Cliff Varnell Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 This has pretty much run its course. The image is a fake...taken of a real subject but the photo could not exist in a single exposure. Explained here. http://www.craiglamson.com/421.htm Why would anyone buy an explanation from Craig "I just make stuff up" Lamson"? Why not? The truth is the truth. The truth is obviously not your concern here, Craig. You've revealed yourself to be a fraud by claiming that artifacts exist in photos that clearly do not exist, and you cannot identify. Again, since you've proven that you'll claim anything as long as it agrees with the official version of whatever historical event is under discussion, why should anyone take you seriously? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 (edited) Here is the link Craig "I need a study for every theory that Dean comes up with" Lamson Bush thread Edited August 1, 2010 by Dean Hagerman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn Viklund Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 I posted my Pyracantha Bush study Craig, remember? Here are a couple of the pics I took of the bush in my front yard, maybe they will jog your memory Dean, That looks civilised enough. When I live in Woodland, not too far from you, all of us saw places like that, paradise! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 (edited) Dean, That looks civilised enough. When I live in Woodland, not too far from you, all of us saw places like that, paradise! Woodland is nice, I believe that Northern Califonia is the most beautiful place on earth, I am very biased of course Edited August 1, 2010 by Dean Hagerman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 1, 2010 Author Share Posted August 1, 2010 (edited) The truth is obviously not your concern here, Craig. You've revealed yourself to be a fraud by claiming that artifacts exist in photos that clearly do not exist, and you cannot identify. Again, since you've proven that you'll claim anything as long as it agrees with the official version of whatever historical event is under discussion, why should anyone take you seriously? Poor cliify (i don't know how the SUN works) varnell. He is the worlds worst poor loser. Left with his 10 year old arguement in tatters and his positon proven to be false, all he has left is meaningless drivel. He can't prove his claim can actually work and he cannot refute the empirical evidence that destroys him. All he has left is falsehoods and and homs. He is a BROKEN man. His world view is broken and can't be repaired. Only those totally ignorant of how the SUN works believe him now. Ignorance breeds ignorance. cliff (i don't know how the sun works) varnell. A loser on all counts. Edited August 1, 2010 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 1, 2010 Author Share Posted August 1, 2010 Here is the link Craig "I need a study for every theory that Dean comes up with" Lamson Bush thread Yea, perfect, exactly as I remembered. You BLEW IT OFF! Just like Mary Poppins. Gasbag..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 1, 2010 Author Share Posted August 1, 2010 Yep. More blah blah blah. And blah. Yep thats all we ever get from jimmy (read the report...I don't need to READ the report) d, and cliffy (i don't know how the SUN works) varnell. Could not have said it better myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 Here is the link Craig "I need a study for every theory that Dean comes up with" Lamson Bush thread Yea, perfect, exactly as I remembered. You BLEW IT OFF! Just like Mary Poppins. Gasbag..... That thread did get cut off a little short, I thought I posted a more in depth study of the pictures I took I guess I didnt, unless I posted more on Duncans forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 jimmy (read the report...I don't need to READ the report) d, and cliffy (i don't know how the SUN works) varnell. Craig your killing me, im gonna have a stroke if I keep laughing like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 1, 2010 Author Share Posted August 1, 2010 (edited) jimmy (read the report...I don't need to READ the report) d, and cliffy (i don't know how the SUN works) varnell. Craig your killing me, im gonna have a stroke if I keep laughing like this Why not quit laughing and post those artifacts in Z that are like Mary Poppins... Edited August 1, 2010 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 jimmy (read the report...I don't need to READ the report) d, and cliffy (i don't know how the SUN works) varnell. Craig your killing me, im gonna have a stroke if I keep laughing like this Why not quit laughing and post those artifacts in Z that are like Mary Poppins... Again why post it when all you have to do is reach into your bookshelf and then read? You are the only one asking Craig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 1, 2010 Author Share Posted August 1, 2010 Again why post it when all you have to do is reach into your bookshelf and then read? You are the only one asking Craig And again WHY NOT? How can we know WHAT claims you are making if you can't SHOW us what those claim are? And how can you PROVE your claim if you can't SHOW your claim. Why the reluctance? What are you afraid of? Gasbag..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 How can we know WHAT claims you are making if you can't SHOW us what those claim are? Who is we and us? Dont you mean you and yourself You can see those claims by reaching into your bookshelf Whats wrong? Do you have two broken arms and legs? Are you afraid you might open up TGZFH and agree with it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 1, 2010 Author Share Posted August 1, 2010 How can we know WHAT claims you are making if you can't SHOW us what those claim are? Who is we and us? Dont you mean you and yourself You can see those claims by reaching into your bookshelf Whats wrong? Do you have two broken arms and legs? Are you afraid you might open up TGZFH and agree with it? WHAT CLAIMS? WHAT CLAIMS? WHAT CLAIMS? YOU said: "we see some of the same kinds of anomalies in the Z-film" WHAT ANOMOLIES? WHAT ANOMILIES? Your claim, your proof. Chicken? Cluck Cluck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted August 1, 2010 Share Posted August 1, 2010 How can we know WHAT claims you are making if you can't SHOW us what those claim are? Who is we and us? Dont you mean you and yourself You can see those claims by reaching into your bookshelf Whats wrong? Do you have two broken arms and legs? Are you afraid you might open up TGZFH and agree with it? WHAT CLAIMS? WHAT CLAIMS? WHAT CLAIMS? YOU said: "we see some of the same kinds of anomalies in the Z-film" WHAT ANOMOLIES? WHAT ANOMILIES? Your claim, your proof. Chicken? Cluck Cluck I didnt mean to type claims, I meant anomalies Im sure you could have figured out what I meant Craig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now