Two Lee Harvey Oswalds, two Marguerites

[Jack White]

So that even the strangest among this group can understand:

The CIA had a SECRET operation, a false defector program.

The ORIGINAL Marguerite Oswald volunteered to lend the

IDENTITY of her son LEE HARVEY OSWALD to the government.

To do this, she took LEE HARVEY OSWALD to New York.

There they met two strangers who were to assume their identities.

This was SECRET.

These were a SECOND Marguerite and a SECOND Lee Harvey

Oswald. From that point onward, the two sets of Oswald

mothers and sons LIVED PARALLEL LIVES, creating parallel

records WHICH CONFLICTED...but were very similar.

This was done IN SECRET. Each Marguerite used the name

Marguerite. Each son used the name LEE HARVEY OSWALD.

They were NOT, as some strangely imply, called HARVEY

and LEE. Both boys were called LEE HARVEY OSWALD.

Each group knew and knew of the other group. Probably

close family members were in on the secret, such as John

Pic and Robert Oswald...for they surely knew that one

Marguerite was not their mother and that one Lee Harvey

Oswald was not their brother.

Each group (son and mother) made sure to leave records

in Fort Worth and New Orleans...such as school records and

employment records THAT WERE SIMILAR. It was all a

program of building a LEGEND for the two pairs that was

similar.

John Armstrong CLEARLY PROVES THE ABOVE to any

person of intelligence.

Jack

[William Kelly]

So that even the strangest among this group can understand:

The CIA had a SECRET operation, a false defector program.

The ORIGINAL Marguerite Oswald volunteered to lend the

IDENTITY of her son LEE HARVEY OSWALD to the government.

To do this, she took LEE HARVEY OSWALD to New York.

There they met two strangers who were to assume their identities.

This was SECRET.

These were a SECOND Marguerite and a SECOND Lee Harvey

Oswald. From that point onward, the two sets of Oswald

mothers and sons LIVED PARALLEL LIVES, creating parallel

records WHICH CONFLICTED...but were very similar.

This was done IN SECRET. Each Marguerite used the name

Marguerite. Each son used the name LEE HARVEY OSWALD.

They were NOT, as some strangely imply, called HARVEY

and LEE. Both boys were called LEE HARVEY OSWALD.

Each group knew and knew of the other group. Probably

close family members were in on the secret, such as John

Pic and Robert Oswald...for they surely knew that one

Marguerite was not their mother and that one Lee Harvey

Oswald was not their brother.

Each group (son and mother) made sure to leave records

in Fort Worth and New Orleans...such as school records and

employment records THAT WERE SIMILAR. It was all a

program of building a LEGEND for the two pairs that was

similar.

John Armstrong CLEARLY PROVES THE ABOVE to any

person of intelligence.

Jack

That's good Jack. Keep things basic so they're easy to understand.

You know, if we ever get a grand jury, either in DC or Dallas, studies indicate that the grand jury pools in those cities are composed primarily of women minorities with little formal education, so whatever evidence would be presented to them would have to be simplified and made understandable to ordinary persons. It's got to be even simpiler for me to understand.

When it comes to John Armstrong's work, you can be sure it will be backed up by solid documentation and often complimented by his first hand interviews with witnesses, double barrell dynamite.

In approaching his hypothesis of two Oswalds however, I don't think you have to buy the whole religion but can learn something from what he presents and take some and leave some and design your own hypothesis, or let one evolve.

But approaching it the way he started out is important though, and I want to take us back a bit now - Sherman set the Wayback Machine to the back dining room at Campisi's Egyptian Lounge in Dallas, Texas, November something, at some early anniversary of JFK's assassination (They all blur together after awhile). We all sat at one long table, but you sat next to me and I sat across from John Armstron, so we could talk the whole dinner.

It had to be long before the book came out because Armstrong was explaining the idea behind it. He was impressed by the deep background established by some of the Soviet spys like Rudolph Able (exchanged for Gary Powers) and he named a few others, some of which were sleeper agents for many years before being activated.

I suggested that Trotsky's assassin Raymon Mercader was also a good example of a agent/assassin being set up, even as a child, with a cooperative mother, etc., and also the idea that our intelligence services automatically duplicated the operations of the opposition whenever they learned about them - ie. interrogation techniques, MKULTRA, PAPERCLIP, - were all developed because the Russians, Chinese and Koreans were doing it.

So why woudn't they also duplicate the concept of deep, sleeper penetration using families?

I'm sure the military, especially the USMC develops recruits from families like the Oswalds, fatherless, single dominant mom, with multible sons, recruiting the eldest and targeting the younger ones.

Who was that guy from Big Brothers?

Who was that USMC recruiter who tried to get Oswald to enlist before he was 17?

Did they realy move to NYC so Oswald could take some tests?

And as Posner quotes Dr. Herzog in Case Closed, Oswald tested "Passive-Aggressive" in the Personality test, exactly the type of person the Navy was looking for their special assassins unit, according to Dr. Lt. Commander Narut.

So we have this very plausible theory that Lee Harvey Oswald and his entire family were possibly subjects of a long term military study, and they and their identities were used operationaly by whoever ran this study.

And in the end, this same operation framed Lee Harvey Oswald for the assassination of President Kennedy.

Does figuring out how the framed the Patsy help us understand how they killed JFK, and who did it?

Armstrong has set the stage for people to understand the framing of Oswald and the various imposters used, and he can help take this a step further, if he wants to.

BK

[Jack White]

So that even the strangest among this group can understand:

The CIA had a SECRET operation, a false defector program.

The ORIGINAL Marguerite Oswald volunteered to lend the

IDENTITY of her son LEE HARVEY OSWALD to the government.

To do this, she took LEE HARVEY OSWALD to New York.

There they met two strangers who were to assume their identities.

This was SECRET.

These were a SECOND Marguerite and a SECOND Lee Harvey

Oswald. From that point onward, the two sets of Oswald

mothers and sons LIVED PARALLEL LIVES, creating parallel

records WHICH CONFLICTED...but were very similar.

This was done IN SECRET. Each Marguerite used the name

Marguerite. Each son used the name LEE HARVEY OSWALD.

They were NOT, as some strangely imply, called HARVEY

and LEE. Both boys were called LEE HARVEY OSWALD.

Each group knew and knew of the other group. Probably

close family members were in on the secret, such as John

Pic and Robert Oswald...for they surely knew that one

Marguerite was not their mother and that one Lee Harvey

Oswald was not their brother.

Each group (son and mother) made sure to leave records

in Fort Worth and New Orleans...such as school records and

employment records THAT WERE SIMILAR. It was all a

program of building a LEGEND for the two pairs that was

similar.

John Armstrong CLEARLY PROVES THE ABOVE to any

person of intelligence.

Jack

That's good Jack. Keep things basic so they're easy to understand.

You know, if we ever get a grand jury, either in DC or Dallas, studies indicate that the grand jury pools in those cities are composed primarily of women minorities with little formal education, so whatever evidence would be presented to them would have to be simplified and made understandable to ordinary persons. It's got to be even simpiler for me to understand.

When it comes to John Armstrong's work, you can be sure it will be backed up by solid documentation and often complimented by his first hand interviews with witnesses, double barrell dynamite.

In approaching his hypothesis of two Oswalds however, I don't think you have to buy the whole religion but can learn something from what he presents and take some and leave some and design your own hypothesis, or let one evolve.

But approaching it the way he started out is important though, and I want to take us back a bit now - Sherman set the Wayback Machine to the back dining room at Campisi's Egyptian Lounge in Dallas, Texas, November something, at some early anniversary of JFK's assassination (They all blur together after awhile). We all sat at one long table, but you sat next to me and I sat across from John Armstron, so we could talk the whole dinner.

It had to be long before the book came out because Armstrong was explaining the idea behind it. He was impressed by the deep background established by some of the Soviet spys like Rudolph Able (exchanged for Gary Powers) and he named a few others, some of which were sleeper agents for many years before being activated.

I suggested that Trotsky's assassin Raymon Mercader was also a good example of a agent/assassin being set up, even as a child, with a cooperative mother, etc., and also the idea that our intelligence services automatically duplicated the operations of the opposition whenever they learned about them - ie. interrogation techniques, MKULTRA, PAPERCLIP, - were all developed because the Russians, Chinese and Koreans were doing it.

So why woudn't they also duplicate the concept of deep, sleeper penetration using families?

I'm sure the military, especially the USMC develops recruits from families like the Oswalds, fatherless, single dominant mom, with multible sons, recruiting the eldest and targeting the younger ones.

Who was that guy from Big Brothers?

Who was that USMC recruiter who tried to get Oswald to enlist before he was 17?

Did they realy move to NYC so Oswald could take some tests?

And as Posner quotes Dr. Herzog in Case Closed, Oswald tested "Passive-Aggressive" in the Personality test, exactly the type of person the Navy was looking for their special assassins unit, according to Dr. Lt. Commander Narut.

So we have this very plausible theory that Lee Harvey Oswald and his entire family were possibly subjects of a long term military study, and they and their identities were used operationaly by whoever ran this study.

And in the end, this same operation framed Lee Harvey Oswald for the assassination of President Kennedy.

Does figuring out how the framed the Patsy help us understand how they killed JFK, and who did it?

Armstrong has set the stage for people to understand the framing of Oswald and the various imposters used, and he can help take this a step further, if he wants to.

BK

Thanks for the analysis, Bill. John has never claimed to have ALL the answers.

But he clearly proves the operation of the false defector program. Missing is

DOCUMENTATION OF THE LHO TIME IN RUSSIA. That is not a shortcoming of

Armstrong. It is just that such is NOT AVAILABLE. So the book obviously is

not 100 percent perfect. But it is the best that 12 years of private research

could do.

Jack