Walt Brown

[Ron Ecker]

I am told by Gary Mack that the print in question was a palm print, not a fingerprint as identified by Darby and referred to here and elsewhere. He cites CE3131.

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh26/html/WH_Vol26_0418a.htm

[Kathleen Collins]

Kathy like they above say, no problemo...i make oodles and have of mistooks, oops another one, so what, when one does, one learns something new......it is when the whomever refuses to learn from such that gets them in double dutch eventually, btw this is our walt brown..b

I don't think it was last year but the year before. Assassination experts were giving speeches over the Internet. COPA. I wanted so much to hear Walt Brown, but he forgot to turn the mike on or something. All I could see was him, pressing buttons and saying, "Hello, COPA" a dozen times. That lasted 10 minutes. And when John Armstrong was on, he couldn't remember names from his own book and wanted the audience to help him. And when the question and answer part began, the videographer shut off his camera.

Boy was I riled.

Kathy C

[Guest Robert Morrow]

I am told by Gary Mack that the print in question was a palm print, not a fingerprint as identified by Darby and referred to here and elsewhere. He cites CE3131.

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh26/html/WH_Vol26_0418a.htm

Rankin's letter clearly says it was a latent palm print... that does not mean that it WAS a palm print. I think Barr McClellan got the print from the government and I think it was a left pinky print.

So someone needs to figure out this discrepancy.

Also, here is Walt Brown's book The Warren Ommission:

http://www.amazon.com/Warren-Ommission-Walt-Brown/dp/1887934138/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1309677496&sr=1-1

Basically, it breaks down the failings of the Warren Report in great detail. Written by a man, Walt Brown, who has an almost encyclopedic knowledge of the JFK Assassination. It is must own for any JFK libary!

Edited July 3, 2011 by Robert Morrow