispute that are the enemy.

What they should have done was to have fabricated tripods that looked and were dressed exactly like each of the photogaphers, Bell, Altgens, Nix, Muchmore, etc.

That would have really fooled us all.

[Jack White]

Now, now Todd, don't be too logical. It's the penguins that were used to conceal the remote cameras that have been erased, not only from the photos and films but from the minds of spectators using a cocktail of earl gray tea and way too much sugar while wearing antennas with supercharged widgets. Those who dispute that are the enemy.

Jack is using logic that would make Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Professor Richard Pipes proud.

Because we can't see these things is the ultimate proof that they are there.

Richard Pipes during his "Team B" tenure (1975/76 Soviet threat analysis to counter CIA claims of a crumbling Soviet Union) he espoused "If something is not there it is significant by its absence."

Robotic Remote Cameras are complete fantasy and I know the term neo-con has been bandied around here of late - I'm sorry but this kind of Dealey Plaza fantasy/myth creation is straight of the Leo Strauss Chicago School of Philosophy and Politics.

Jack seems to think that the person with the most vivid imagination becomes the most powerful.

Poor Lee.

[John Dolva]

I reckon they probably did, or rather will (when the time travel machine is unveiled, or have they already?). I'm beginning to doubt DP has ever existed. I'm way ahead of you, they already have (or will) fool us. I'm going to have to get my tin hat out (just in case). I've already forgotten what the point was that I was trying to make.

[Todd W. Vaughan]

Now, now Todd, don't be too logical. It's the penguins that were used to conceal the remote cameras that have been erased, not only from the photos and films but from the minds of spectators using a cocktail of earl gray tea and way too much sugar while wearing antennas with supercharged widgets. Those who dispute that are the enemy.

Jack is using logic that would make Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Professor Richard Pipes proud.

Because we can't see these things is the ultimate proof that they are there.

Richard Pipes during his "Team B" tenure (1975/76 Soviet threat analysis to counter CIA claims of a crumbling Soviet Union) he espoused "If something is not there it is significant by its absence."

Robotic Remote Cameras are complete fantasy and I know the term neo-con has been bandied around here of late - I'm sorry but this kind of Dealey Plaza fantasy/myth creation is straight of the Leo Strauss Chicago School of Philosophy and Politics.

Jack seems to think that the person with the most vivid imagination becomes the most powerful.

Poor Lee.

So which is it, Jack, were the tripods seen in photos or were they hidden or disguised?

[Jack White]

Dealey Plaza was a SCENARIO put together by Lansdale and Conein.

Prouty told me that Dealey Plaza had a written scenario done well in

advance with all sorts of false leads, patsies, redundancies, AND PHOTO

COVERAGE. You better believe that they controlled all photography.

[Todd W. Vaughan]

Dealey Plaza was a SCENARIO put together by Lansdale and Conein.

Prouty told me that Dealey Plaza had a written scenario done well in

advance with all sorts of false leads, patsies, redundancies, AND PHOTO

COVERAGE. You better believe that they controlled all photography.

So which is it, Jack, were the tripods seen in photos or were they hidden or disguised?

[John Dugan]

Tripods and remote cameras has to the most ridiculous thing I have ever read on this forum.

Jack, you have some great ideas and have done some informative studies, but you sound insignificant when you conjure up these wild ideas as to how things went down on 11.22.63., with no proof or evidence of such. Some of these theories would be better suited for a science fiction novel.

[Jack White]

Tripods and remote cameras has to the most ridiculous thing I have ever read on this forum.

Jack, you have some great ideas and have done some informative studies, but you sound insignificant when you conjure up these wild ideas as to how things went down on 11.22.63., with no proof or evidence of such. Some of these theories would be better suited for a science fiction novel.

Remote cameras are widely used by the military. Check it out.

Here is just one site:

http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~jeff/115a/remote...inghistory.html

There are hundreds.

Edited February 24, 2010 by Jack White

[Todd W. Vaughan]

Tripods and remote cameras has to the most ridiculous thing I have ever read on this forum.

Jack, you have some great ideas and have done some informative studies, but you sound insignificant when you conjure up these wild ideas as to how things went down on 11.22.63., with no proof or evidence of such. Some of these theories would be better suited for a science fiction novel.

Remote cameras are widely used by the military. Check it out.

Here is just one site:

http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~jeff/115a/remote...inghistory.html

There are hundreds.

Jack,

In the link to the “Chronological History of Aerial Photography and Remote Sensing” chronology you posted the following entry is missing for some reason (I THINK YOU KNOW WHY!);

QUOTE ON

1963 – Military Intelligence uses tripod mounted and remotely controlled cameras to film the events on Houston Street in Dallas’s Dealey Plaza seconds before President Kennedy is assassinated so that all films and photos taken before the actual assassination can be altered. Most of the tripods and cameras are hidden, but in a major blunder, some of the tripods and cameras are left out in the open. As a result, Military Intelligence operatives are forced to get the FBI to try and confiscate every film and photo taken by spectators so they can be altered with big obvious patches of paint brushed on blue-gray to hide the tripods. Some things escape alteration, such as the man carrying a bowling ball with a third arm, a man carrying a toy dog, and a man in black with a missing leg – no, wait, the man in black actually had the correct number of legs. Forget about that one.

QUOTE OFF

Todd

[Jack White]

Tripods and remote cameras has to the most ridiculous thing I have ever read on this forum.

Jack, you have some great ideas and have done some informative studies, but you sound insignificant when you conjure up these wild ideas as to how things went down on 11.22.63., with no proof or evidence of such. Some of these theories would be better suited for a science fiction novel.

Remote cameras are widely used by the military. Check it out.

Here is just one site:

http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~jeff/115a/remote...inghistory.html

There are hundreds.

Jack,

In the link to the “Chronological History of Aerial Photography and Remote Sensing” chronology you posted the following entry is missing for some reason (I THINK YOU KNOW WHY!);

QUOTE ON

1963 – Military Intelligence uses tripod mounted and remotely controlled cameras to film the events on Houston Street in Dallas’s Dealey Plaza seconds before President Kennedy is assassinated so that all films and photos taken before the actual assassination can be altered. Most of the tripods and cameras are hidden, but in a major blunder, some of the tripods and cameras are left out in the open. As a result, Military Intelligence operatives are forced to get the FBI to try and confiscate every film and photo taken by spectators so they can be altered with big obvious patches of paint brushed on blue-gray to hide the tripods. Some things escape alteration, such as the man carrying a bowling ball with a third arm, a man carrying a toy dog, and a man in black with a missing leg – no, wait, the man in black actually had the correct number of legs. Forget about that one.

QUOTE OFF

Todd

Glad to see you have been paying attention.

[Todd W. Vaughan]

Tripods and remote cameras has to the most ridiculous thing I have ever read on this forum.

Jack, you have some great ideas and have done some informative studies, but you sound insignificant when you conjure up these wild ideas as to how things went down on 11.22.63., with no proof or evidence of such. Some of these theories would be better suited for a science fiction novel.

Remote cameras are widely used by the military. Check it out.

Here is just one site:

http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~jeff/115a/remote...inghistory.html

There are hundreds.

Jack,

In the link to the “Chronological History of Aerial Photography and Remote Sensing” chronology you posted the following entry is missing for some reason (I THINK YOU KNOW WHY!);

QUOTE ON

1963 – Military Intelligence uses tripod mounted and remotely controlled cameras to film the events on Houston Street in Dallas’s Dealey Plaza seconds before President Kennedy is assassinated so that all films and photos taken before the actual assassination can be altered. Most of the tripods and cameras are hidden, but in a major blunder, some of the tripods and cameras are left out in the open. As a result, Military Intelligence operatives are forced to get the FBI to try and confiscate every film and photo taken by spectators so they can be altered with big obvious patches of paint brushed on blue-gray to hide the tripods. Some things escape alteration, such as the man carrying a bowling ball with a third arm, a man carrying a toy dog, and a man in black with a missing leg – no, wait, the man in black actually had the correct number of legs. Forget about that one.

QUOTE OFF

Todd

Glad to see you have been paying attention.

Oh, I'm paying attention alright, Jack, to a ridiculous display of buffoonery. You can't make this kind of nonsense up - it's priceless.

Edited February 24, 2010 by Todd W. Vaughan

[Jack White]

Tripods and remote cameras has to the most ridiculous thing I have ever read on this forum.

Jack, you have some great ideas and have done some informative studies, but you sound insignificant when you conjure up these wild ideas as to how things went down on 11.22.63., with no proof or evidence of such. Some of these theories would be better suited for a science fiction novel.

Remote cameras are widely used by the military. Check it out.

Here is just one site:

http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~jeff/115a/remote...inghistory.html

There are hundreds.

Jack,

In the link to the “Chronological History of Aerial Photography and Remote Sensing” chronology you posted the following entry is missing for some reason (I THINK YOU KNOW WHY!);

QUOTE ON

1963 – Military Intelligence uses tripod mounted and remotely controlled cameras to film the events on Houston Street in Dallas’s Dealey Plaza seconds before President Kennedy is assassinated so that all films and photos taken before the actual assassination can be altered. Most of the tripods and cameras are hidden, but in a major blunder, some of the tripods and cameras are left out in the open. As a result, Military Intelligence operatives are forced to get the FBI to try and confiscate every film and photo taken by spectators so they can be altered with big obvious patches of paint brushed on blue-gray to hide the tripods. Some things escape alteration, such as the man carrying a bowling ball with a third arm, a man carrying a toy dog, and a man in black with a missing leg – no, wait, the man in black actually had the correct number of legs. Forget about that one.

QUOTE OFF

Todd

Glad to see you have been paying attention.

Oh, I'm paying attention alright, Jack, to a ridiculous display of buffoonery. You can't make this kind of nonsense up - it's priceless.

LONENUTTERS are the real buffoons.

[Todd W. Vaughan]

Tripods and remote cameras has to the most ridiculous thing I have ever read on this forum.

Jack, you have some great ideas and have done some informative studies, but you sound insignificant when you conjure up these wild ideas as to how things went down on 11.22.63., with no proof or evidence of such. Some of these theories would be better suited for a science fiction novel.

Remote cameras are widely used by the military. Check it out.

Here is just one site:

http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~jeff/115a/remote...inghistory.html

There are hundreds.

Jack,

In the link to the “Chronological History of Aerial Photography and Remote Sensing” chronology you posted the following entry is missing for some reason (I THINK YOU KNOW WHY!);

QUOTE ON

1963 – Military Intelligence uses tripod mounted and remotely controlled cameras to film the events on Houston Street in Dallas’s Dealey Plaza seconds before President Kennedy is assassinated so that all films and photos taken before the actual assassination can be altered. Most of the tripods and cameras are hidden, but in a major blunder, some of the tripods and cameras are left out in the open. As a result, Military Intelligence operatives are forced to get the FBI to try and confiscate every film and photo taken by spectators so they can be altered with big obvious patches of paint brushed on blue-gray to hide the tripods. Some things escape alteration, such as the man carrying a bowling ball with a third arm, a man carrying a toy dog, and a man in black with a missing leg – no, wait, the man in black actually had the correct number of legs. Forget about that one.

QUOTE OFF

Todd

Glad to see you have been paying attention.

Oh, I'm paying attention alright, Jack, to a ridiculous display of buffoonery. You can't make this kind of nonsense up - it's priceless.

LONENUTTERS are the real buffoons.

NOW who's the bigot?

[Jack White]

Tripods and remote cameras has to the most ridiculous thing I have ever read on this forum.

Jack, you have some great ideas and have done some informative studies, but you sound insignificant when you conjure up these wild ideas as to how things went down on 11.22.63., with no proof or evidence of such. Some of these theories would be better suited for a science fiction novel.

Remote cameras are widely used by the military. Check it out.

Here is just one site:

http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~jeff/115a/remote...inghistory.html

There are hundreds.

Jack,

In the link to the “Chronological History of Aerial Photography and Remote Sensing” chronology you posted the following entry is missing for some reason (I THINK YOU KNOW WHY!);

QUOTE ON

1963 – Military Intelligence uses tripod mounted and remotely controlled cameras to film the events on Houston Street in Dallas’s Dealey Plaza seconds before President Kennedy is assassinated so that all films and photos taken before the actual assassination can be altered. Most of the tripods and cameras are hidden, but in a major blunder, some of the tripods and cameras are left out in the open. As a result, Military Intelligence operatives are forced to get the FBI to try and confiscate every film and photo taken by spectators so they can be altered with big obvious patches of paint brushed on blue-gray to hide the tripods. Some things escape alteration, such as the man carrying a bowling ball with a third arm, a man carrying a toy dog, and a man in black with a missing leg – no, wait, the man in black actually had the correct number of legs. Forget about that one.

QUOTE OFF

Todd

Glad to see you have been paying attention.

Oh, I'm paying attention alright, Jack, to a ridiculous display of buffoonery. You can't make this kind of nonsense up - it's priceless.

LONENUTTERS are the real buffoons.

NOW who's the bigot?

LONENUTTERS? Hmmmmmmm. I probably do have a prejudice against lonenutters. Is that bad?