Len Colby Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 It should also be pointed out that the subtitle of the thread "The loss of his seat gave the Senate to the GOP" is inaccurate because: The Senate was split 51 - 49 during the 108th Congress so even if Wellstone or Mondale had won the split would have been 50 - 50 and Chenney would have been the tie breaker just as he was at the begining of the 107th Congress. Wellstone's victory was not guaranteed Wellsstone's death did not guarantee Coleman's victory infact in the 1st post crash poll Mondale gained a few points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 WELLSTONE: THEY KILLED HIM (Snowshoe Films) http://www.snowshoefilms.com/wellstone.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted December 3, 2010 Share Posted December 3, 2010 So someone made a "documentary" and repeated your fallacies. OMG someone claims to have heard rifle shots in a hunting area, except that you thing the plane was brought down by a mythical deathray. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted December 4, 2010 Share Posted December 4, 2010 I expected some brainless remarks like these from the likes of you. Dozens and dozens of witnesses were interviewed on every aspect of this case. The sound of "rifle shots" was probably the popping of different electronic systems on the plane when it entered the EMP field. But I wouldn't expect someone with your limits to understand. So someone made a "documentary" and repeated your fallacies. OMG someone claims to have heard rifle shots in a hunting area, except that you thing the plane was brought down by a mythical deathray. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Both witnesses said they though (initially at least) the popping sonds were from a rifle. I don’t have the time to debunk an entire 2 hour `documentary’ most of its claims echo your long debunked ones. Identify 5 – 6 parts of it that you consider especially telling and I’ll reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now