John Navin Posted January 11, 2011 Share Posted January 11, 2011 1)The "assassin" is inevitably reported to be a loner. 2)The "assassin" is reported to be some kind of nut, often described as somehow mentally unfit. 3)After a period of time, the initial evidence is eventually found to be questionable. 4)Months later, often years later, independent researchers discover new evidence that renders the original conclusions completely inoperative. 5) Independent researchers, years later, discover that the "loner" actually had quite a few contacts, usually with shady characters who often seem to have intelligence connections. 6)The traditional media ridicules and marginalizes the independent researchers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now