Jump to content
The Education Forum


Recommended Posts

Thanks for updating us on that David. I think Bill Simpich's series of articles are the most important things going on right now.

As for OpEd News, someone reposted my early review of Jim Douglas' book, and I got some emails from people who read it there.

But they rejected a book review I wrote of Doug Horne's IARRB, though they push Thom Hartman and the mob killed Kennedy angle with no problems.

When I recently tried to repost the Minister of Diz at DP from CTKA at OpEd,


I got this response from one of their editors:

I just browsed through the article. I have difficulty using the screens for editors to make comments, and I still don't fully understand the editorial philosophy of OpEd News. Obviously this article represents extensive work and documentation.

It is difficult for me to evaluate fairly since I happen to be convinced that Oswald was, in fact, the sole disturbed individual who shot JFK. Having been an adult when the assassination occurred I was able to follow the unfolding events.

At this point, almost a half century after the event, opinions have congealed. Just as there are those convinced that Jesus rose after three days, or that it is a myth, beliefs about the JFK murder are entrenched, and arguments are meaningless.

So, a given publication either becomes dedicated to this dialogue or it refuses such content. I read the FAQ on this site, and I don't see any new information on the event in this article. So I would vote that it be rejected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the rejction is based on a flawed understanding of the oped thingy and a browse and a look at the FAQ is sufficient for rejection it's the rejection that needs rejection. (imo)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now
  • Create New...