Jump to content
The Education Forum

complaint to Simkin and all moderators


Jack White
 Share

Recommended Posts

Regarding FETZER/BURTON APOLLO DEBATE thread started here and moved

to Conspiracies Forum...

Simkin and all moderators:

Burton is acting both as participant and moderator on this thread, ruling

that I will be put on moderation if I continue to post Apollo studies for

Burton and Fetzer to discuss. This is DESPICABLE. Burton should be

censured for this outrageous behavior. He is baffled by the studies I posted,

so he deleted them and threatened me. Outrageous!

Jack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An outrageous accusation, Jack.

Besides, take it to the complaints thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, you're quite right Dean, I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote deleted by moderator.

Jeez! The hostility on this forum simply staggers me. I expect that from the usual culprits, but what has Jack said that is so outrageous?

John unless I've missed some in joke here I really think you should apologise!

If what Jack says is true then we should all be concerned about how this forum is being moderated. I have issues about the moderation myself. I started a new thread a couple of days ago entitled "Why do we allow Nazis on this forum”. It lasted exactly 12 seconds before being removed and a PM sent by Kathy…

“I really don't know what is going on with it (why it is posted), and i made it invisible until Evan sees it, and he can let me know what he thinks”

Notwithstanding the appaling English grammar (and absence of any meaning!) are we saying that moderators have to KNOW why a member asks a question? And only then is it allowed to appear? Needless to say I have still received no reply as to why it was banned.

At times I get the impression that some moderators act like a Praetorian Guard that stamp on awkward posts, awkward threads and awkward conclusions.

Except for John are ALL the moderatore LNs?

Edited by Kathy Beckett
Removed offensive quote by another member from this post.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt very much that Evan is in any way baffled by Jacks claims. I, who am no expert at all, am not baffled. I am however baffled by the poor quality of them.

Jack makes an outrageous claim about knowing Evans thinking.

There's no joke. It's more a direct aussie way of saying what is so often said in snide insults we have to put up with on this forum all the time. Some topics are merely an endless series of insults.

If this direct response has the result of people contemplating this supposedly professional assemblage of scholars behaviour I would be pleased though I wont hold my breaath.

Of course Jack doesn't have a roll of barbed wire up his butt, but something is surely bothering him enough to spit the dummy. I suspect the whole charade is purely ego driven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack, if you took that roll of barbed wire out of your butt you might be able to think more clearly.

Jeez! The hostility on this forum simply staggers me. I expect that from the usual culprits, but what has Jack said that is so outrageous?

John unless I've missed some in joke here I really think you should apologise!

If what Jack says is true then we should all be concerned about how this forum is being moderated. I have issues about the moderation myself. I started a new thread a couple of days ago entitled "Why do we allow Nazis on this forum”. It lasted exactly 12 seconds before being removed and a PM sent by Kathy…

“I really don't know what is going on with it (why it is posted), and i made it invisible until Evan sees it, and he can let me know what he thinks”

Notwithstanding the appaling English grammar (and absence of any meaning!) are we saying that moderators have to KNOW why a member asks a question? And only then is it allowed to appear? Needless to say I have still received no reply as to why it was banned.

At times I get the impression that some moderators act like a Praetorian Guard that stamp on awkward posts, awkward threads and awkward conclusions.

Except for John are ALL the moderatore LNs?

Your thread was just a personal attack, and Evan agreed it should remain invisible. Your use of the term Nazi was inappropriate.

If someone would have started a Nazi thread about you,and I had seen it, it would have been made invisible, too.

I am not an LN. Yes, I do believe that Oswald was part of the conspiracy, to some degree. Antti Hyonen and Don Jeffries,as well as John Geraghty, are CTs as well. It shouldn't matter what belief system is involved. You knew that your thread was anything but "innocuous."

Edited by Kathy Beckett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jack,

I had no idea about this until you posted it. I'm sure Evan will post here later concerning this.

Edited by Kathy Beckett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote removed by moderator

Jeez! The hostility on this forum simply staggers me. I expect that from the usual culprits, but what has Jack said that is so outrageous?

John unless I've missed some in joke here I really think you should apologise!

If what Jack says is true then we should all be concerned about how this forum is being moderated. I have issues about the moderation myself. I started a new thread a couple of days ago entitled "Why do we allow Nazis on this forum”. It lasted exactly 12 seconds before being removed and a PM sent by Kathy…

“I really don't know what is going on with it (why it is posted), and i made it invisible until Evan sees it, and he can let me know what he thinks”

Notwithstanding the appaling English grammar (and absence of any meaning!) are we saying that moderators have to KNOW why a member asks a question? And only then is it allowed to appear? Needless to say I have still received no reply as to why it was banned.

At times I get the impression that some moderators act like a Praetorian Guard that stamp on awkward posts, awkward threads and awkward conclusions.

Except for John are ALL the moderatore LNs?

Your thread was just a personal attack, and Evan agreed it should remain invisible. Your use of the term Nazi was inappropriate.

If someone would have started a Nazi thread about you,and I had seen it, it would have been made invisible, too.

I am not an LN. Yes, I do believe that Oswald was part of the conspiracy, to some degree. Antti Hyonen and Don Jeffries are both CTs as well. It shouldn't matter what belief system is involved. You knew that your thread was anything but "innocuous."

A personal attack on who? I didn't name anyone!

Please Ms Becket can I use the word Fascist instead then?

Edited by Kathy Beckett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A while back, it was decided that all rulings should be done by at least 2 moderators.

I just make the problem posts invisible, and it gives the others opportunity to decide if it should be left out or not.

Kathy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote removed by moderator

Jeez! The hostility on this forum simply staggers me. I expect that from the usual culprits, but what has Jack said that is so outrageous?

John unless I've missed some in joke here I really think you should apologise!

If what Jack says is true then we should all be concerned about how this forum is being moderated. I have issues about the moderation myself. I started a new thread a couple of days ago entitled "Why do we allow Nazis on this forum”. It lasted exactly 12 seconds before being removed and a PM sent by Kathy…

“I really don't know what is going on with it (why it is posted), and i made it invisible until Evan sees it, and he can let me know what he thinks”

Notwithstanding the appaling English grammar (and absence of any meaning!) are we saying that moderators have to KNOW why a member asks a question? And only then is it allowed to appear? Needless to say I have still received no reply as to why it was banned.

At times I get the impression that some moderators act like a Praetorian Guard that stamp on awkward posts, awkward threads and awkward conclusions.

Except for John are ALL the moderatore LNs?

Your thread was just a personal attack, and Evan agreed it should remain invisible. Your use of the term Nazi was inappropriate.

If someone would have started a Nazi thread about you,and I had seen it, it would have been made invisible, too.

I am not an LN. Yes, I do believe that Oswald was part of the conspiracy, to some degree. Antti Hyonen and Don Jeffries are both CTs as well. It shouldn't matter what belief system is involved. You knew that your thread was anything but "innocuous."

A personal attack on who? I didn't name anyone!

Edited by Kathy Beckett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only did you start that thread, you added a post to it, remember? It has at least one name in it that you were speaking of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except for John are ALL the moderatore LNs?

Most of the moderators are quite sensible Bernie but most of them are not regularly on the forum very much now. John is the fairest. Kathy, is a bit of a "pollyanna" type and is a "Oswald was part of a conspiracy" theorist.

There was a moderator once who was simply a "nut" but he spontaneously combusted through anger and paranoia.

Hi Lee

Thanks for that...you almost need a route map on here to determine who is who. I see you're from 'pool...wrong end of the M62 if you ask me...but great people anyway.

Take care.

Bernie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...