Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy , 911 = Operation Gladio

[Steven Gaal]

President of Italy’s Supreme Court To Refer 9/11 Crimes To International Criminal Court

http://www.globalresearch.ca/president-of-italys-supreme-court-to-refer-911-crimes-to-international-criminal-court/

================================o

Ferdinando Imposimato is the honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy, and former Senior Investigative Judge, Italy.

Imposimato presided over several terrorism-related cases, including the kidnapping and ultimate assassination of President Aldo Moro, the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II, other political assassinations and kidnapping cases and several cases against the Mafia. He is a former Senator who served on the Anti-Mafia Commission in three administrations.

Imposimato is also a former legal consultant to the United Nations regarding institution of laws to control drug trafficking.

This week, Judge Imposimato stated publicly in writing that 9/11 was just like the “strategy of tension” carried out in Italy.

Specifically, the former Italian Prime Minister, Italian judges, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.

As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this)(Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred).

And watch this BBC special:

Judge Imposimato writes that 9/11 was the exact same type of attack: an act of false flag terror.

Judge Imposimato announced that he is going to recommend that the International Criminal Court hold a criminal trial into 9/11.

Imposimato noted that the International Criminal Court was set up to protect the world from criminal acts of war, and that it is the perfect judicial body to hear such a case.

Numerous High-Level Legal Scholars Agree That Additional Action Is Necessary

Imposimato is not the only legal scholar to call for prosecutions and/or further investigations into 9/11. Many other high-level legal jurists, professors and trial lawyers have said the same thing. See this and this.

Note: Judge Imposimato is a member of Lawyers for 9/11 Truth and a panelist on the Toronto Hearings.

===============================================o

Yet Another Congressman Questions 9/11

http://www.globalresearch.ca/yet-another-congressman-questions-9-11/

================================================o

Congressman Jason Chafetz just said that we need to be vigilant and continue to investigate 9/11.

A nutjob, right?

Maybe.

But he joins quite a few other Congressmen:

According to the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham, an FBI informant had hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House(confirmed here)

Current Democratic U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy said “The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush’s watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen?”

Current Republican Congressman Ron Paul calls for a new 9/11 investigationand states that “we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on”

Current Democratic Congressman Dennis Kucinich hints that we aren’t being told the truth about 9/11

Former Democratic Senator Mike Gravel states that he supports a new 9/11 investigation and that we don’t know the truth about 9/11

Former Republican Senator Lincoln Chaffee endorses a new 9/11 investigation

Former U.S. Democratic Congressman Dan Hamburg says that the U.S. government “assisted” in the 9/11 attacks, stating that “I think there was a lot of help from the inside”

Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee Curt Weldon has shown that the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job

And 9/11 Commissioners:

The Commission’s co-chairs said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements (free subscription required)

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says “I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate should continue

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”

9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”

9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .”

And the Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – recently said ”At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened”. He also said ”I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”

And senior intelligence officers:

A number of intelligence officials, including a CIA Operations Officer who co-chaired a CIA multi-agency task force coordinating intelligence efforts among many intelligence and law enforcement agencies (Lynne Larkin) sent a joint letter to Congress expressing their concerns about “serious shortcomings,” “omissions,” and “major flaws” in the 9/11 Commission Report and offering their services for a new investigation (they were ignored)

Former military analyst and famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg recentlysaid that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is “far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers”. He also said that the government is ordering the media to cover up her allegations about 9/11. And he said that some of the claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are credible, that “very serious questions have been raised about what they [u.S. government officials] knew beforehand and how much involvement there might have been”, that engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or psychologically beyond the scope of the current administration, and that there’s enough evidence to justify a new, “hard-hitting” investigation into 9/11 with subpoenas and testimony taken under oath.

A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials (Raymond McGovern) said “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke”, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job.

A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis (William Bill Christison) said “I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. … All three [buildings that were destroyed in the World Trade Center] were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings before 9/11.” (and seethis).

20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer, the second-ranking civilian in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine services case officer (David Steele) stated that “9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war”, and it was probably an inside job (scroll down to Customer Review dated October 7, 2006).

A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called “perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that “the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job

The Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as Senior Analyst from 1966 – 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College from 1986 – 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said “The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup.”

Professor of History and International Relations, University of Maryland. Former Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency, former military attaché in China, with a 21-year career in U.S. Army Intelligence (Major John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army) questions the government’s version of the events of 9/11.

And other government officials:

U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart (General Wesley Clark) said “We’ve never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I’ve seen that for a long time.”

Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Morton Goulder), former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who’s who of liberals and independents) jointly call for a new investigation into 9/11

The Group Director on matters of national security in the U.S. Government Accountability Office said that President Bush did not respond to unprecedented warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive cover-up instead of accepting responsibility

President of the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board, who also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer and as a member of the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review, and who was awarded Distinguished Flying Crosses for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals (Lt. Col. Jeff Latas) is a member of a group which doubts the government’s version of 9/11

Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan (Col. Ronald D. Ray) said that the official story of 9/11 is “the dog that doesn’t hunt”

The former director of the FBI (Louis Freeh) says there was a cover up by the 9/11 Commission

Director of the U.S. “Star Wars” space defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, who was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat missions (Col. Robert Bowman) stated: “If our government had merely [done] nothing, and I say that as an old interceptor pilot—I know the drill, I know what it takes, I know how long it takes, I know what the procedures are, I know what they were, and I know what they’ve changed them to—if our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive. [T]hat is treason!”

If he’s nuts, Congressman Chafetz is in good company. And see this and this

=====================================================o

SEE BACKGROUND

Historical Basis for 911 TRUTH in Video

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19249

[Len Colby]

President of Italy’s Supreme Court To Refer 9/11 Crimes To International Criminal Court

http://www.globalres...criminal-court/

================================o

Ferdinando Imposimato is the honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy, and former Senior Investigative Judge, Italy.

Imposimato, who is in his late 70s, is entitled to his own opinion. He has no specific knowledge of the case the evidence he cites seems to have been culled from truther websites.

Yet Another Congressman Questions 9/11

http://www.globalres...questions-9-11/

================================================o

Congressman Jason Chafetz just said that we need to be vigilant and continue to investigate 9/11.

A nutjob, right?

Maybe.

Statement from Congressman Chaffetz Regarding 9-11:

Feb 18, 2010

"I am not sympathetic to claims that 9-11 was a government conspiracy.

I have never believed the government was in any way complicit or

responsible for those attacks. When asked on February 16 during a

town hall meeting about the need to investigate the attacks, I

answered truthfully that we should always continue to investigate

new information. The 9-11 attacks were the biggest terrorist attacks

in the history of the United States of America. We should always be

asking questions, looking for answers, and learning from that

experience, but I have no reason to believe claims that the government

was responsible for the attacks."

http://chaffetz.house.gov/press-release/statement-congressman-chaffetz-regarding-9-11

But he joins quite a few other Congressmen:

According to the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham, an FBI informant had hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House(confirmed here)

[...]

Yes Graham and others have indicated some aspects of 9/11 warrant further investigation but he like most of the others on the list have never given the slightest indication they believe the attacks were "an inside job" or "allowed to happen" etc.

[Steven Gaal]

never given the slightest indication they believe the attacks were "an inside job" or "allowed to happen" etc. // END COLBY

THE COLBY SACRED NYT HAS SPOKEN ......

INSIDE JOB ????

The Deafness Before the Storm By Kurt Eichenwald

Published: September 10, 2012

IT was perhaps the most famous presidential briefing in history.

On Aug. 6, 2001, President George W. Bush received a classified review of the threats posed by Osama bin Laden and his terrorist network, Al Qaeda. That morning’s “presidential daily brief” — the top-secret document prepared by America’s intelligence agencies — featured the now-infamous heading: “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.” A few weeks later, on 9/11, Al Qaeda accomplished that goal.

On April 10, 2004, the Bush White House declassified that daily brief — and only that daily brief — in response to pressure from the 9/11 Commission, which was investigating the events leading to the attack. Administration officials dismissed the document’s significance, saying that, despite the jaw-dropping headline, it was only an assessment of Al Qaeda’s history, not a warning of the impending attack. While some critics considered that claim absurd, a close reading of the brief showed that the argument had some validity.

That is, unless it was read in conjunction with the daily briefs preceding Aug. 6, the ones the Bush administration would not release. While those documents are still not public, I have read excerpts from many of them, along with other recently declassified records, and come to an inescapable conclusion: the administration’s reaction to what Mr. Bush was told in the weeks before that infamous briefing reflected significantly more negligence than has been disclosed. In other words, the Aug. 6 document, for all of the controversy it provoked, is not nearly as shocking as the briefs that came before it.

http://www.nytimes.c...nings.html?_r=2

Edited September 13, 2012 by Steven Gaal

[Len Colby]

Actually it's an Op-Ed so it does not represent the views of the “Gray Lady” but take a deep breath and read it again Eichenwald does NOT support the LIHOP theory either, “the administration’s reaction to what Mr. Bush was told in the weeks before that infamous briefing reflected significantly more NEGLIGENCE than has been disclosed”

[Steven Gaal]

I brought to the attention of Mr. Colby of a new put option analysis of 911 related stocks. The analysis indicated that there was AT LEAST a hundred to one statistical odds that there was foreknowlege in purchasing these 911 related put options. His refutations was very,very weak. The analysis was done by 3 economists. All he had to say was one one the PHd economists didnt have a speciality in put option analysis. YES BUT HE HAD TO HAVE STATISTICS TO GET HIS PHd in economics. BUT MORE IMPORTANT the other two fellows ,IT WAS THEIR SPECIALITY !! PUT OPTION ANALYSIS. So again and again COLBY (who worships the afore above post mentioned "Gray Lady" aka NYT ) calls for

experience and expertise in various issues. WELL HERE HE HAS experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise ....but now he wont accept it...........

###########################################################

FOREKNOWLEDGE PROVEN, CASE CLOSED

Edited September 14, 2012 by Steven Gaal

[Len Colby]

I brought to the attention of Mr. Colby of a new put option analysis of 911 related stocks. The analysis indicated that there was AT LEAST a hundred to one statistical odds that there was foreknowlege in purchasing these 911 related put options. His refutations was very,very weak. The analysis was done by 3 economists. All he had to say was one one the PHd economists didnt have a speciality in put option analysis. YES BUT HE HAD TO HAVE STATISTICS TO GET HIS PHd in economics. BUT MORE IMPORTANT the other two fellows ,IT WAS THEIR SPECIALITY !! PUT OPTION ANALYSIS. So again and again COLBY (who worships the afore above post mentioned "Gray Lady" aka NYT ) calls for

experience and expertise in various issues. WELL HERE HE HAS experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise ....but now he wont accept it...........

###########################################################

FOREKNOWLEDGE PROVEN, CASE CLOSED

I might reply to your rantababble if I could decipher it, if you translate it to comprehensible English I'll consider replying. Post a link to the supposed put option exchange.

[Steven Gaal]

I might reply to your rantababble if I could decipher it, if you translate it to comprehensible English I'll consider replying. Post a link to the supposed put option exchange. //end COLBY

OF COURSE YOU CANT RECALL IT.

A mental block is either a repression of painful thoughts, or an inability to continue a train of thought, like in the case of writer's block. A similar phenomenon occurs when one cannot solve a problem in mathematics which one would normally consider simple. In the case of writer's block, many find it helpful to take a break and revisit their topic. Another tactic that is used when people with mental blocks are learning new information is repetition. Mental blocks can be caused by physical disabilities or simply a lack of focus. Mental blocks are also often used to describe a temporary inability to recall a name or other information.^[1]

Repression of painful thoughts, CAUSE ALL YOUR 911 work goes down the drain. Really want to find it ??

Cause all you would have to do is search this site for STEVEN GAAL and OPTION.

==========================================================================

Below plain English and not rantababble as you describe. You cant even read the information !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Golly gee ,this is a very good example of mental block. Colby has forgotten how to read.

=====================================================================

I brought to the attention of Mr. Colby of a new put option analysis of 911 related stocks. The analysis indicated that there was AT LEAST a hundred to one statistical odds that there was foreknowlege in purchasing these 911 related put options. His refutations was very,very weak. The analysis was done by 3 economists. All he had to say was one one the PHd economists didnt have a speciality in put option analysis. YES BUT HE HAD TO HAVE STATISTICS TO GET HIS PHd in economics. BUT MORE IMPORTANT the other two fellows , IT WAS THEIR SPECIALITY !! PUT OPTION ANALYSIS was the specialty of the other two economists. So again and again COLBY (who worships the afore above post mentioned "Gray Lady" aka NYT ) calls for

experience and expertise in various issues. WELL HERE HE HAS experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise ....but now he wont accept it...........

###########################################################

FOREKNOWLEDGE PROVEN, CASE CLOSED

Edited September 15, 2012 by Steven Gaal

[Len Colby]

I vaguely remember the exchange but believe you are misrepresenting my refutation, if your recollection is so clear post the link.

[Steven Gaal]

Insight Into The 9/11 Debate: 'Economists Are Scared'

http://www.countercu...chall270412.htm

One of those papers came from two professors and a graduate student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who studied abnormal trading in the S&P 500 index options prior to the 9/11 attacks. [3] Their study came to the conclusion that there was a high probability of insider trading in S&P 500 index options prior to September 11.

What is very interesting about their results is that the underlying reports that were made available to the 9/11 Commission (which we didn't see until later) say that they could not examine the S&P 500 index options because trading in it is too extensive. Now why that becomes interesting is because the 9/11 Commission report had said that they made a wide-ranging study and they found no evidence of any sort of financial irregularities before 9/11, but also said the S&P 500 index options couldn't even be investigated - so the commission is kind of contradicting itself. And more than that, when some did investigate the S&P 500 index options, they find out that in fact it did have abnormal trading before 9/11, with high probability.

The other paper, the third one, is from Professor Marc Chesney and two of his colleagues at the University of Zurich in Switzerland. [4] They are engaged in a long-term project which has been ongoing now for about five years, continually improving their work and it's getting larger and larger. What they do is they look at 14 corporations - five airlines, five banks and four other stocks. They also find that there was insider trading prior to 9/11 in a number of stocks, for example in Boeing and Merrill Lynch.

We can discuss this further, but the basic message now is that there are three studies showing high probability of insider trading prior to 9/11, while there are no reports out there which are showing the opposite. We only have the 9/11 Commission report saying something different.

Also interesting from Chesney's work is this: Michael Ruppert [author of Crossing the Rubicon] made a lot of noise about the enormity of the profits that were made on put options before 9/11 and he also talks about options that were not exercised after 9/11, suggesting that some people were afraid of exercising their options. [5]

But if you look carefully at Chesney's paper, the detail in Chesney's paper indicates that every single put option was exercised by the time of its expiration day. So there wasn't anything left over. And in fact I have learned something along the way: If a put option is in the money on the day of the expiration date, it is automatically exercised. It isn't allowed to just expire.

The other thing that came from Chesney that I wouldn't know otherwise: he is calculating the actual gains from exercising the put options, and you can add up his numbers, and he comes up to about US$15 million just on the put options that he has looked at.

And if you double that in order to kind of add the other put options he didn't examine, it would be $30 million that could have been earned as a result of exercising the put option trades. The point I am making is that, for the put option trades, while important, we are not talking about billions of dollars here. There are other things that happened before and after 9/11 that were worth much more than $30 million.

LS: Am I right that the paper about the S&P 500 Index and the study by Professor Chesney are both not challenged either?

PZ: That's correct.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I might reply to your rantababble if I could decipher it, if you translate it to comprehensible English I'll consider replying. Post a link to the supposed put option exchange. //end COLBY

OF COURSE YOU CANT RECALL IT.

A mental block is either a repression of painful thoughts, or an inability to continue a train of thought, like in the case of writer's block. A similar phenomenon occurs when one cannot solve a problem in mathematics which one would normally consider simple. In the case of writer's block, many find it helpful to take a break and revisit their topic. Another tactic that is used when people with mental blocks are learning new information is repetition. Mental blocks can be caused by physical disabilities or simply a lack of focus. Mental blocks are also often used to describe a temporary inability to recall a name or other information.[1]

Repression of painful thoughts, CAUSE ALL YOUR 911 work goes down the drain. Really want to find it ??

Cause all you would have to do is search this site for STEVEN GAAL and OPTION.

COLBY WONT ACCEPT THIS FOREKNOWLEDGE SCIENTIFIC DATUM.

I brought to the attention of Mr. Colby of a new put option analysis of 911 related stocks. The analysis indicated that there was AT LEAST a hundred to one statistical odds that there was foreknowlege in purchasing these 911 related put options. His refutations was very,very weak. The analysis was done by 3 economists. All he had to say was one one the PHd economists didnt have a speciality in put option analysis. YES BUT HE HAD TO HAVE STATISTICS TO GET HIS PHd in economics. BUT MORE IMPORTANT the other two fellows , IT WAS THEIR SPECIALITY !! PUT OPTION ANALYSIS was the specialty of the other two economists. So again and again COLBY (who worships the afore above post mentioned "Gray Lady" aka NYT ) calls for

experience and expertise in various issues. WELL HERE HE HAS experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise experience and expertise ....but now he wont accept it...........

#######################################

FOREKNOWLEDGE PROVEN, CASE CLOSED

Edited September 16, 2012 by Steven Gaal

[Len Colby]

According to your own source, the studies found "high probability of insider trading" but you some how convert that into "case closed" your certainty is as misplaced as Posner's.

AFAICT all the cited studies depended on statistical analysis of the odds without taking into consideration unrelated factors that could have caused the higher than normal purchases of the puts. There were however reasons for people to suspect UA's and AA's share prices would fall.

http://911myths.com/index.php/Put_Options

[Steven Gaal]

More than a hundred to one that 911 related put options done with foreknowlege. (see post # 9 above)

Colby's own source stated," Conclusion

We cannot prove that the pre-9/11 put options weren't made with foreknowledge of the attacks."

===========================================

Historical Basis for 911 TRUTH in Video

http://educationforu...showtopic=19249

============================================

The Deafness Before the Storm By Kurt Eichenwald

http://www.nytimes.c...nings.html?_r=2

============================================

Two-hour special with Webster Tarpley: "46 Drills of 9/11"

http://curezone.com/...m.asp?i=1851904

-------- if you dont want two hours try 59 video minutes below

The 46 Drills of 9/11 by Webster Tarpley (article with table list of drills)

http://coto2.wordpre...ebster-tarpley/

--------

Video Webster Tarpley on the 46 Drills of 9/11

##############################################

The weight of the evidence proclaims inside job. Case Closed

-------------------------------------o-------------------------------------------

Edited September 16, 2012 by Steven Gaal

[Len Colby]

More than a hundred to one that 911 related put options done with foreknowlege. (see post # 9 above)

You keeo repeating that but have yet to provide a citation, it's not in the link you possted.

Colby's own source stated," Conclusion

We cannot prove that the pre-9/11 put options weren't made with foreknowledge of the attacks."

===========================================

No, it can't be proven but is unlikely.

Historical Basis for 911 TRUTH in Video

http://educationforu...showtopic=19249

============================================

Not directly relevant.

The Deafness Before the Storm By Kurt Eichenwald

http://www.nytimes.c...nings.html?_r=2

============================================

Not evidence of foreknowledge. Even he said it was "negligence"

Two-hour special with Webster Tarpley: "46 Drills of 9/11"

http://curezone.com/...m.asp?i=1851904

-------- if you dont want two hours try 59 video minutes below

The 46 Drills of 9/11 by Webster Tarpley (article with table list of drills)

http://coto2.wordpre...ebster-tarpley/

--------

Video Webster Tarpley on the 46 Drills of 9/11

Tarpley blew his credibility over the Kennabunkport Warning scam. he failed to show any of the drills (many of which were NOT on 9/11) added or demonstrated foreknowledge of the attacks.

##############################################

The weight of the evidence proclaims inside job. Case Closed

-------------------------------------o-------------------------------------------

[Steven Gaal]

Operation Gladio and 9/11 - Daniele Ganser On Resistance Radio.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AajcK6DXI2g

Tod Fletcher talks to historian Daniele Ganser, an expert on Operation Gladio, the secret campaign by the CIA, MI6, NATO and national military secret services to control European politics by terrorist attacks, forerunners of 9/11. Swiss historian and peace researcher Daniele Ganser, Ph.D. is the author of Nato's Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe (Frank Cass, 2005).

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

WAR GAMES OCCURING ON 9/11

1. FBI training exercise in Monterey, California for FBI/CIA Anti-Terrorist Task Force: Diverts top FBI, CIA anti-terrorist and special operations agents and heavy equipment away from Boston, NYC, Washington DC

2. NORAD annual readiness drill, Cheyenne Mountain, CO (Vigilant Guardian): Full ‘battle staff’ levels to test entire organization (Note well: big coincidence and huge irony that all of NORAD is involved in a "readiness drill")

3 Vigilant Guardian: NORAD, NEADS, USCanada: Live-fly hijacking and air defense; hijack multiplication, diversion and confusion

4 NORAD/JCS Vigilant Warrior: Reported by Richard Clarke

5 Operation Southern Watch: Diverts 174th Fighter Wing, New York Air National Guard, to Sultan Air Base, Saudi Arabia, to impose no-fly zone over southern Iraq

6 Operation Northern Watch: Diverts 6 fighters from Langley AFB sent to Incirlik AFB, Turkey to impose no-fly zone over northern Iraq

7 Operation Northern Vigilance: Diverts fighters, 350 personnel to Alaska and northern Canada to counter a Russian bomber drill

8 Operation Northern Guardian: Keflavik AFB, Iceland - Diverts fighters from Langley Air Force Base (Virginia) deployed to Keflavik AFB, Iceland to counter a Russian bomber drill

9 Red Flag, Nellis AFB, Nevada: Diverts most F-15s of 71st Fighter Squadron (100 pilots), Langley AFB, VA; DC ANG’s 121st Fighter Squadron of Andrews Air Force Base also depleted.

10. Andrews AFB local drill: Diverts 3 F-16s to North Carolina

11 National Reconnaissance Office drill, Chantilly,Virginia: Simulated plane crash into high-rise government building; satellite imaging (WTC attack)

12 Tripod II, New York City: Response to biochemical attack; run from backup command center at Pier 92, Hudson River.

[Len Colby]

I guess this will come as a surprise to Mr. Tarpley (and Mr. Gaal) but not all of the USAF sits around all day waiting to be called into action. Some actually go on missions and participate in training and drills. But this is irrelevant to what transpired on 9/11. It was up to the fighters on 'scramble alert' to carry out intercepts the normal contingent was on duty that day, 2 fighters/pilots each at 7 bases in the 'lower 48'. Odd that he thinks having more personnel than normal at NORAD HQ somehow furthered the 'inside job'.

[Steven Gaal]

You keeo repeating that but have yet to provide a citation, it's not in the link you possted. // END COLBY

===============================

xxxx xxxx PANTS ON FIRE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ALL CITATIONS GIVEN AT LINK POST #9 (SHOWN BELOW)

POST #9

Insight Into The 9/11 Debate: 'Economists Are Scared'

http://www.countercu...chall270412.htm

==========================================

Volume 15, Numbers 1 & 2

March / June 2011

Quarterly publication of the Multinational Finance Society, a non-profit corporation ISSN 1096-1879

Abnormal Trading in the S&P 500 Index Options Prior to the September 11 Attacks?

(Multinational Finance Journal, 2011, vol. 15, no. 1/2, pp. 1-46)

Wing-Keung Wong

Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong

http://www.mfsociety.org/page.php?pageID=111

Howard E. Thompson

University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA

Kweehong Teh

National University of Singapore, Singapore

After the September 11 attacks, several major newswires reported that there were insiders who tried to profiteer from the options market in anticipation of the event. We use the Student's t-statistics and several non-parametric statistics to test whether there was abnormal trading in S&P 500 (SPX) index options prior to the September 11 attacks. Our findings from the out-of-the-money (OTM), at-the-money (ATM) and in-the-money (ITM) SPX index put options and ITM SPX index call options lead us to reject the null hypothesis that there was no abnormal trading in these contracts prior to the September 11 attacks. We also find evidence consistent with three bearish speculation strategies, namely the Put Purchase strategy, the Put Bear Spread strategy, and the Naked ITM Call Write strategy. In addition, we conclude that there is evidence of abnormal trading in the September 2001 OTM, ATM and ITM SPX index put options immediately after the 9-11 attacks. We also employ the CBOE VIX to confirm the conclusion drawn from the call and put options. This, in turn, is consistent with insiders anticipating the 9-11 attacks.

Keywords: 9-11 attacks, put options, call options, SPX index, Student's t-statistics, non-parametric statistics.

Click here to download the full article (pdf version) (link for pdf go to http above)

#############################################################

Marc Chesney, Remo Crameri and Loriano Mancini: "Detecting Informed Trading Activities in the Option Markets", University of Zurich, April 2010,

http://www.bf.uzh.ch/publikationen/pdf/publ_2098.pdf

################################################################

Allen M Poteshman: "Unusual Option Market Activity and the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001," published in The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, 2006, Vol. 79, Edition 4, page 1703-1726.

http://www.milkingtheherd.com/images/Poteshman%20911%20Insider%20Trading%20Paper.pdf

##################################################################

Paul Zarembka:, "Evidence of Insider Trading before September 11th Re-examined", International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001, September 8-11, 2011, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada,

http://ithp.org/articles/septemberinsidertrading.html

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

ODE TO COLBY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WSkv_29Rncg