ANOTHER TEXAS EXONERATIION

[J. Raymond Carroll]

No one is accusing Oswald of anything more than being named in this document by others who we know nothing about and should know more.

Give it up BILL

YOU of all people should know by now

that Oswald accusers

are the world's biggest bunch

OF LOSERS

[Guest Tom Scully]

My reasoning is that the only relevance is that the investigating of this crime was botched and it happened in the state of Texas and JFK was assassinated in Texas.

Tom, I submit that your real reasoning is that you believe Lee Oswald was guilty

of some involvement in the JFK assassination

although you are not sure in what way exactly.

So you and other false accusers don't like it when the mindset of false accusers

is exposed to the light.

John Raley is determined to prove, and time will tell if he is right

that the investigation of the Morton murder wan't botched, as you claim

but that Morton was deliberately framed

by the prosecutor who concealed proof of Morton's innocence.

A few of us know that that something similar happened in the case of Lee Oswald.

The first round of false accusers claimed that Lee was a lone assassin

while the second round of false accusers claim he was part of the conspiracy.

Not much difference between the the two sets of false accusers in my book.

As I have aid before, it beats me

how you came to be a moderator on this forum

with your agenda-driven style of moderation.

This isn't about, me. You're on your own with whatever you make up concerning your fantasy of my hidden attitude towards Lee Harvey Oswald and his culpability.

Thanks, Ray, for clearing this up. You've started this thread because you believe this story is a political conspiracy story. It follows, then, that this thread will fit in well in the section of the Education Forum devoted to political conspiracy.

[J. Raymond Carroll]

You've started this thread because you believe this story is a political conspiracy story.

As a MIND-READER you are not qualified.

I started this thread because I believe this story

is about another innocent man

falsely accused

just like Lee Oswald.

It follows, then, that this thread will fit in well in the section of the Education Forum devoted to political conspiracy.

Well you are the moderator, Tom

although it beats me

how you ever got to be one.

I promote my own agenda here

which is no secret

but you promote your own agenda

which is a secret

ATTENTION MODERATORS

I protest Mr. Scully's attempt

to move this thread from the JFK forum

where it properly belongs.

I have been a member here

a lot longer than Mr. Scully

SO FORGIVE ME if I note

that Scully

rhymes with BULLY

Edited March 25, 2012 by J. Raymond Carroll

[Michael Hogan]

As I said before don't Y'all admire Hogan the WIDOW-BASHER.

Give it up BILL YOU of all people should know by now that Oswald accusers are the world's biggest bunch OF LOSERS

From The Oswald Affair by Leo Sauvage (p 189):

But above all, with the exception that the rights crying out to be upheld in this case were not the rights of the widow

who had come to accuse her husband

, but those of Lee Harvey Oswald, condemned and executed without trial.

Leo Sauvage. God bless him.

[J. Raymond Carroll]

I POSTED THIS ON THE lANCER FORUM

AND ALSO ON THE McADAMS FORUM.

Ain't it funny that neither Debra Conway

nor Professor McAdams complained

that the Morton exoneration story

is off-topic.

Mr. Scully and Mr. Morrow,

You are in very select company.

[J. Raymond Carroll]

Leo Sauvage. God bless him.

Sauvage, like Mr. Hogan

is a little bit

behind the times

[Len Colby]

Thanks, Ray, for clearing this up. You've started this thread because you believe this story is a political conspiracy story. It follows, then, that this thread will fit in well in the section of the Education Forum devoted to political conspiracy.

I agree that this thread was off topic on the JFK assassination forum, but it wasn’t anymore off topic than Scully’s thread on the death of the associate of the son of a man vaguely connected to the JFK assassination or his ‘Obama the tyrant’ thread. It’s bad enough that we have an administrator who violates a forum when he sees fit but now he has the chutzpah to enforce that very same rule against another member.

[J. Raymond Carroll]

I agree that this thread was off topic on the JFK assassination forum,

Len,

Please explain why you think A false accusation against an innocent man is off-topic

in the case of Lee Oswald.

As you probably know Lee OSwald's widow, like myself

has become convinced of her husband's innocence.

Would you be able to explain your opinion to Marina OR THEIR CHILDREN

Before you respond, please read my last post on the JFK Forum: Rules of Behaviour and other points

Edited March 26, 2012 by J. Raymond Carroll

[Michael Hogan]

As I said before don't Y'all admire Hogan the WIDOW-BASHER.

Give it up BILL YOU of all people should know by now that Oswald accusers are the world's biggest bunch OF LOSERS

From The Oswald Affair by Leo Sauvage (p 189):

But above all, with the exception that the rights crying out to be upheld in this case were not the rights of the widow

who had come to accuse her husband

, but those of Lee Harvey Oswald, condemned and executed without trial.

Leo Sauvage. God bless him.

Sauvage, like Mr. Hogan is a little bit behind the times

Leo Sauvage, God Bless him, was the best of the EARLY CRITICS.

Leo Sauvage was the FIRST AND ONLY advocate Lee Oswald had among the early Warren Commission critics.

[Douglas Caddy]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/25/michael-morton-60-minutes_n_1378773.html

[Len Colby]

I agree that this thread was off topic on the JFK assassination forum,

Len,

Please explain why you think A false accusation against an innocent man is off-topic

in the case of Lee Oswald.

As you probably know Lee OSwald's widow, like myself

has become convinced of her husband's innocence.

Would you be able to explain your opinion to Marina OR THEIR CHILDREN

Before you respond, please read my last post on the JFK Forum: Rules of Behaviour and other points

Ray you posted that on the JFK Assassination Forum, not an Oswald one. Roughly 80,000 people have been murdered in Texas since 1960. Obviously in some cases the wrong person was accused. Other than happening in the same state these cases have nothing in common.

http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/txcrime.htm

[Dawn Meredith]

HOwever I still do not expect true justice. This IS Tx. after all.

Dawn

Greetings Dawn.

Good to hear from you again.

As a student of Charles Sanders Peirce

I believe that truth will emerge in the long run

even in Texas.

I was very pleased by the handling of the subject by 60 Minutes. One thing that struck me however is that I wonder if the attorneys (current) are aware of Williamson County's (prior) practice of not giving defense attorneys the police report UNTIL THE DAY OF TRIAL, commencement of it. Imagine not being able to contact important witnesses because you do not know of their existence. Judge Anderson's attorney was so clearly lying. Of course Anderson had that particular police report and it was not part of whatever the trial atty. got on trial date.

Ray, the truth has already emerged. Now it's gone national. And maybe Judge Anderson will not be re-elected. But there will be no justice.

I am glad you put this on the JFK part as I rarely go to the other sections and would have missed this story. (I often miss 60 Minutes as there is always some damn game on and you never know when the show will begin) So I think you again for posting this as this is a story I have been very interested in for some time now. I used to practice in that county. They don't like it when you set cases for jury trials. It's also a long drive in traffic so, I don't miss going up there.

Dawn

[J. Raymond Carroll]

the widow who had come to accuse her husband,

It seems Hogan the widow-basher

will never give up.

Like the scorpion in the fable

it is his nature.

Anyone who is not of DIMINISHED INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY

watching 60 minutes last Sunday

and who knows anything about the JFK case

must have been struck by the parallel

between the family of Michael Morton

and the family of Lee Oswald.

Morton's son disowned his father, and changed his name

because he trusted the authorities who falsely accused his father,

even though his father was alive and looked him straight in the face

and told his son he was at work when the murder happened.

But it would take a bloody-minded person indeed

to castigate young Morton

the way Hogan has been castigating Marina.

It was not until DNA scientifically exonerated Morton

that his son finally accepted his innocence.

Marina, on the other hand, has long ago come to realize that her husband was innocent

even though the authorities --Warren, Garrison, HSCA -- plus every Tom, Dick and Harry --claims he was guilty

either as a lone assassin or as a conspirator.

But I forget,The Morton case has been declared verboten

on the JFK forum

by SCULLY THE BULLY,

aided and abetted by

Robert Morrow, Len Colby

and apparently by the other moderators and members

who condone the bully by their silence.

Leo Sauvage died too soon

[J. Raymond Carroll]

bump

Edited March 27, 2012 by J. Raymond Carroll
OT - Moved by Tom Scully from "JFK Forum: Rules of Behaviour and other points"

[J. Raymond Carroll]

Ray you posted that on the JFK Assassination Forum, not an Oswald one.

THERE IS NO SEPARATE OSWALD FORUM HERE LEN

AS YOU UNDOUBTEDLY KNOW.

So SCULLY THE BULLY

is not the only one posting GOBBLEDYGOOK

on this forum.

YOU WANT US TO BELIEVE THAT LEE OSWALD

IS NOT RELEVANT ON THE JFK FORUM

I have an idea what Scully'S AGENDA is

exactly what is your agenda.

Edited March 27, 2012 by J. Raymond Carroll