Mark Lane

[Peter McGuire]

What would Warren have had to do to arouse your suspicions that he was no innocent, pressured by power?

There is a convincing story that he was pressured into putting his name on the report but this is something to consider. But what difference would it make?

[Karl Kinaski]

What would Warren have had to do to arouse your suspicions that he was no innocent, pressured by power?

There is a convincing story that he was pressured into putting his name on the report but this is something to consider. But what difference would it make?

There was a Impeach Warren movement, initiated by Gerald Ford prior to the assassination. After Warren accepted to be a member of the Commission, that movement disappeared from earth. (Ruby had something to do with Impeach Warren placards, hours before he shot Oswald.)

Edited April 2, 2010 by Karl Kinaski

[Peter McGuire]

THE FACTS

"Warren was a true believer, he suppressed the essential truth for the worst of all reasons, and through the best of all motives; he alone knew what was right for us. It is difficult, even in retrospect, to know which is more pathetic, his belief that the American people could not be trusted with the truth or his reliance for the truth upon the CIA.

Even if everything Warren had been told by the CIA was true, his response, endorsed by President Johnson, explained by Eisenberg, and apologized away by Wirin, was unsupportable in a democratic society. Warren's primary sin, however, was not venality. It was monumental, mind numbing stupidity." ( my emphasis )

Page 54 THE FACTS Plausible Denial Mark Lane

Edited April 10, 2010 by Peter McGuire