John Dolva Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 Sure, whats wrong with being wrong? How would you ever learn? Exactly : dare to be wrong, dare to learn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 Varnell and his vaunted photo analysis skills are missing in action here. I wonder why? He makes a great show of his supposed ability to read and dissect the JFK photos but fails to give his opinion here. I wonder why? So cliffy, is the photo real or fake and why? Lets see what you are made of.... Cliff and Craig, I wonder, the two of you don't happen to be married or something? Sorry no. cliffy is the wrong gender....even though he argues like a girl... Ah, OK. I thought I'd detected the true signs of a long lasting love affair... Not near as long as you and Fetzer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn Viklund Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 Varnell and his vaunted photo analysis skills are missing in action here. I wonder why? He makes a great show of his supposed ability to read and dissect the JFK photos but fails to give his opinion here. I wonder why? So cliffy, is the photo real or fake and why? Lets see what you are made of.... Cliff and Craig, I wonder, the two of you don't happen to be married or something? Sorry no. cliffy is the wrong gender....even though he argues like a girl... Ah, OK. I thought I'd detected the true signs of a long lasting love affair... Not near as long as you and Fetzer. Hehehe....good answer, Cliff. (But, ours is only five months...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 1, 2010 Author Share Posted August 1, 2010 This has pretty much run its course. The image is a fake...taken of a real subject but the photo could not exist in a single exposure. Explained here. http://www.craiglamson.com/421.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dolva Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 Craig, was the camera accidentally bumped after 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 1, 2010 Author Share Posted August 1, 2010 Craig, was the camera accidentally bumped after 1? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 This has pretty much run its course. The image is a fake...taken of a real subject but the photo could not exist in a single exposure. Explained here. http://www.craiglamson.com/421.htm Why would anyone buy an explanation from Craig "I just make stuff up" Lamson"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 1, 2010 Author Share Posted August 1, 2010 (edited) This has pretty much run its course. The image is a fake...taken of a real subject but the photo could not exist in a single exposure. Explained here. http://www.craiglamson.com/421.htm Why would anyone buy an explanation from Craig "I just make stuff up" Lamson"? Why not? The truth is the truth. Besides I don't expect anyone to "buy" anything like you. They can test my results for themself. You on the other hand offer nothing. Why would anyone buy and explantion about how a shadow works from cliffy ( i don't know how the SUN works) varnell? Edited August 1, 2010 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 This has pretty much run its course. The image is a fake...taken of a real subject but the photo could not exist in a single exposure. Explained here. http://www.craiglamson.com/421.htm Why would anyone buy an explanation from Craig "I just make stuff up" Lamson"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 1, 2010 Author Share Posted August 1, 2010 Hey chuckles, you ever gonna prove your claim about Mary Poppins or are you just a gasbag? Also you promised to prove cliffys silly claim ocrrect. That ever gonna happen or will you just let that one silde just like you did with your study on the Zapruder bush? I'm betting on gasbag. The perfect legacy for deano (lordy lordy I BELIEVE) hagerman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 The perfect legacy for deano (lordy lordy I BELIEVE) hagerman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 1, 2010 Author Share Posted August 1, 2010 The perfect legacy for deano (lordy lordy I BELIEVE) hagerman I was correct...deano is just a gasbag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 I posted my Pyracantha Bush study Craig, remember? Here are a couple of the pics I took of the bush in my front yard, maybe they will jog your memory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 1, 2010 Author Share Posted August 1, 2010 (edited) I posted my Pyracantha Bush study Craig, remember? Here are a couple of the pics I took of the bush in my front yard, maybe they will jog your memory How about the LINK to the actual post??? Lets see the work.... Edited August 1, 2010 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 I posted my Pyracantha Bush study Craig, remember? Here are a couple of the pics I took of the bush in my front yard, maybe they will jog your memory How about the LINK to the actual post??? Lets see the work.... I will look for it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now