Steve Knight Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 http://bit.ly/LglJjg Written in something of an overly-jocular manner, this "case" doesn't seem to have been reported in MSM, here. Man refuses to pay Council Tax because he disagrees with the government's funding of wars, etc. Arrested. Tried in secret with no representation or jury. Jailed. What's going on?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 (edited) I note that your source is a website run by the "party" of the supposed victim, have you seen any independent confirmation of this? Edited July 3, 2012 by Len Colby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Knight Posted July 6, 2012 Author Share Posted July 6, 2012 (edited) Like I said, there's little about it in the MSM, so one doubts its validity. Even more so with the style it's written in - I think the last time I saw something that propagandised, it was the Tea Smugglers protesting the removal of the tea tax, and thus undercutting their expensive free-enterprise, lauding dumping British Tea into Boston Harbor. Still, there's this examination of the tale... http://fullfact.org/articles/secret_courts_summary_justice_council_tax-27504 EDIT : int he == in the* Edited July 6, 2012 by Steve Knight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 (edited) Secret Tribunals- old hat GOLLY ole England ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weekend Edition May 11-13, 2012 Intolerable Opinions in an Age of Secret Tribunals by JEFFREY ST. CLAIR http://www.counterpu...cret-tribunals/ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo AS to Tea Party I say , "sic semper corporannnis !!" (East India (Transnational) Company). ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Thom Hartmann: Must see! The TRUE story of the Tea Party ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ##################################################### The Real Boston Tea Party was Against the Wal-Mart of the 1770s Submitted by Louise on 15. April 2009 - 7:22 Thom's Blog CNBC Correspondent Rick Santelli called for a “Chicago Tea Party” on Feb 19th in protesting President Obama’s plan to help homeowners in trouble. Santelli’s call was answered by the right-wing group Freedomworks, which funds campaigns promoting big business interests, and is the opposite of what the real Boston Tea Party was. FreedomWorks was funded in 2004 by Dick Army (former Republican House Majority leader & lobbyist); consolidated Citizens for a Sound Economy, funded by the Koch family; and Empower America, a lobbying firm, that had fought against healthcare and minimum-wage efforts while hailing deregulation. Anti-tax "tea party" organizers are delivering one million tea bags to a Washington, D.C., park Wednesday morning – to promote protests across the country by people they say are fed up with high taxes and excess spending. The real Boston Tea Party was a protest against huge corporate tax cuts for the British East India Company, the largest trans-national corporation then in existence. This corporate tax cut threatened to decimate small Colonial businesses by helping the BEIC pull a Wal-Mart against small entrepreneurial tea shops, and individuals began a revolt that kicked-off a series of events that ended in the creation of The United States of America. They covered their faces, massed in the streets, and destroyed the property of a giant global corporation. Declaring an end to global trade run by the East India Company that was destroying local economies, this small, masked minority started a revolution with an act of rebellion later called the Boston Tea Party. That is how I tell the story of the Boston Tea Party, now that I have read a first-person account of it. While striving to understand my nation's struggles against corporations, in a rare book store I came upon a first edition of "Retrospect of the Boston Tea Party with a Memoir of George R.T. Hewes, a Survivor of the Little Band of Patriots Who Drowned the Tea in Boston Harbor in 1773," and I jumped at the chance to buy it. Because the identities of the Boston Tea Party participants were hidden (other than Samuel Adams) and all were sworn to secrecy for the next 50 years, this account is the only first-person account of the event by a participant that exists. As I read, I began to understand the true causes of the American Revolution. I learned that the Boston Tea Party resembled in many ways the growing modern-day protests against transnational corporations and small-town efforts to protect themselves from chain-store retailers or factory farms. The Tea Party's participants thought of themselves as protesters against the actions of the multinational East India Company. Although schoolchildren are usually taught that the American Revolution was a rebellion against “taxation without representation,” akin to modern day conservative taxpayer revolts, in fact what led to the revolution was rage against a transnational corporation that, by the 1760s, dominated trade from China to India to the Caribbean, and controlled nearly all commerce to and from North America, with subsidies and special dispensation from the British crown. Hewes notes: “The [East India] Company received permission to transport tea, free of all duty, from Great Britain to America…” allowing it to wipe out New England–based tea wholesalers and mom-and-pop stores and take over the tea business in all of America. “Hence,” wrote, “it was no longer the small vessels of private merchants, who went to vend tea for their own account in the ports of the colonies, but, on the contrary, ships of an enormous burthen, that transported immense quantities of this commodity ... The colonies were now arrived at the decisive moment when they must cast the dye, and determine their course ... ” A pamphlet was circulated through the colonies called The Alarm and signed by an enigmatic “Rusticus.” One issue made clear the feelings of colonial Americans about England's largest transnational corporation and its behavior around the world: “Their Conduct in Asia, for some Years past, has given simple Proof, how little they regard the Laws of Nations, the Rights, Liberties, or Lives of Men. They have levied War, excited Rebellions, dethroned lawful Princes, and sacrificed Millions for the Sake of Gain. The Revenues of Mighty Kingdoms have entered their Coffers. And these not being sufficient to glut their Avarice, they have, by the most unparalleled Barbarities, Extortions, and Monopolies, stripped the miserable Inhabitants of their Property, and reduced whole Provinces to Indigence and Ruin. Fifteen hundred Thousands, it is said, perished by Famine in one Year, not because the Earth denied its Fruits; but [because] this Company and their Servants engulfed all the Necessaries of Life, and set them at so high a Price that the poor could not purchase them.” After protesters had turned back the Company's ships in Philadelphia and New York, Hewes writes, “In Boston the general voice declared the time was come to face the storm.” The citizens of the colonies were preparing to throw off one of the corporations that for almost 200 years had determined nearly every aspect of their lives through its economic and political power. They were planning to destroy the goods of the world's largest multinational corporation, intimidate its employees, and face down the guns of the government that supported it. The queen's corporation The East India Company's influence had always been pervasive in the colonies. Indeed, it was not the Puritans but the East India Company that founded America. The Puritans traveled to America on ships owned by the East India Company, which had already established the first colony in North America, at Jamestown, in the Company-owned Commonwealth of Virginia, stretching from the Atlantic Ocean to the Mississippi. The commonwealth was named after the “Virgin Queen,” Elizabeth, who had chartered the corporation. Elizabeth was trying to make England a player in the new global trade sparked by the European “discovery” of the Americas. The wealth Spain began extracting from the New World caught the attention of the European powers. In many European countries, particularly Holland and France, consortiums were put together to finance ships to sail the seas. In 1580, Queen Elizabeth became the largest shareholder in The Golden Hind, a ship owned by Sir Francis Drake. The investment worked out well for Queen Elizabeth. There's no record of exactly how much she made when Drake paid her share of the Hind's dividends to her, but it was undoubtedly vast, since Drake himself and the other minor shareholders all received a 5000 percent return on their investment. Plus, because the queen placed a maximum loss to the initial investors of their investment amount only, it was a low-risk investment (for the investors at least—creditors, such as suppliers of provisions for the voyages or wood for the ships, or employees, for example, would be left unpaid if the venture failed, just as in a modern-day corporation). She was endorsing an investment model that led to the modern limited-liability corporation. After making a fortune on Drake's expeditions, Elizabeth started looking for a more permanent arrangement. She authorized a group of 218 London merchants and noblemen to form a corporation. The East India Company was born on December 31, 1600. By the 1760s, the East India Company's power had grown massive and worldwide. However, this rapid expansion, trying to keep ahead of the Dutch trading companies, was a mixed blessing, as the company went deep in debt to support its growth, and by 1770 found itself nearly bankrupt. The company turned to a strategy that multinational corporations follow to this day: They lobbied for laws that would make it easy for them to put their small-business competitors out of business. Most of the members of the British government and royalty (including the king) were stockholders in the East India Company, so it was easy to get laws passed in its interests. Among the Company's biggest and most vexing problems were American colonial entrepreneurs, who ran their own small ships to bring tea and other goods directly into America without routing them through Britain or through the Company. Between 1681 and 1773, a series of laws were passed granting the Company monopoly on tea sold in the American colonies and exempting it from tea taxes. Thus, the Company was able to lower its tea prices to undercut the prices of the local importers and the small tea houses in every town in America. But the colonists were unappreciative of their colonies being used as a profit center for the multinational corporation. Boston's million-dollar tea party And so, Hewes says, on a cold November evening of 1773, the first of the East India Company's ships of tax-free tea arrived. The next morning, a pamphlet was widely circulated calling on patriots to meet at Faneuil Hall to discuss resistance to the East India Company and its tea. “Things thus appeared to be hastening to a disastrous issue. The people of the country arrived in great numbers, the inhabitants of the town assembled. This assembly, on the 16th of December 1773, was the most numerous ever known, there being more than 2000 from the country present,” said Hewes. The group called for a vote on whether to oppose the landing of the tea. The vote was unanimously affirmative, and it is related by one historian of that scene “that a person disguised after the manner of the Indians, who was in the gallery, shouted at this juncture, the cry of war; and that the meeting dissolved in the twinkling of an eye, and the multitude rushed in a mass to Griffin's wharf.” That night, Hewes dressed as an Indian, blackening his face with coal dust, and joined crowds of other men in hacking apart the chests of tea and throwing them into the harbor. In all, the 342 chests of tea—over 90,000 pounds—thrown overboard that night were enough to make 24 million cups of tea and were valued by the East India Company at 9,659 Pounds Sterling or, in today's currency, just over $1 million. In response, the British Parliament immediately passed the Boston Port Act stating that the port of Boston would be closed until the citizens of Boston reimbursed the East India Company for the tea they had destroyed. The colonists refused. A year and a half later, the colonists would again state their defiance of the East India Company and Great Britain by taking on British troops in an armed conflict at Lexington and Concord (the “shots heard 'round the world”) on April 19, 1775. That war—finally triggered by a transnational corporation and its government patrons trying to deny American colonists a fair and competitive local marketplace—would end with independence for the colonies. The revolutionaries had put the East India Company in its place with the Boston Tea Party, and that, they thought, was the end of that. Unfortunately, the Boston Tea Party was not the end; within 150 years, during the so-called Gilded Age, powerful rail, steel, and oil interests would rise up to begin a new form of oligarchy, capturing the newly-formed Republican Party in the 1880s, and have been working to establish a permanent wealthy and ruling class in this country ever since. Edited July 6, 2012 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 Secret Tribunals- old hat GOLLY ole England ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weekend Edition May 11-13, 2012 Intolerable Opinions in an Age of Secret Tribunals by JEFFREY ST. CLAIR http://www.counterpu...cret-tribunals/ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Oh yes it happened over 350 years ago it must still be happening today. Quite influenced byLaDouche Gaal distrusts Brits and Jews. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted July 7, 2012 Share Posted July 7, 2012 (edited) Secret Tribunals- old hat GOLLY ole England ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weekend Edition May 11-13, 2012 Intolerable Opinions in an Age of Secret Tribunals by JEFFREY ST. CLAIR http://www.counterpu...cret-tribunals/ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Oh yes it happened over 350 years ago it must still be happening today. Quite influenced byLaDouche Gaal distrusts Brits and Jews. ############################### I remember you like counterpunch PLEASE DIRECT COMMENTS TO Editorial Alexander Cockburn, editor Jeffrey St. Clair, editor PLEASE TELL THEM THEY ARE JEW HATERS,they might be suprised. ############################################# BTW "sic semper corporannnis !!" (East India (Transnational) Company). Its about being against Transnational Corporations control over governments,not Jews or Brits. Edited July 7, 2012 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Knight Posted July 7, 2012 Author Share Posted July 7, 2012 I'm a Brit, and *I* don't trust us!!! Feel perfectly free to disparage our apathy and gullibility towards politicians and their vested interests, because I do, also! Mind you, I do praise all that is sane we're not quite as bad as the American Republican party. YET. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted July 7, 2012 Share Posted July 7, 2012 Secret Tribunals- old hat GOLLY ole England ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weekend Edition May 11-13, 2012 Intolerable Opinions in an Age of Secret Tribunals by JEFFREY ST. CLAIR http://www.counterpu...cret-tribunals/ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Oh yes it happened over 350 years ago it must still be happening today. Quite influenced byLaDouche Gaal distrusts Brits and Jews. ############################### I remember you like counterpunch PLEASE DIRECT COMMENTS TO Editorial Alexander Cockburn, editor Jeffrey St. Clair, editor PLEASE TELL THEM THEY ARE JEW HATERS,they might be suprised. ############################################# BTW "sic semper corporannnis !!" (East India (Transnational) Company). Its about being against Transnational Corporations control over governments,not Jews or Brits. 1) I never indicated I was especially fond of Counterpunch 2) I never indicated I thought they were anti-Semitic 3) You pretty clearly are distrustful of Brits and Jews, just like LaDouche Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted July 8, 2012 Share Posted July 8, 2012 (edited) Oh yes it happened over 350 years ago it must still be happening today.Quite influenced byLaDouche Gaal distrusts Brits and Jews. END COLBY but you then said I never indicated I thought they ((counterpunch)) were anti-Semitic END COLBY I JUST CUT PASTE TO LINK COUNTERPUNCH YOU ODDLY BROUGHT UP JEWS //GAAL ################################################# I never indicated I was especially fond of Counterpunch END COLBY YOU HAVE MENTIONED MORE THAN ONCE THAT COUNTERPUNCH ARE : LHO LONENUT DID JFK AND 911 NO CONSPIRACY ,TO ME WHEN I HAVE QUOTED THEM. LONENUT/NO 911 CONSPIRACY,ISNT THAT ON YOUR SIDE OF THE FENCE ??????????????????????????????????? ################################################## YOU CONTINUE TO INSIST I AM ANTI-SEMITIC and I SAY I AM NOT START COLBY //You pretty clearly are distrustful of Brits and Jews, just like LaDouche // END COLBY A pejorative comment ?? MODERATORS PLEASE NOTE Edited July 8, 2012 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted July 8, 2012 Share Posted July 8, 2012 (edited) Oh yes it happened over 350 years ago it must still be happening today.Quite influenced byLaDouche Gaal distrusts Brits and Jews. END COLBY but you then said I never indicated I thought they ((counterpunch)) were anti-Semitic END COLBY I JUST CUT PASTE TO LINK COUNTERPUNCH YOU ODDLY BROUGHT UP JEWS //GAAL ################################################# I brought up "Brits and Jews" the article related to the former not the latter, not that I think Counterpunch is anti-British I never indicated I was especially fond of Counterpunch END COLBYYOU HAVE MENTIONED MORE THAN ONCE THAT COUNTERPUNCH ARE : LHO LONENUT DID JFK AND 911 NO CONSPIRACY ,TO ME WHEN I HAVE QUOTED THEM. LONENUT/NO 911 CONSPIRACY,ISNT THAT ON YOUR SIDE OF THE FENCE ??????????????????????????????????? ################################################## I have occasionally cited them re:9/11 but never re:JFK since my views are quite different from theirs on the latter. Occasionally citing a source does not equal 'liking' them. You just cited them do you agree with their views on 9/11 and JFK? YOU CONTINUE TO INSIST I AM ANTI-SEMITIC and I SAY I AM NOT START COLBY //You pretty clearly are distrustful of Brits and Jews, just like LaDouche // END COLBYA pejorative comment ?? MODERATORS PLEASE NOTE Other than perhaps Fetzer no one on this forum so frequently resorts to "pejorative comment(s)" than you do. Did you fail to notice there is a 'Report' button? Edited July 8, 2012 by Len Colby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted July 8, 2012 Share Posted July 8, 2012 (edited) I looked for Iraq and Len Colby outside of this forum and found under his name the below. Len Colby 2 months ago ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- T R U T H T R U M P S T E R R O R I S M -- "I don't know something called International Principles. I vow that I'll burn every Palestinian child (that) will be born in this area. The Palestinian woman and child is more dangerous than the man, because the Palestinian child's existence infers that generations will go on, but the man causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an Israeli civilian and I met a Palestinian I would burn him and I would make him suffer before killing him. With one hit I've killed 750 Palestinians (in Rafah in 1956). I wanted to encourage my soldiers by raping Arabic girls as the Palestinian women is a slave for Jews, and we do whatever we want to her and nobody tells us what we shall do but we tell others what they shall do." --Ariel Sharon, current Prime Minister, In an interview with General Ouze Merham,1956. From hell's heart...I stab at thee ###################################################### Golly now that in a sense is Anti-semitic, . Edited July 8, 2012 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 (edited) I looked for Iraq and Len Colby outside of this forum and found under his name the below. Len Colby 2 months ago ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- T R U T H T R U M P S T E R R O R I S M -- "I don't know something called International Principles. I vow that I'll burn every Palestinian child (that) will be born in this area. The Palestinian woman and child is more dangerous than the man, because the Palestinian child's existence infers that generations will go on, but the man causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an Israeli civilian and I met a Palestinian I would burn him and I would make him suffer before killing him. With one hit I've killed 750 Palestinians (in Rafah in 1956). I wanted to encourage my soldiers by raping Arabic girls as the Palestinian women is a slave for Jews, and we do whatever we want to her and nobody tells us what we shall do but we tell others what they shall do." --Ariel Sharon, current Prime Minister, In an interview with General Ouze Merham,1956. From hell's heart...I stab at thee ###################################################### Golly now that in a sense is Anti-semitic, . You're either an idiot, a xxxx or both, most likely the former. The quoted passage was posted by someone who calls himself " Crickets" my reply to him was "Were you born an asshole or did you become one over time?" https://groups.googl...vc=1&&pli=1 As for the supposed Sharon quote it supposedly is a hoax. http://www.camera.or...766&x_context=2 Don't you tire so consistently being wrong? Why doesn't it occur to you to better check your claims? Edited July 9, 2012 by Len Colby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 (edited) https://groups.googl...cia/yGdzSvIjzpM Oh, Im sorry I got it at an archive site that looked like you wrote it..BUT IF YOU GO TO THE LINK YOU CAN SEE THAT YOUR NAME IS ABOVE WHAT I QUOTED. Your kind words to Cricket ,"Were you born an asshole or did you become one over time?" Your kind words to me,"You're either an idiot, a xxxx or both, most likely the former. " Gee, You say Im the idiot ? ################################### NOW LEN COLBY PLEASE REMOVE YOUR POST # 5 because I didnt mention Jews in my post #4 which you posting against. Edited July 9, 2012 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 https://groups.googl...cia/yGdzSvIjzpM Oh, Im sorry I got it at an archive site that looked like you wrote it..BUT IF YOU GO TO THE LINK YOU CAN SEE THAT YOUR NAME IS ABOVE WHAT I QUOTED. Your kind words to Cricket ,"Were you born an asshole or did you become one over time?" Your kind words to me,"You're either an idiot, a xxxx or both, most likely the former. " Gee, You say Im the idiot ? And I stand by that. There is not connection between how polite a person is and their intelligence. In any case cricket's post was highly offensive, I doubt any reasonable person would deem my response inappropriate. As for my comments to you, the post was very clearly NOT written by me you accused me of making a vile post based on nothing but your incompetence and zeal to find 'dirt' on me. You obviously were trying to find an example of me defending the invasion of Iraq and obviously failed. Keep looking, you'll never find one. Once again you show that your memory is quite faulty but never admit error. ###################################NOW LEN COLBY PLEASE REMOVE YOUR POST # 5 because I didnt mention Jews in my post #4 which you posting against. No, while you didn't in that post you did so in others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 (edited) the post was very clearly NOT written by me you accused me of making //END COLBY NO // Gaal CUT AND PASTE WITH NO CHANGES, LEN COLBY NAME AT TOP OF POST. ================================== Len Colby Sign in to reply May 3 Other recipients: On May 3, 8:14 am, Crickets <> wrote: > http://en.wikipedia....iki/Ghostwriter> wrote: > http://en.wikipedia....iki/Ghostwriter > > Osama bin Laden's last words: "I'M JUST A PATSY! > > Osama bin Laden must NOT have his day in court. > > For the same reason Lee Oswald didn't get a trial and for the same > reason Bruce Ivans didn't get a trial: because they were innocent, > and > also would have implicated the real Jewish media/military CFR > killers. > > If Osama bin Laden had a fair trial, he would have been found NOT- > GUILTY, and escorted to freedom by giant armored cops with machine > gunshttp://tinyurl.com/7csuv4mand would have implicated Rumsfeld and > the Pentagon neocons in false-flag 9-11. > > America's terror patsies MUST be executed without trial - or subjected > to secret kangaroo military trials in Communist Cuba - to protect the > guilty false-flag Communist CFR operatives. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > AT LARGE: Jewish leaders scared to hold terrorist trials in N.Y.http://www.tuscaloos...209629/1215/NE... > By Tommy Stevenson > Published: Sunday, February 7, 2010 at 3:30 a.m. > Last Modified: Saturday, February 6, 2010 at 10:49 p.m. > > What ever happened to the bring em on crowd, who took their cue > from former President George W. Bush s infamous defiance in 2003 > shortly after the fall of Iraq when the question was raised of > retaliation by the forces still hostile to us there? > > They seemed to have morphed into a be afraid, be very afraid caucus > as they push the U.S. Department of Justice to move the trial of > Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four alleged accomplishes for their role > in > the Sept. 11 attacks on New York City and the Pentagon from a federal > courtroom in the Big Apple. > > RED, WHITE AND BLUE? All I see is yellow, yellow, and more yellow. > > Only the GUILTY fear the courtroom and prefer patsy executions > without > trial. Baring that, the perpetrators desire a secret restricted > kangaroo military trial in Cuba at midnight conducted by the same > military personal that dusted the towers with D-E. > > "Equal Justice Under Law" ... kiss it... kiss it... kiss it goodbye. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > It HAD to be Osama bin Laden and 19 other Muslims. > > Because everyone KNOWS that ZOG America doesn't engage in propaganda. > > Osama Bin Lyin? - show quoted text - > Saturday, July 24, 2010 > > Everyone knows that Osama Bin Laden confessed to 9/11 on videotape. > > Admittedly, German experts say (rough English translation here) that > the Bin Laden confession tape was mistranslated. But what do the > Germans know, other than how to make beer? > > Sure, an American computer expert says that a Bin Laden video > released > in 2007 was spliced together from earlier footage, and that: > > "There are so many splices that I cannot help but wonder if someone > spliced words and phrases together. I also cannot rule out a vocal > imitator during the frozen-frame audio. The only way to prove that > the > audio is really bin Laden is to see him talking in the video...." > > But he's just a pencil-neck computer geek, so why should we listen to > him? > > Yeah, Swiss scientists are 95% certain that an early post-9/11 Bin > Laden tape was a fake. They conclude that all of the later Bin Laden > tapes are probably fakes as well. But what do the Swiss know, besides > banking and milk chocolate? > > Okay, one of the world's top experts on Bin Laden - Bruce Lawrence of > Duke University - says that recent Bin Laden tapes are fake. He also > says that the tape in which Bin Laden confessed to 9/11 is a fake, > and > that the top Bin Laden experts in the Department of Homeland Security > agree. But he must be a communist or something. > > And it is interesting that - as confirmed by the Washington Post's > Spy > Talk columnist - the CIA admitted to faking a Bin Laden videotape > using CIA personnel: > > The agency actually did make a video purporting to show Osama bin > Laden and his cronies sitting around a campfire swigging bottles of > liquor and savoring their conquests with boys, one of the former CIA > officers recalled, chuckling at the memory. The actors were drawn > from > some of us darker-skinned employees, he said. > > But that is obviously just an isolated incident which doesn't mean > that any other Bin Laden tapes are fake. > > Because everyone knows that America doesn't engage in propaganda. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > I SHOT THE COLE > > I shot the Cole > But I did not dust the trade center, Oh! No! > I shot the Cole > But I didn't dust the trade center, Oh! No! > > All around in my home town, > Spooks tryin' to track me down; > They say they want to bring me in guilty > For the dusting of the trade center, > For the crime of the W T C > But I say: > > I shot the Cole > But I swear it was in self defense! > I say: I shot the Cole - Oh, Lord! - > And they say it is a capital offence. > > Sheriff Sharon always hated me, > For what, I don't really know: > Every time I planted a seed, > He said kill it before it grows - > He said kill Muslims before they grow. > And so: > > I shot the Cole. Oh, Lord! > But I swear it was in self-defense. > I say: I shot the Cole, > But I swear it was in self defense. Oo-oh Yeah! > > Freedom came my way one day > And I started out of town, > All of a sudden I saw the USS Cole > Aiming to shoot me down, > So I shot - I shot - I shot a hole in the Cole > And I say: If I am guilty I will pay. > > I shot the Cole, > But I did not dust the trade center, Oh! No! > I shot the Cole. I did! > But I didn't dust the trade center. Oh! No! > > Reflexes had got the better of me > And what is to be must be: > Every day the bucket goes down a well, > One day the bottom will drop out, > One day the water will fall back out. > And I say: > > I - I - I shot the Cole > Lord, I did not dust the trade center. HELL NO! > I - I - I shot the Cole, > But I didn't dust no trade center, xxxx You, ZIObama. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > -- T R U T H T R U M P S T E R R O R I S M -- > > "I don't know something called International Principles. I vow that > I'll burn every Palestinian child (that) will be born in this area. > The Palestinian woman and child is more dangerous than the man, > because the Palestinian child's existence infers that generations > will > go on, but the man causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an > Israeli civilian and I met a Palestinian I would burn him and I would > make him suffer before killing him. With one hit I've killed 750 > Palestinians (in Rafah in 1956). I wanted to encourage my soldiers by > raping Arabic girls as the Palestinian women is a slave for Jews, and > we do whatever we want to her and nobody tells us what we shall do > but > we tell others what they shall do." > > --Ariel Sharon, current Prime Minister, In an interview with General > Ouze Merham,1956. > > From hell's heart...I stab at thee > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > > S H A R O N > _ > /'_/) > ,/_ / > / / > /'_'/' '/'__'7, > /'/ / / /"/_\ > ('( ' ' _~/' ') > \ ' / > '\' \ _.7' > \ ( > \ \ > > . H E L L ' S H E A R T > . > . Were you born an asshole or did you become one over time? Edited July 13, 2012 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now