Victory! For The Democrat Who Wants Obama Impeached

[Terry Mauro]

Terry thanks for posting that article which backs most of what I’ve been saying and undermines your claim most of her voters knew what her positions were. It indicated other reasons she might have one including being the 1st candidate listed and the overlapping Texas House race being between two African Americans.

The fact that Rodgers won a primary with extremely low turnout in an open primary state for a seat her party had no chance of winning proves nothing. Nor is the possibility that a candidate with zero chance of winning the final election got cross over votes during a primary analogous to party nominees getting cross over votes in competitive races on Election Day. Nor is there much evidence JFK, who barely won with less than 50% of the vote against one of the least charismatic men to run for president, had support from Republicans. The popular vote in 1960 was similar to that in 1948 and 1968 The larger margins of victory in 1952, 1956 and 1964 probably had more to do with the candidates personas than politics. The US’s dramatic near overnight drop from one of its greatest economic booms to its worst ever depression obviously was the major factor in the dramatic shift in party allegiance between 1928 and 1932.

You continue to show that you are incapable of independent thought and merely parrot your guru and his disciples

Kesha Rogers was all over her district with campaign material and a 18 foot banner that read "Impeach Obama and save NASA". She was the only Democrat campaiging in her district. Everyone knew she was was calling for the impeachment of President Obama and saving NASA. There was no doubt about what she was doing.

Most of the coverage of her victory included her call to impeach Obama.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz...q=&gs_rfai=

As far as being a parrot you do a pretty good job yourself. Nothing you just wrote hasn't already been offered as an excuse from those shocked by the election results. Like loser Doug Blatt, who lost to Kesha Rogers because he and his party supporters offered nothing to the voters. He told Dem's that Kesha wasnt a real Democrat and that she wanted to impeach the President. So even Kesha's opponent was spreading the news.

Your analysis is typically wrong. From our argument on derivatives (which blew up in 2007), to Kennedy's space program, to Obama's popularity, you're always wrong.

Do you know why you're always wrong? It's your method, which is nothing more than sophistry.

[Terry Mauro]

FDR 1st ran (and won) as a Democrat in 1910, JFK did so in 1946, neither was ever associated with another party or a fringe political movement, the latter's family has been associated with the party since before he was born. Show us any evidence Rodgers had any prior involvement with the Party. She is part of a political movement that the party has always made an effort to disassociate itself with.

Len, FDR and JFK are not Democrats for the same reason Phillip Morris, (Altria} isn't an American Company, because Lyndon says they aint.

Stephen,

It seems you have trouble discriminating between a republic and an Empire.

From EIR 2007

The islands of the Caribbean have long played a key role in the British Empire's assault against the United States. The Brits set up the offshore banking centers in the Caribbean to pave the way for the explosion of narcotics out of Ibero-America, then used the proceeds from the dope trade to take over the U.S. financial system. The result of this cultural, political, and financial warfare by the Brits and their pirates of the Caribbean is the creation of the largest financial bubble in world history, a giant casino which is now collapsing.

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2007/3437...9;s_island.html

No Terry, I have no such trouble. You on the other hand seem to think that using Larouche to butress an earlier Larouche quote constitutes evidence, it doesn't, it just represents further ramblings from a, frankly, unhinged mind. its a bit like asking Hitler who was responsible for WW2. Although I imagine in the Larouche walled garden that would be Britain.

Stephen , are you disputing the claim that 90% of the hedge funds are incorporated in the Cayman Islands?

Are you suggesting that the Queen could not regulate of eliminate these dirty financial networks if she so wished?

You brought up the hedge fund issue but when you are confronted with their real ownership you default to a meaningless ad hom attack.

If you have proof that this isnt true then by all means I would like to see it.

[Guest Stephen Turner]

Why have Terry's last two posts been set to invisible? If I dont get a reason I shall reset them.

[Terry Mauro]

WESTERN EUROPE

BBC STIRRED UP BY KESHA ROGERS CAMPAIGN

March 17, 2010 (LPAC) -- The BBC has once again registered the

British financial empire's fear of economist Lyndon LaRouche and

his "four powers" policy to end monetarism and establish a credit

system of sovereign nations. BBC's is prominent among a number of

British tantrums since LaRouche associate Kesha Rogers'

stunning victory in the 22nd Congressional District Democratic

primary in Texas, running on LaRouche's policy including the

impeachment of London-run President Barack Obama.

In his editor's blog, the BBC'S America Editor Mark Mardell

wrote last night: "Why is a Democratic candidate in Texas calling

for the impeachment of the president? It is one of the odder

results thrown up by the US system of primary elections, with

registered voters choosing who gets to represent their favoured

party.

"Kesha Rogers, who won the Democratic nomination for Texas's

22nd Congressional district with 52% of the vote, has been

quickly disowned by the by Texas Democrats. She is a supporter of

the LaRouche Youth Movement.

"They are the ones who stand on the fringes of Tea Party

rallies carrying placards depicting Obama as Hitler. It is not a

casual insult: they believe that Obama's healthcare proposals are

based on Hitler's and their aim is a eugenic cull of the

population, and that the president should be thrown out of

office. The movement founded by Lyndon LaRouche, who's stood for

president many times, is sometimes described as far-right. I am

not sure that does justice to its rather eclectic mixture of

policies.

"Followers believe that the White House takes orders from

the British Empire (run from Buckingham Palace and Threadneedle

Street), which also organised two World Wars and the fall of the

USSR, and they are passionate about expansion into space,

particularly the colonisation of Mars using the power of nuclear

fusion.

"Now they are campaigning for some potentially more popular

policies, such as ending bank bail-outs, big job creation

programmes, and strict new financial regulations. But the reason

their programme isn't being hailed more widely is apparently

because America's youth has been enslaved by Rupert Murdoch and

Bill Gates using (respectively) MySpace and Facebook.The

Republican candidate for Texas's 22nd district, Pete Olson,

should have an interesting election."

[indeed...ed.] (rap)