David Josephs Posted November 6, 2012 Share Posted November 6, 2012 (edited) Whatever gives you your little jollies CL... See, what you AD HOM trolls forget is that the EVIDENCE is what's important... you want to believe you have a "reputation" here that's anything other than as a xxxxx, your self-indulgence knows no bounds. You, old man, are a joke... an ongoing, absurd, rambling, spitting, drooling joke... Watching you get all worked up into a lather... sitting at your computer teeth clinched... fat little fingers tapping away in your attempt to PROVE how right you are... Let's see there CL... how about a link to ANYONE AGREEING WITH YOU... . or a link to ANYTHING you've contributed here... Or a thread in which you have not exhibited xxxxx behavior.... Maybe, just maybe... Admin would prefer you spend some time FIXING your reputation... so that whenever you post we can ALL do something other than shake our heads and laugh.... But you're BIGGER THAN THE ISSUES aren't you CL... it's all about who you think you ARE, not what a pathetic attempt you continually make at proving a point. or how poorly you know that material, how poorly you understand the assassination... or how you connot commit to a position - you're a critic... plain and simple... nothing original comes from a critic... you need someone, anyone, to offer/create something... so you can show your off that BIG BRAIN of yours.... This will be it for me here... You go toil away at your PROOF so we all can see what a big man you are.... like so many others who have left because of your putrid stench all over this forum... I'll just check in from time to time to see if your story ever changes... xxxxx. Some examples Like I care Pat? I'm not interested in the SBT. I am interested in watching the intellectual honestly or lack thereof by certain individuals. Posted by Craig Lamson on 30 November 2011Stick that in your Cambridge peer review and smoke it jimmy. I know exactly what I an doing. I'm exposing you. To the truth. You should try it sometime instead of "peddling twaddle", as you so colorfully put it. and the infinitely amusing - CL's 3 little inches Posted by Craig Lamson on 16 December 2011And of course it is unimpeachable that at Betzner the jacket had a 3"+ fold of fabric on the back as witnessed by the fact that the shadow from JFK's neck which MUST fall over the entire width of his jacket collar at the rear center of his neck is hidden....by the 3"+ fold. Poof Cliff, you are done. Year after year and your story NEVER changes... "It is because Craig says it is" Now go back to bed, it's past your nap time Edited November 6, 2012 by David Josephs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now