Jump to content
The Education Forum

Guns of the Regressive Right or How to Kill a President


Guest Robert Morrow
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Robert Morrow

"Guns of the Regressive Right Or How to Kill a President: the Only Reconstruction of the Kennedy Assassination That Makes Sense" by Morris A. Beale - 1964

http://www.amazon.com/Guns-Regressive-Right-Kill-President/dp/B001B3MPJY/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1322954601&sr=1-3-fkmr0

Here is my newly written, brief review at Amazon of this excellent book.

Morris Beale nailed the JFK assassination in real time. This novel, with thinly camouflaged characters and players in the JFK assassination, is worth more than the combined 48 years of reporting on the JFK assassination. That is a comment on how insightful this book is and what a load of horse manure the NY Times (and their CIA/CFR controlled brothers in the MSM) have been dishing out on the 1963 Coup d'Etat for decades.

This book's brief forward:

"The interpolative story of how a President was killed. A compilation of known facts, the known modus operandi of certain personnel plus the hidden probabilities and possibilities, in semi-fictional form."

This book has it all: the Texas oil men, the Eastern bankers, the CIA, the media cover up, Lyndon Johnson, the Warren Commission farce, Oswald the patsy, New Orleans, etc.

It is all there. Written in real time in 1964.

Bingo! Buy this book.

Edited by Robert Morrow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

"Guns of the Regressive Right Or How to Kill a President: the Only Reconstruction of the Kennedy Assassination That Makes Sense" by Morris A. Beale - 1964

Here is my newly written, brief review at Amazon of this excellent book.

Morris Beale nailed the JFK assassination in real time. This novel, with thinly camouflaged characters and players in the JFK assassination, is worth more than the combined 48 years of reporting on the JFK assassination. That is a comment on how insightful this book is and what a load of horse manure the NY Times (and their CIA/CFR controlled brothers in the MSM) have been dishing out on the 1963 Coup d'Etat for decades.

This book's brief forward:

"The interpolative story of how a President was killed. A compilation of known facts, the known modus operandi of certain personnel plus the hidden probabilities and possibilities, in semi-fictional form."

This book has it all: the Texas oil men, the Eastern bankers, the CIA, the media cover up, Lyndon Johnson, the Warren Commission farce, Oswald the patsy, New Orleans, etc.

It is all there. Written in real time in 1964.

Bingo! Buy this book.

==========

This sounds like the same Morris Bealle that wrote a book called The Drug Story, which was all about the Rockefeller drug empire.

Bealle, seems like, was a Chicago Newspaper Man and knew well the ways of the Rockefellers and their use of corporation methods to gain control over areas and their politics.

Communism just ran over the Rockefeller corportation methods by limiting land an industry ownership, and that tossed lots of Rockefeller interests out of South and Central America. And Russia and China.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Guns of the Regressive Right Or How to Kill a President: the Only Reconstruction of the Kennedy Assassination That Makes Sense" by Morris A. Beale - 1964

Here is my newly written, brief review at Amazon of this excellent book.

Morris Beale nailed the JFK assassination in real time. This novel, with thinly camouflaged characters and players in the JFK assassination, is worth more than the combined 48 years of reporting on the JFK assassination. That is a comment on how insightful this book is and what a load of horse manure the NY Times (and their CIA/CFR controlled brothers in the MSM) have been dishing out on the 1963 Coup d'Etat for decades.

This book's brief forward:

"The interpolative story of how a President was killed. A compilation of known facts, the known modus operandi of certain personnel plus the hidden probabilities and possibilities, in semi-fictional form."

This book has it all: the Texas oil men, the Eastern bankers, the CIA, the media cover up, Lyndon Johnson, the Warren Commission farce, Oswald the patsy, New Orleans, etc.

It is all there. Written in real time in 1964.

Bingo! Buy this book.

It's all a slam dunk?

Robert, when taking part of your theories of who dune it, it's not a question of whom to include. It's more a question of whom to exclude.

"This book has it all: the Texas oil men, the Eastern bankers, the CIA, the media cover up, Lyndon Johnson, the Warren Commission farce, Oswald the patsy, New Orleans, etc."

Fine. Let's assume you are correct and that all of those people are involved in the assassination.

My question to you Robert, is this: where are the evidence? Where are the indications? Please, do not refer to lengthy books or otherwise..as you seems to have most of the assassination mysteries figured out: just sum up a few hardcore indications or evidence of the guilt of those you constantly accuse?

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slight correction on Bealle, he was the Washington Times or Herald and wrote the principle books that exposed the Rockefellers.

http://educate-yourself.org/fc/drugstory.shtml

Rockefeller's methods was to cover up the damages that industry emissions do to human health and form the AMA to never blame industrial emissions as reason to suspect those pollutants as causing harm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Robert Morrow

"Guns of the Regressive Right Or How to Kill a President: the Only Reconstruction of the Kennedy Assassination That Makes Sense" by Morris A. Beale - 1964

Here is my newly written, brief review at Amazon of this excellent book.

Morris Beale nailed the JFK assassination in real time. This novel, with thinly camouflaged characters and players in the JFK assassination, is worth more than the combined 48 years of reporting on the JFK assassination. That is a comment on how insightful this book is and what a load of horse manure the NY Times (and their CIA/CFR controlled brothers in the MSM) have been dishing out on the 1963 Coup d'Etat for decades.

This book's brief forward:

"The interpolative story of how a President was killed. A compilation of known facts, the known modus operandi of certain personnel plus the hidden probabilities and possibilities, in semi-fictional form."

This book has it all: the Texas oil men, the Eastern bankers, the CIA, the media cover up, Lyndon Johnson, the Warren Commission farce, Oswald the patsy, New Orleans, etc.

It is all there. Written in real time in 1964.

Bingo! Buy this book.

It's all a slam dunk?

Robert, when taking part of your theories of who dune it, it's not a question of whom to include. It's more a question of whom to exclude.

"This book has it all: the Texas oil men, the Eastern bankers, the CIA, the media cover up, Lyndon Johnson, the Warren Commission farce, Oswald the patsy, New Orleans, etc."

Fine. Let's assume you are correct and that all of those people are involved in the assassination.

My question to you Robert, is this: where are the evidence? Where are the indications? Please, do not refer to lengthy books or otherwise..as you seems to have most of the assassination mysteries figured out: just sum up a few hardcore indications or evidence of the guilt of those you constantly accuse?

Thanks.

Glenn,

The JFK assassination can be summed up like this: Lyndon Johnson and his key Texas oil men supporters Clint Murchison, Sr. and H.L. Hunt used their CIA/military connections to murder JFK for a variety of reasons both personal and ideological. LBJ's comments to Madeleine Brown on 12/31/63 are extremely important; LBJ told her it was Texas oil men that she knew in Dallas and "renegade intelligence bastards" that murdered John Kennedy. Although not named by LBJ, those oil men would have been Murchison, Sr. and H.L. Hunt because they were at the peak of the LBJ hierachy.

As for the "who" of CIA participation, this has been covered in many books and articles. Allen Dulles, again, has hierarchy here. Lansdale was identifed at TSBD. GHW Bush is covered in Family of Secrets. E. Howard Hunt semi-confessed and implicated Sturgis. James Angleton is very likely to have been running US intelligence agent Oswald. David Atlee Phillips perjured himself to the HSCA, was seen by Veciana with Oswald and was strongly suspected by his own family (in fact his brother cut of relations with Phillips over this matter).

Post assassination, it was obviously Lyndon Johnson and his close friend and neighbor of 19 years J. Edgar Hoover who covered up the JFK assassination. Every credible JFK researcher will agree to this last point. And then it was CIA Allen Dulles (very likely a high level participant in JFK assassination) who managed the cover up along on the Warren Commission along with another deep CIA/CFR man John J. McCloy and Gerald Ford, the FBI informer to Hoover and also identified by Newsweek at the CIA's man in Congress.

From that point on the JFK assassination failed cover up was managed by the Council on Foreign Relations whose inner circle leadership for decades has been dominated by inner circle CIA (Allen Dulles, John J. McCloy, Nelson Rockefeller, David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, George Herbert Walker Bush). Any time you hear an opinion maker on TV say something really stupid about the JFK assassination (lone nutter advocacy; not admitting Oswald was US intelligence), just google their "name CFR" ... or example "George Will CFR" or "Charles Krauthammer CFR" The CFR has been heavily manipulated by CIA Operation Mockingbird and the #1 crime they attempt to cover up - even 50 years later -is the JFK asssassination and that is because the CIA murdered John Kennedy.

With the help and participation of Lyndon Johnson, Clint Murchison, Sr. and H.L. Hunt - all with deep CIA/military connections. Like Vincent Salandria used to say early on, the JFK assassination was a coup d'etat and it is a "false mystery" as to what happened.

Edited by Robert Morrow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Robert Morrow

"Guns of the Regressive Right Or How to Kill a President: the Only Reconstruction of the Kennedy Assassination That Makes Sense" by Morris A. Beale - 1964

Here is my newly written, brief review at Amazon of this excellent book.

Morris Beale nailed the JFK assassination in real time. This novel, with thinly camouflaged characters and players in the JFK assassination, is worth more than the combined 48 years of reporting on the JFK assassination. That is a comment on how insightful this book is and what a load of horse manure the NY Times (and their CIA/CFR controlled brothers in the MSM) have been dishing out on the 1963 Coup d'Etat for decades.

This book's brief forward:

"The interpolative story of how a President was killed. A compilation of known facts, the known modus operandi of certain personnel plus the hidden probabilities and possibilities, in semi-fictional form."

This book has it all: the Texas oil men, the Eastern bankers, the CIA, the media cover up, Lyndon Johnson, the Warren Commission farce, Oswald the patsy, New Orleans, etc.

It is all there. Written in real time in 1964.

Bingo! Buy this book.

==========

This sounds like the same Morris Bealle that wrote a book called The Drug Story, which was all about the Rockefeller drug empire.

Bealle, seems like, was a Chicago Newspaper Man and knew well the ways of the Rockefellers and their use of corporation methods to gain control over areas and their politics.

Communism just ran over the Rockefeller corportation methods by limiting land an industry ownership, and that tossed lots of Rockefeller interests out of South and Central America. And Russia and China.

Morris Beale apparently wrote some high quality material, including a book on the Rockefellers:

http://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=4425836878&searchurl=bsi%3D90%26kn%3Dmorris%2Bbealle%26x%3D40%26y%3D10

and a biography on Drew Pearson, then the dean of American political columnists:

http://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=4772938292&searchurl=bsi%3D30%26kn%3Dmorris%2Bbealle%26x%3D40%26y%3D10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert,

I think you are close and far off in other areas. LHO was not a CIA type, but he knew lots of the folks that JFK shut down that were CIA.

LHO worked for the PERMINDEX and HL Hunt alliances, because the CIA and US president would not do what they wanted to happen. JFK had most of the CIA shut down on Cuba. JFK was getting lots of flack with the PERMINDEX operations that looked all too much like the CIA workings.

LBJ comes into the picture not as the prime plotter against JFK, but one getting a free ride if he helps cover it all up for the Houston/Dallas/PERMINDEX alliances against Communism and working up political unrest against Communism.

All points to the Bilderbergers and PERMINDEX kicking things off in Cuba and ousting Batista, and things we off course when Castro was temped with Russian Oil. The Bilderbergers managed, via Rockefeller, to set up the JBS thing to push Eisenhower on Cuba, and also to push JFK on Cuba. JFK figured out who and what was screwing him at every turn and it was these Foreign Intelligence associations working inside the US.

It is interesting that even in the Movie JFK the movie producer made the language in the boxes from Schlumberger as Spanish, when they were in French.

Robert, I think the part you are totally missing or unwilling to included is the Foreign Intelligence element working in the USA and trying to make LHO as a CIA asset, when he was really a PERMINDEX Fascist agent for a time, and learned better that these operations were not for the best.

LHO in New Orleans was busy doing the Banister stuff to look for Communists in the US, and all the while being set up for being a Communist supporter. When the move LHO over to Dallas, he gets into finding the Facist elements that are after killing JFK. That ends up being HL Hunt, General Walker, and these Houston and Dallas associations with PERMINDEX.

I don't think LHO was a CIA asset. I think there were lots of Bench Sitters in the CIA that were more than happen to do the LBJ tactic of playing along with the JFK hit, but they all knew it was a Foreign Intelligence hit that they all benefitted. Hoover was playing along, like LBJ. and they were sure not going to blow the whistle on what really happened.

The Blame game goes toward PERMINDEX and lots of CIA Bench Sitters looking the other way for the Foreign Intelligence Invastion of the US that has the US being taken over from within. Follow the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Guns of the Regressive Right Or How to Kill a President: the Only Reconstruction of the Kennedy Assassination That Makes Sense" by Morris A. Beale - 1964

Here is my newly written, brief review at Amazon of this excellent book.

Morris Beale nailed the JFK assassination in real time. This novel, with thinly camouflaged characters and players in the JFK assassination, is worth more than the combined 48 years of reporting on the JFK assassination. That is a comment on how insightful this book is and what a load of horse manure the NY Times (and their CIA/CFR controlled brothers in the MSM) have been dishing out on the 1963 Coup d'Etat for decades.

This book's brief forward:

"The interpolative story of how a President was killed. A compilation of known facts, the known modus operandi of certain personnel plus the hidden probabilities and possibilities, in semi-fictional form."

This book has it all: the Texas oil men, the Eastern bankers, the CIA, the media cover up, Lyndon Johnson, the Warren Commission farce, Oswald the patsy, New Orleans, etc.

It is all there. Written in real time in 1964.

Bingo! Buy this book.

==========

This sounds like the same Morris Bealle that wrote a book called The Drug Story, which was all about the Rockefeller drug empire.

Bealle, seems like, was a Chicago Newspaper Man and knew well the ways of the Rockefellers and their use of corporation methods to gain control over areas and their politics.

Communism just ran over the Rockefeller corportation methods by limiting land an industry ownership, and that tossed lots of Rockefeller interests out of South and Central America. And Russia and China.

Morris Beale apparently wrote some high quality material, including a book on the Rockefellers:

http://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=4425836878&searchurl=bsi%3D90%26kn%3Dmorris%2Bbealle%26x%3D40%26y%3D10

and a biography on Drew Pearson, then the dean of American political columnists:

http://www.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=4772938292&searchurl=bsi%3D30%26kn%3Dmorris%2Bbealle%26x%3D40%26y%3D10

======

Morris Bealle was one highly informed Newspaper man from DC, who didn't shade the truth on Rockefeller's games for fascism.

If folks read his writings you'll be more than 3/4 of the way toward understanding the domestic and foreign elements in the JFK hit.

The biggest elements against JFK were the allied Foreign Interest that wanted to drag the US into wars against Communism using deceit and treachery methods and outright murder.

Sorting out what was PERMINDEX Foreign Intelligence operations in the US and what was CIA is often the crux of the problems for many to understand. PERMINDEX and the CIA used very similar methods, yet one method was domestic US oriented and the Other the Foreign Interests of the Old Money Europeans that have drenched their continent in war after war and these being the same issues that Thomas Jefferson warned the US from becoming involved.

Real solving the JFK assassination would have shown Houston's DeMenil, Dallas's Nagy, New Orleas Shaw, HL Hunt, General Walker the firing squad for being Foreign Interest traitors. LBJ and Hoover would go down the same sort of way for conspiring to cover up these Foreign Factions that wanted JFK dead, as they wanted JFK dead too. Hoover and LBJ were complicit both before the Assassination and Afterwards.

If the Russians were on top of things, if they managed to shoot HL Hunt in the JFK aftermath, they would have the Royalist side of extreme right capitalism go to war with the US brand of Capitalism. The US would have nuked the City of London Financial District and the UK would have blown up DC and NYC. But everyone would have know who was behing the JFK murder world wide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.amazon.com/review/R201FAZLB1ZD40

I gave the Morris Bealle Books a high Thumbs UP, as Bealle would never sell out to the Corporatists. Rare Breed in newspaper men. I don't think any Morris Bealles exist in todays reporting.

Morris Bealle was one of the rare Newspaper Men of the times. His several books on the Rockefellers are highly important historical accounts that get one very close to solving the JFK assassination.

Rockefeller esentially taught Germany the value of Corportatism and this grew into the Hitler IG Farben machine and their NW7 Espionage system. After the war, the resurrected IG Farben was brought back to life by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, at the invitation of Victor Rothschild of the UK. Bernhard was a NAZI and kingpin of IG Farben.

The reinvented IG Farben for the European Old Money Royalists was the Bilderberg alliances and their Espionage Unit was PERMINDEX. Their PERMINDEX Foreign Intelligence highly invaded the US and were working schemes with Rockefeller using the John Birch Society to snare the US into doing their work of making wars against Communism. JFK was doing the opposite of making peace with Russia and Cuba and doing the things that Khruschev started with Eisenhower after the death of Stalin.

The truth on JFK is this Foreign Intelligence unit, modeled upon the Corporation methods of Rockefeller, became the mainly foreign coup that killed JFK. PERMINDEX agents were all over the US from Shaw in NO, Nagy in Dallas, DeMenil in Houston, to Bloomfield working for DISC and FBI Div 5. The Texas 8F group was allied with the PERMINDEX ideals and LBJ and Hoover came to support the same via HL Hunt and General Walker.

Morris Bealle's reporting the truth of these Rockefeller based needs for World Corporatism, as the Fascist Element worse than Communism, that took control over America. This book and the others by Morris Bealle are essential for those seeking how America has fallen from within.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

http://www.amazon.com/review/R201FAZLB1ZD40

I gave the Morris Bealle Books a high Thumbs UP, as Bealle would never sell out to the Corporatists. Rare Breed in newspaper men. I don't think any Morris Bealles exist in todays reporting.

Morris Bealle was one of the rare Newspaper Men of the times. His several books on the Rockefellers are highly important historical accounts that get one very close to solving the JFK assassination...

In Morris Bealle's, GUNS OF THE REGRESSIVE RIGHT, we have a fictional account of a Presidential Assassination. President Joe Smith (i.e. JFK) is in conflict with the John Spruce Society (i.e. JBS). The 'Establishment' of 'Invisible Men' is in-between them - promoting communism in Latin America in order to produce chaos so that their Corporations can move in under the pretext of restoring order.

President Smith and his younger brother (i.e. RFK) are raising so many barriers for their international plot that they hire a foreign expert 'Santos' to develop a plan to assassination the President. Santos hires a professional hit man Sammy Tata, for $100,000 (where 1963 dollars are worth ten times more today). He also hires Grant Osteen (i.e. Lee Harvey Oswald), a disgruntled ex-Marine with a dishonorable discharge for once defecting to Russia, for $50,000. He also hires a coordinator, Colonel Mark McClay, a WW2 veteran and an expert in the US bureaucracy (i.e. Walker?) and finally, a member of the mafia, Bimstein, to eliminate both the hit-man and the decoy on the get-away boat (i.e. Ruby).

Everything goes according to plan until Osteen is arrested unexpectedly. The writing is good, and I am impressed at how many pieces Bealle correctly guessed in 1964.

Best regards...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul, on the whole I find your posts a breath of fresh air. I don't get this sentence : ''promoting communism in Latin America in order to produce chaos so that their Corporations can move in under the pretext of restoring order'' - Could you elaborate or clarify it, please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul, on the whole I find your posts a breath of fresh air. I don't get this sentence : ''promoting communism in Latin America in order to produce chaos so that their Corporations can move in under the pretext of restoring order'' - Could you elaborate or clarify it, please?

Thanks for the response, John. I am continually impressed at how influential the extreme right-wing commentator, Dan Smoot, has become with left-wing theoreticians. This situation shows again the victory of the right over the left in the USA.

Anyway, as Dan Smoot wrote in his 1962 book, 'The Invisible Government,' World Communism was never a conspiracy of the working class, rather, it was always a conspiracy of the super-rich elite to solidify and concentrate their power in the world. In Latin America, for example, they would suppor communist radicals to take over a Latin American country, and when the revolution was completed, they would march in with USA forces and 'liberate' that country from communist dictatorship, and wipe out those same communist radicals they supported the year before. Then their Corporations would take over the markets of that area and impose their will.

Their plan was working well, said Smoot, until Castro's Cuba. Kennedy refused to let them complete their mission. Now, Dan Smoot is considered amongst the extremists in the right-wing, because he openly proclaimed that the USA Establishment in Washington DC were 'communist supporters' and therefore could be accused of Communism, so that Joe McCarthy would be vindicated.

So, when Morris A. Bealle writes in 1964 that this Establishment of 'Invisible Men' found the President to be getting in the way of their plans, he really had the model of Dan Smoot in mind!

Best regards,

--Paul Trejo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank's Paul.

But they already had 'the market' and, taking Nicaragua as an example, trained funded and supported in all ways the fight against the Sandinistas. They lost Somoza and were in danger of losing much more.

The recent formation of the Latin American group of solidarity and the various other ways that this region seeks to throw off the yoke of US Imperialism seems to me a logical process going back to Jose Marti, Sandino, Zapata even and others. One could also look at Marxs disbanding the First International in order to form a second one free from the influence of the Swiss Guilds. IMO It's the actions by the wage or otherwise slaves that drive the Revolutions whether it be Cromwells Peasants or Fidels Guerillas. To expect any concessions from the inevitable counterrevolutions is silly and I think it doesn't need any input from Smoot to clarify it. I suppose some would like to disempower a united working class and it seems to me that Smoots notion creates a palatable world view for some if not many.

BTW I reckon you going after Walker is probably right on the money.

edit typos

Edited by John Dolva
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank's Paul.

But they already had 'the market' and, taking Nicaragua as an example, trained funded and supported in all ways the fight against the Sandinistas. They lost Somoza and were in danger of losing much more.

The recent formation of the Latin American group of solidarity and the various other ways that this region seeks to throw off the yoke of US Imperialism seems to me a logical process going back to Jose Marti, Sandino, Zapata even and others. One could also look at Marx's disbanding the First International in order to form a second one free from the influence of the Swiss Guilds. IMO It's the actions by the wage or otherwise slaves that drive the Revolutions whether it be Cromwells Peasants or Fidels Guerillas. To expect any concessions from the inevitable counterrevolutions is silly and I think it doesn't need any input from Smoot to clarify it. I suppose some would like to disempower a united working class and it seems to me that Smoots notion creates a palatable world view for some if not many.

BTW I reckon you going after Walker is probably right on the money.

edit typos

You're right about Nicaragua, John. Yet Bealle would probably have asked 'who put the Sandinistas there in the first place?' He would have proposed that the Establishment put the Sandanistas in there to justify a larger military presence in order to expand business far beyond their tiny markets there.

Again - this is the fictional theory of Bealle based on the fictional fantasy of Dan Smoot and the later John Birch Society. The notion of grass-roots left-wing protests was entirely lost on the extreme right-wing. They didn't care about it a bit - but their ideology of making all these global left-wing movements into the puppets of Corporate Giants turned out to be brilliant -- said Jean-Paul Sartre -- because they actually distracted a significant portion of the intelligensia away from the Marxist paradigm.

That said, the Marxist paradigm was fatally flawed in many ways, from the start. Inspired by a Luddite mentality that wanted to freeze Industry at the level of the 1890's, not much traction could be obtained. Also, I was at the Iron Curtain in the late 70's, in Finland and Berlin, and I saw first hand the start of the Fall of the USSR. They outlawed common *distribution!*

The Marxists saw any profit, including the simple profit owed to individual transportation, as a Crime! They canonized Production, and criminalized Distribution! That was why people stood in long lines for hours for basic groceries. All to stop profits? Even in the late 1970's the impartial observer could predict that the Russian housewives would be forced to go to the Black Market just to keep their households afloat! At this rate the Black Market would be larger than the overground market by 1990. Well, that is exactly what happened! The Russian Mafia took over the USSR, and now they run Russia!

So, I agree with you that the Smoot version of the left-wing was completely upside-down. But that may have been deliberate. Yet I'm not sure that I agree with you about the nature and prospects of the left-wing.

Without a Labor Party in the USA (and in South American generally) there is no actual foothold that the majority of workers can obtain in politics. Most radical groups are more trouble than they're worth. People who pay low wages are not immediately life-threatening - but a revolution is. Also, if the industrialists move out of a nation, mass poverty moves in, not better conditions.

The problem with the underdeveloped regions is that they were drowning in poverty in the first place - and that was nobody's fault but their own.

When the Corporations arrive to exploit them, many if not most of the poverty-stricken think of the exploitation in a positive sense. As for the revolutionaries, they propose a potentially deadly "solution" to a problem that they (and their books) best understand. This best explains their century-long history of dismal failure.

The failure of the left-wing in the Americas is a historical novel in itself. The right-wing ideologies dominate not only the USA, but also South America. Only a bona-fide Labor Party in the Americas would change my mind. I don't see it on the horizon.

Also - I appreciate your vote of confidence in my Walker theory of the JFK conspiracy. Every little bit helps.

Best regards,

--Paul Trejo

Edited by Paul Trejo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how much a member of the Marxist intelligensia would be swayed by Smoot. I find this part interesting :'' They didn't care about it a bit - but their ideology of making all these global left-wing movements into the puppets of Corporate Giants turned out to be brilliant -- said Jean-Paul Sartre -- because they actually distrated a significant portion of the intelligensia away from the Marxist paradigm'' I take Sartre seriously so I think this quote from him (if it is, or even if it's a particular persons 'interpretation') needs to be looked at in full context. Obviously the monroe doctrine needs to be considered as well.

Anyway, if we choose we could cover lots here that really might not have so much to do with that which we do have in common, namely Walker as pivotal. In this context the clarification about the Bealle fictions. And they certainly served a pupose of providing a palatable world view to people in a part of the world being ripped apart by systemic contradictions. Further on that particular matter. I find that most people react to circumstances most with pressure on the hip pocket nerve. That was not being applied by Cuba. That was being applied by the enormous nation wide economic shifts threatened by centuries old structures that would have to change as the world focused on the equal rights situation of the USofA at a time when TV developed dramatically during the Kennedy administration. How could the USofA possibly excert any moral force in the world when the world was finding out about the mess in the USoAs own back yard? No wonder that Kennedy himself sought to diminish the Oxford days ( The Ghosts Of Mississippi ) of late sep earl;y oct '62, still obfuscated today..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...