Bill Byas Posted September 4, 2004 Share Posted September 4, 2004 I notice there does not seem much ineterst in Judyth Baker. I am curious if people here do not believe her? Or just waiting for more evidence? Bill Byas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wim Dankbaar Posted September 5, 2004 Share Posted September 5, 2004 (edited) I notice there does not seem much ineterst in Judyth Baker. I am curious if people here do not believe her? Or just waiting for more evidence?Bill Byas <{POST_SNAPBACK}> To John Simkin, This guy is obviously not who he says he is, as has declined every opportunity to prove the opposite and post some biographical information, which I understand is now compulsory. He is possibly a goon for Bob Vernon, whose new and sudden mission is to suggest Judyth Baker is a hoax. Most of his questions are answered in the Judyth Baker thread, started by himself. He has now started another thread with the exact same subject, as if he wouldn't know any better. John, your new rules are excellent to keep this forum clean, objective and free from fake invaders with an hidden dishonest agenda. But not if you won't apply the rules. Advice: Kick him off ! Wim Edited September 5, 2004 by Wim Dankbaar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nancy Eldreth Posted September 13, 2004 Share Posted September 13, 2004 I notice there does not seem much ineterst in Judyth Baker. I am curious if people here do not believe her? Or just waiting for more evidence?Bill Byas <{POST_SNAPBACK}> To John Simkin, This guy is obviously not who he says he is, as has declined every opportunity to prove the opposite and post some biographical information, which I understand is now compulsory. He is possibly a goon for Bob Vernon, whose new and sudden mission is to suggest Judyth Baker is a hoax. Most of his questions are answered in the Judyth Baker thread, started by himself. He has now started another thread with the exact same subject, as if he wouldn't know any better. John, your new rules are excellent to keep this forum clean, objective and free from fake invaders with an hidden dishonest agenda. But not if you won't apply the rules. Advice: Kick him off ! Wim <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nancy Eldreth Posted September 13, 2004 Share Posted September 13, 2004 I notice there does not seem much ineterst in Judyth Baker. I am curious if people here do not believe her? Or just waiting for more evidence?Bill Byas <{POST_SNAPBACK}> To John Simkin, This guy is obviously not who he says he is, as has declined every opportunity to prove the opposite and post some biographical information, which I understand is now compulsory. He is possibly a goon for Bob Vernon, whose new and sudden mission is to suggest Judyth Baker is a hoax. Most of his questions are answered in the Judyth Baker thread, started by himself. He has now started another thread with the exact same subject, as if he wouldn't know any better. John, your new rules are excellent to keep this forum clean, objective and free from fake invaders with an hidden dishonest agenda. But not if you won't apply the rules. Advice: Kick him off ! Wim <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nancy Eldreth Posted September 13, 2004 Share Posted September 13, 2004 Wim I hope you don't say that about me>>>>>> Judyth is a very kind person. Silent and yet bold at the same time. Hard to be both but she is. I have been talking to her and glad to do that since last October just before they did the show where I first saw her on The Man Who Killed Kennedy. I wondered why she didn't show as much but a lot came out since then. She does have a lot of proof and I did help her get one set of papers she wanted for some time. From what I see when this does come out she will be well known and I do think many who did at one time disbelieve her will be believing her story much better. She asked me if I could try to get Lee H. Oswalds time cards. I told her I would try and not only did I get them but I also was questioned by an agent that is stationed at NARA. That was proof enough for me right there. No FBI agent is going to question a hoax. No he had reasons and I did see why. When her book does come out I am anxious to see just what she put in about that. From my own basis with knowing more about Lee H. Oswald through her I found many new things about him. I always since I was small thought that Oswald was a patsy and was used. He wan't only used he was very abused as well. I do look for more to come out about Oswald through Judyth in the near furure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Kelly Posted April 3, 2010 Share Posted April 3, 2010 I notice there does not seem much ineterst in Judyth Baker. I am curious if people here do not believe her? Or just waiting for more evidence?Bill Byas Gee Bill, I don't know if you'll be able to drum up an interest in Judyth Baker around here. Where have you been? It's like you walk into the saloon after the fight's over. BK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Burnham Posted April 3, 2010 Share Posted April 3, 2010 (edited) I notice there does not seem much ineterst in Judyth Baker. I am curious if people here do not believe her? Or just waiting for more evidence?Bill Byas You're obviously not serious. Notice the high number of both reads [38,000+] and replies [870+] in the existing thread below. Edited April 3, 2010 by Greg Burnham Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hogan Posted April 3, 2010 Share Posted April 3, 2010 I notice there does not seem much ineterst in Judyth Baker. I am curious if people here do not believe her? Or just waiting for more evidence?Bill Byas You're obviously not serious. Notice the high number of both reads [38,000+] and replies [870+] in the existing thread below. Greg, I think he was serious at the time he wrote it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dolva Posted April 3, 2010 Share Posted April 3, 2010 ''I notice there does not seem much ineterst in Judyth Baker. I am curious if people here do not believe her? Or just waiting for more evidence?'' Bill Byas ''You're obviously not serious. Notice the high number of both reads [38,000+] and replies [870+] in the existing thread below.'' List the number of posters. It's easy to make up to 5 hits in putting together a post and then set an autorefresh in action. It's not reads but hits. Subtract irrelevancies and there'd be a, I hypothesise, significantly lower number of actual posts/replies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted April 3, 2010 Share Posted April 3, 2010 But, of course, although Dolva does not mention it, the same argument could be made for every thread on the forum. If this is the longest in the history of the EF, then it is not difficult to answer the question: interest in her is quite considerable! ''I notice there does not seem much ineterst in Judyth Baker. I am curious if people here do not believe her? Or just waiting for more evidence?''Bill Byas ''You're obviously not serious. Notice the high number of both reads [38,000+] and replies [870+] in the existing thread below.'' List the number of posters. It's easy to make up to 5 hits in putting together a post and then set an autorefresh in action. It's not reads but hits. Subtract irrelevancies and there'd be a, I hypothesise, significantly lower number of actual posts/replies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Williams Posted April 3, 2010 Share Posted April 3, 2010 But, of course, although Dolva does not mention it, the same argument could bemade for every thread on the forum. If this is the longest in the history of the EF, then it is not difficult to answer the question: interest in her is quite considerable! ''I notice there does not seem much ineterst in Judyth Baker. I am curious if people here do not believe her? Or just waiting for more evidence?''Bill Byas ''You're obviously not serious. Notice the high number of both reads [38,000+] and replies [870+] in the existing thread below.'' List the number of posters. It's easy to make up to 5 hits in putting together a post and then set an autorefresh in action. It's not reads but hits. Subtract irrelevancies and there'd be a, I hypothesise, significantly lower number of actual posts/replies. I suspect many are viewing it as a Monty Pythonesk form of ridiculous humor. I know I am. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Kelly Posted April 3, 2010 Share Posted April 3, 2010 But, of course, although Dolva does not mention it, the same argument could bemade for every thread on the forum. If this is the longest in the history of the EF, then it is not difficult to answer the question: interest in her is quite considerable! ''I notice there does not seem much ineterst in Judyth Baker. I am curious if people here do not believe her? Or just waiting for more evidence?''Bill Byas ''You're obviously not serious. Notice the high number of both reads [38,000+] and replies [870+] in the existing thread below.'' List the number of posters. It's easy to make up to 5 hits in putting together a post and then set an autorefresh in action. It's not reads but hits. Subtract irrelevancies and there'd be a, I hypothesise, significantly lower number of actual posts/replies. I suspect many are viewing it as a Monty Pythonesk form of ridiculous humor. I know I am. Mike I too sometimes view Prof. Fetzer as the guy in Life of Brian? who keeps on taunting after having his arms and legs cut off. He doesn't take that as being defeated. BK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Williams Posted April 3, 2010 Share Posted April 3, 2010 But, of course, although Dolva does not mention it, the same argument could bemade for every thread on the forum. If this is the longest in the history of the EF, then it is not difficult to answer the question: interest in her is quite considerable! ''I notice there does not seem much ineterst in Judyth Baker. I am curious if people here do not believe her? Or just waiting for more evidence?''Bill Byas ''You're obviously not serious. Notice the high number of both reads [38,000+] and replies [870+] in the existing thread below.'' List the number of posters. It's easy to make up to 5 hits in putting together a post and then set an autorefresh in action. It's not reads but hits. Subtract irrelevancies and there'd be a, I hypothesise, significantly lower number of actual posts/replies. I suspect many are viewing it as a Monty Pythonesk form of ridiculous humor. I know I am. Mike I too sometimes view Prof. Fetzer as the guy in Life of Brian? who keeps on taunting after having his arms and legs cut off. He doesn't take that as being defeated. BK Bill, There may be many issues where we do not see eye to eye, but brother you hit the NAIL on the head there! Best to you my new friend! Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now