Steven Gaal Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 (edited) The ONI files actually existed, but were admittedly destroyed. (incorrect, never admitted they existed,gaal) [2] Steel, Robert D. Oral History interview transcript w/Steel. (Attached) Steel recently reaffirmed the contents of the letter – that he personally knew both Arthur C. Sullivan, who he identified as the head of the Dallas ONI office, as well as Dallas detective Paul Bentley, and that his agency, the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), did indeed have “quite a file on Oswald.” ------------- Oswald’s ONI File The Warren Report mentioned that “….the Commission has reviewed the complete files on Oswald, as they existed at the time of the assassination, of the Department of State, the Office of Naval Intelligence, the FBI and the CIA.” Using that reference, Paul Hoch requested and acquired a 300 page ONI file in 1967, which he says is definitely not one of the USMC files the The Warren Commission published (two USMC files, personnel and medical, as the Folsom and Donabedian Exhibits.), but that it did include a reference to Oswald’s Soviet Embassy visit in Mexico and: “Information presently available to the Office of Naval Intelligence does not indicate what significance, if any, this contact may have represented, and no other information on OSWALD was received until 22 November 1963.” It also included the Taylor memo to McDonald about Patterson, which establishes the fact that Admiral Taylor, the director of ONI, took a keen interest in the ONI affairs in Dallas immediately after the assassination, and suspected an association between Oswald and Ruby. http://archive.politicalassassinations.net/2013/02/oswalds-oni-records-revisited/ The ONI files actually existed, but were admittedly destroyed. (incorrect, never admitted they existed,gaal) The official position of ONI is that the 8 feet of files reported by a ONI whistleblower that researcher Bill Kelly wrote an article on ,never existed.,gaal ============================================= As to ONI-DMV man Robert D. Steel , he is just reporting a office story myth that grew and took a life on its own...right ??? , gaal Naval Intelligence (ONI), did indeed have “quite a file on Oswald.// Golly Mr. Parker = >> HOW YOU SAY IT + PRODUCE THE FILE, CANT ? then it never existed. ,gaal ================== It also included the Taylor memo to McDonald about Patterson, which establishes the fact that Admiral Taylor, the director of ONI, took a keen interest in the ONI affairs in Dallas immediately after the assassination, and suspected an association between Oswald and Ruby. http://archive.politicalassassinations.net/2013/02/oswalds-oni-records-revisited/ MAYBE BECAUSE THE TSBD was a ONI gun running operation done at the behest of the State Department, as I have previously posted, gaal Edited July 18, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 Okay! Thanks Steve! That answers my previous question. You ARE self-basting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 (edited) As a well-paid disinfo agent, I fully endorse both your work on the ONI issues and your new avatar. // Parker ======================================================================================= serving up the nutritious truth ,gaal ========================================= ================== It also included the Taylor memo to McDonald about Patterson, which establishes the fact that Admiral Taylor, the director of ONI, took a keen interest in the ONI affairs in Dallas immediately after the assassination, and suspected an association between Oswald and Ruby. http://archive.polit...ords-revisited/ MAYBE BECAUSE THE TSBD was a ONI gun running operation done at the behest of the State Department, as I have previously posted, gaal =========================== see post # 1063 above === In 1930, Clarence Karcher and Eugene McDermott founded Geophysical Service. It became the Geophysical Service Inc. (GSI) with the formation of the oil company Coronado Corp in 1939. During the Second World War, the GSI expanded and started producing electronics for the U.S. Army and U.S. Navy. In 1951, the company was once again reorganized and named General Instruments. Later on, in the same year the name was changed to Texas Instruments and GSI became a subsidiary of the new company. In the 1950s, under a secret government contract, the TI-GSI monitored the Soviet Union’s underground nuclear weapons testing from Oklahoma. Texas Instruments entered the defense electronics market manufacturing equipment for the seismic industry using technology previously developed for the oil industry. (Navy-Texas Instrument connection) =================== Defense business begins work on submarine-detection equipment (Navy-Texas Instrument connection) http://www.ti.com/corp/docs/company/history/timeline/defense/1940/docs/42-defense_business.htm There exists a Texas Instruments Ruby connection see http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19854&p=264910 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ITS A CIA/SHOOTING TEAM USING THE ONI/TSBD PLATFORM. The shooting out of the TSBD is a classic example of covert operation compartmentalization. Edited July 18, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Tracy Parnell Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 David, Nice try to divert attention from the fact Armstrong has admitted his misrepresentation of the facts in the Landesberg matter. First, my current work is the debunking of things like Harvey & Lee. I am a watchdog. I may be getting into general areas of the assassination at some point if I choose to do so. Right now, I have my hands full with Armstrong. Several of the people you listed are respected researchers. You may disagree with them but that does not diminish their contributions. You try and diminish the HSCA's work when it goes against your theory but Armstrong uses them in his book dozens of times. I'm here, I'm not going anywhere, and I'll work on what I choose to. Now lets talk about you-when are you going out on your own so you don't have to continue defending the indefensible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Josephs Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 Now lets talk about you-when are you going out on your own so you don't have to continue defending the indefensible? So says the man who has yet to step to the plate and offer his defense for the WCR fiasco.... talk about indefensible. As for your self proclaimed "Watch dog" status... I guess everyone needs a hobby... set the world on fire. No diversion Tracy... you think you accomplished something - bravo... you want a gold star or something? Take a few minutes and address the evidence the USMC offers along with the DoD which proves not only did they lie about it, but that there are Oswalds at Ping Tung and Atsugi simultaneously... http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19762&page=71#entry309157 you seem to be the only one of the group who actually does some work to support your conclusions... ...Can you disprove the USMC evidence regarding his being at Ping Tung or on a ship to and from in Sept/Oct 1957 while also in Atsugi? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Tracy Parnell Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 Take a few minutes and address the evidence the USMC offers along with the DoD which proves not only did they lie about it, but that there are Oswalds at Ping Tung and Atsugi simultaneously... http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19762&page=71#entry309157 you seem to be the only one of the group who actually does some work to support your conclusions... ...Can you disprove the USMC evidence regarding his being at Ping Tung or on a ship to and from in Sept/Oct 1957 while also in Atsugi? I might look into that at some point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 (edited) The ONI files actually existed, but were admittedly destroyed. (incorrect, never admitted they existed,gaal) [2] Steel, Robert D. Oral History interview transcript w/Steel. (Attached) Steel recently reaffirmed the contents of the letter – that he personally knew both Arthur C. Sullivan, who he identified as the head of the Dallas ONI office, as well as Dallas detective Paul Bentley, and that his agency, the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), did indeed have “quite a file on Oswald.” [...] http://archive.politicalassassinations.net/2013/02/oswalds-oni-records-revisited/ I'm the guy who interviewed Lt. Cmdr. Robert D. Steel twice (the second time on tape) in La Jolla, California, a couple of years ago. The problem is I stupidly sent that tape to Bill Kelley without having made a copy of it for myself to keep. In the unrecorded conversation I had with Steel (before one of my friends gave me a tape recorder), Steel said that Paul Bentley was a friend of his, but in the taped version he kind of shied away from that. During the taped interview, Steel said that the Dallas ONI office was "across the street", "It was in the Postal building," "It was in the building that Kennedy was killed from." The last time I checked Kelley's "transcript" of the tape, that part was missing. Steel also confirmed to me that he was "absolutely sure" that what he had written to Bentley on 11/24/63 about the ONI's having "quite a file on Oswald" before the assassination was correct. Bill Kelley promised me twice, on two different occasions, to return the tape to me or to send me a good copy of it, but has refused to do so. The most recent time he promised to send it to me was in a thread on this forum. I'm believe that Bill Kelley may have slightly edited and / or embellished my interview of Cmdr. Steel and I believe that may be the reason he refuses to return the tape, or a good unedited copy of it, to me. --Tommy [ The following is from the PM I sent to Greg Burnham back in February, 2013. Bill Kelley had sent me his "transcript" of my tape. Some parts of the tape were hard to understand, so there were a few "omissions" and "mistakes" in Bill's tanscript. He also seemed to have decided to leave out an important part. I made corrections to the transcript from memory and sent the following "corrected transcript" back to him, but as far as I know he hasn't updated his transcript.] Oral History Interview with Robert D. Steel, La Jolla, California. February 1, 2013. (With my corrections and comments in green.) [bill, This didn't even make it onto the tape because I started talking too soon after starting the tape recorder -- "My name is Thomas Graves and this morning..."] ...I'm interviewing Commander Robert D. Steel, US Navy Reserves, Retired, in La Jolla, California, as an oral history project for the Baylor University Library, JFK Section. Steel’s wife Judy is sitting in as an observer during this interview. Good morning Commander Steel. [Close but not exact, Bill. I think I said “...for the Baylor University Oral History Institute”. Maybe you could listen to it again? Thanks.] Robert D. Steel: Good morning. Question: What is your full name sir? RDS: Robert David Steel. Q: When and where were you born? RDS: May, M-A-Y Texas, that’s in the central part of the state…. Q: And when were you born? RDS: May 26, 1919 Q: When did you join the Navy? RDS: I graduated from the University of ….. State [sam Houston State] in ….[Huntsville?] Texas, then I went to Northwestern University midshipman school in Chicago in January 1942 and graduated in May, 1942. I came out to the West Coast, I was in charge of training of Midshipman who were on two weeks of training duty at San Piedro, Naval section from the University of Southern California, followed by … Midshipman from UCLA. Q: Did you serve on any ships during World War II? RDS: I would consider the Sea Scout a ship. Q: So you served on the Sea Scout? RDS: I was the commanding officer. Q: I've read about the Sea Scout, that was a sonar training ship, wasn’t it? RDS: Yes it was. Q: Okay. Did you serve on any other ships during World War II? RDS: Yes I did, for the last two years of the war I was on board the USS [OSTERHAUS], a destroyer escort. Q: Were you an officer on that ship? RDS: Yes, I was number three officer, a first lieutenant in charge of everything above the waterline. Q: What did you do after the war? RDS: I first worked for the Internal Revenue Service as a tax collector. Q: In San Diego? RDS: Collecting from business men in San Diego, and following that Naval Intelligence, I came to work for them as a special agent. Q: What year did you leave active duty and join the Naval Reserves. RDS: I suppose that would be 1945. Q: And what year did you join ONI? RDS: 1948. Q: How many years did you work for ONI? RDS: As a special agent 22 years. Q: Did you work for ONI in any other capacity other than special agent? RDS: Yes, I was a commanding officer of the Reserve officers throughout the area. Q: What years would that have been? RDS: That was for a two year period and I had to work my way up to that position, and I retired from that around 1962. Q: When you were working as a special agent were you technically a civilian agent? RDS: Yes sir, but I wore two hats, being a Reserve officer I was also doing Reserve duty from time to time with various other agencies – CIA, FBI and other military services in Washington DC mainly. Q: Did you serve as liaison with CIA and FBI so to speak? RDS: I wouldn’t call it liaison, I was indoctrinated into their activities. Q: Did you work for the same branch or department of ONI while you were a special agent all those years? RDS: Would you repeat the question? Q: I am a little bit unfamiliar with the structure of ONI. I believe there was a special branch – the Naval Investigative Service, did you work for that branch for 22 years as a special agent? RDS: Yes. Q: Did your work at ONI involve liaison with any other government agencies? RDS: (Laughs) Yes. Q: With CIA and FBI for example? RDS: Yes. Q: In which naval district were you stationed in late 1959 and early 1960? RDS: Would you repeat that? Q: In which naval district were you stationed in late 1959-60? RDS: My headquarters were always in this naval district. Q: That would include San Diego? RDS: San Diego and all the area that included Arizona and New Mexico. Q: Who was your boss 1959-1963? RDS: Who was my boss? I had many. Q: Did you know Fred Reeves? RDS: (Laugh) A very good close friend. Q: Was he the head of the San Diego ONI office? RDS: For a brief period. Q: Do you remember roughly when? RDS: No I’m sorry I can’t recall. Q: Was he ever your boss. RDS: Very briefly. We were mainly co-workers. Q: When did you start living in San Diego? RDS: Ten, [IN] 1942. Q: Where was your office in San Diego? RDS: Headquarters building was at Broadway Pier. Q: Who were your closest colleagues in San Diego? RDS: ONI or other law enforcement agencies? Q: I was thinking ONI. RDS: I had dozens, I mean, its best to be good to everybody. Q: Do you know what a “119 Report” was? RDS: Yes sir. Q: Did you ever write any 119 Reports on anyone while you were with ONI? RDS: Hundreds of them. Q: Did you have anyone working under you in 1959. RDS: Yes. Q: Is it fair to say that you did as well in 1963? RDS: Repeat? Q: Did you have anyone working under you in 1963? RDS: Its hard to say working under me, we worked as a team. There were people in certain positions who were less qualified as myself, so we worked as a team because somebody had to fill certain billets, somebody had to sit by at a desk because they were incapable of doing certain things. Q: Let me put it this way, were you anybody’s boss in 1963? RDS: We worked as team, they were co-workers. Q: Okay. Fred Reeves told the Assassinations Records Review Board that a week or so after Lee Harvey Oswald defected to the USSR, Reeves had been called by two ONI officers in Washington DC and was asked to do a background investigation on Oswald at El Toro, Marine Air Station, Oswald’s last duty station before leaving the Marine Corps. Is it possible you did this investigation for Reeves and Reeves took credit for it? RDS: Yes. Q: Would you say it is possible or would you say it is probable? RDS: Probable. Q: Is it fair to say you were you probably were sent in to do this investigation of Oswald because you were a more highly skilled experienced investigator than the ONI people stationed at El Toro who were used to doing more mundane investigation? RDS: Yes. Q: Do you remember doing this investigation for Reeves at El Toro? RDS: [Yes,] but not very well. Q: Given that Oswald was stationed at El Toro and had just defected, I’d like to ask you some hypothetical questions. Would have done it by yourself or with other special agents? RDS: (BK wrote "unintelligible" here) [He said, "BY MYSELF" or "ALONE" or words to that effect] Q: Okay. Would you have questioned Oswald’s former colleagues at El Toro? RDS: Yes. Q: Would you have had a stenographer with you? RDS: No. Q: Would you have introduced yourself to these marines you were questioning? RDS: Yes. Q: Do you remember the name Nelson Delgado at El Toro? RDS: Not the name, could you tell me his position? Q: He was a marine like Oswald and a friend of Oswald, not an officer, an enlisted man. RDS: No I don’t remember. Q: Okay. Going back to Reeves and the ARRB Final Report, Reeves said he went to El Toro Marine Air Station, copied Oswald’s enlisted personnel files, talked to Oswald’s associates and mailed this to ONI in Washington D.C. Reeves said that ONI in Washington DC ran the post defection investigation of Oswald and the Washington officers then directed various agents in the field. Reeves said he did not interview anyone himself but that later, late 1959 or early 1960, there were approximately twelve to fifteen ONI "119" Reports that crossed his desk. Reeves said he was aware of some of the "119" Reports from Japan and Texas and that the primary concern of the reports he read on Oswald was to ascertain what damage to national security Oswald’s defection to the USSR had caused. Is it possible that you wrote any of the "119" Reports on Oswald that crossed Reeves’ desk? RDS: Yes. Q: Do you remember writing any of them? RDS: No. Q: Okay, shifting gears a little bit here, was Detective Paul Bentley of the Dallas Police Department a friend of yours? RDS: An acquaintance. [Note: this is a little different from his answer a week earlier when I didn't have a tape recorder with me. At that time he said that PB was a “friend.” Hmmm. Interesting.] Q: How did you know him? RDS: I’m not sure, but I think he was a polygraph examiner. Q: Did you ever work with him? RDS: [i think we were in the Navy together.] [bK wrote "Unintelligible"] Q: Now, you wrote a letter to Paul Bentley on November 24, 1963, two days after Oswald was arrested in Dallas, and in the letter you say that quote “ONI had quite a file on Oswald,” and in the letter you also said that A. C. Sullivan of the ONI office could provide Bentley with this file. Did you send this letter before or after Jack Ruby shot Oswald that day? RDS: Did I send the letter before….? Q: It’s an historical fact that Jack Ruby shot Oswald on the 24th of November, 1963 and the letter you sent Bentley was dated the same day, so I am wondering if you sent it before or after Ruby shot Oswald? RDS: I’m sure it was after. Q: How did you know that ONI had quote “quite a file on Oswald” at that time? RDS: (Long pause) I don’t know. Q: Did you see it? RDS: Did I see it? Q: Did you see the ONI file on Oswald? RDS: I may have written the God damn thing!! Q: (Pause) Okay. Was A.C. Sullivan of Dallas a friend of yours. RDS: A very close friend. Q: How did you come to know him? RDS: He was in the same business I was in. He had been a guest at my home. I had been a guest at his home. Q: Now, was he the head of the Dallas ONI office? RDS: Yes he was. Q: Did Sullivan know about the ONI file on Oswald? RDS: Of course. Q: Did A.C. Sullivan already have the file on Nov. 24, 1963? RDS: Undoubtedly. Q: Did you ever speak with Sullivan about Oswald’s ONI file? RDS: Yes. Q: Looking back at it, how sure are you that your statement in the letter that ONI had "quite a file on Oswald" was accurate -- "absolutely sure," "very sure," or "less sure now than when I wrote the letter"? A: [BK has a blank here.] [steel said, "ABSOLUTELY SURE"] (I remember being surprised by his answer because I was expecting him to say, "Not as sure now as I was when I wrote the letter.") Q: Does the letter today bring back any [OTHER?] memories? (I read to him, "Dear Paul, Perhaps you are aware ONI has quite a file on Oswald…..") RDS: No. Q: Did you ever write to or discuss with anyone else Oswald’s ONI file? RDS: I don’t think so, other than A.C. Sullivan. Q: Did you ever have occasion to visit the Dallas ONI office? RDS: Yes, a number of times. Q: Where was it located? RDS: It was in the Post Office building, it was across the street, it was the building from which Kennedy was killed. Q: The assassination happened in Dealey Plaza, and there was a Post Office building on the other side. [You may want to listen to that part again, Bill...] RDS: Yes. Q: Did the Dallas ONI do general ONI work or did it specialize in certain things? RDS: General. Q: Did you know other law enforcement or intelligence people in the Dallas area? RDS: Yes. Q: Did you know J. Mason Langford, of Ft. Worth, he was head of security for General Dynamics or Convair and later became fire martial of the county. RDS: I don’t recall him. Q: Did you know I.P. Hale or Max Clark? RDS: Both names sound familiar but I don’t recall right now. Q: Did you know Pat Gannaway, of the Dallas Police Special Services Bureau? RDS: I just don’t remember. Q: Did you know Jack Revell, the head of the Dallas Criminal Section of the SSB? RDS: These names are all familiar but I don’t recall them. Q: Did you know Colonel Robert E. Jones of 112 Army Intel Group at Fort Sam Houston? RDS: I don’t recall. Q: James Powell, an Army Intelligence agent of the 112th? RDS: The name is familiar but I don’t recall. Q: Had you heard of Lee Harvey Oswald or Harvey Lee Oswald before the assassination? RDS: Yes, it's possible that I knew him very, very well. Q: On some documents the name is transposed – Harvey Lee Oswald. RDS: That is a common occurrence and I never paid much attention to it. Q: You said there’s a good chance you know [KNEW] Oswald quite well before the assassination? RDS: Quite possibly. Q: How would you have possibly known about Oswald quite well before the assassination? RDS: Because I may have investigated the guy. Q: Do you remember investigating him? RDS: Vaguely. Q: What is your personal opinion of ONI and Oswald? RDS: ONI was a wonderful organization. As for Oswald, he was a sick man. Q: What is your personal opinion of the causes of the assassination? RDS: Oswald was just sick out of his mind. Q: Do you think he killed Kennedy by himself? RDS: Yes. Q: Where were you when you heard Kennedy was shot? RDS: I don’t know. [During the previous week's unrecorded interview, he said after a pause, “I don't remember.” But it's fascinating that he DID remember during that unrecorded interview how long the USS Sea Scout was (plus-or-minus one foot according, to the Internet -- he even got the "half foot" right) and where he was when he heard that Pearl Harbor had been attacked!] Q: When you heard that Oswald had been arrested, did his name sound familiar to you? RDS: Yes. Q: Is there anything else you want to say about Oswald, ONI and the assassination? RDS: No. Q: Thank you for letting me interview you today, Commander Steel. (Corrected from recent memory at-that-time by Thomas Graves on 2/21/13) Edited July 21, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 (edited) The following is an excerpt from my post, above, tending to indicate that what Greg said earlier was partially correct -- That a large ONI file on Oswald did admittedly exist before the assassination. I don't know of anyone's admitting that this large file was destroyed, however. Somebody please prove me wrong as that would be fascinating. My Question: Looking back at it, how sure are you that your statement in the letter that ONI had "quite a file on Oswald" was accurate -- "absolutely sure," "very sure," or "less sure now than when I wrote the letter"?Cmdr. Steel's Answer: [BK had a blank here.]My February 2013 correction to BK: "He [Lt. Cmdr. Robert D. Steel, USN Reserves, Retired] said, 'ABSOLUTELY SURE!' It's on the tape, Bill!!! (I remember being surprised by Steel's answer because I was expecting him to say, "Not as sure now as I was when I wrote the letter.") --Tommy Edited July 19, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 The following is an excerpt from my post, above, tending to indicate that what Greg said earlier was partially correct -- That a large ONI file on Oswald did admittedly exist before the assassination. I don't know of anyone's admitting that this large file was destroyed, however. Somebody please prove me wrong as that would be fascinating. My Question: Looking back at it, how sure are you that your statement in the letter that ONI had "quite a file on Oswald" was accurate -- "absolutely sure," "very sure," or "less sure now than when I wrote the letter"? Cmdr. Steel's Answer: [BK had a blank here.] My February 2013 correction to BK: "He [Lt. Cmdr. Robert D. Steel, USN Reserves, Retired] said, 'ABSOLUTELY SURE!' It's on the tape, Bill!!! (I remember being surprised by Steel's answer because I was expecting him to say, "Not as sure now as I was when I wrote the letter.") --Tommy Tommy, Steel's admission that a file existed is ipso facto, an admission that it was destroyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 The following is an excerpt from my post, above, tending to indicate that what Greg said earlier was partially correct -- That a large ONI file on Oswald did admittedly exist before the assassination. I don't know of anyone's admitting that this large file was destroyed, however. Somebody please prove me wrong as that would be fascinating. My Question: Looking back at it, how sure are you that your statement in the letter that ONI had "quite a file on Oswald" was accurate -- "absolutely sure," "very sure," or "less sure now than when I wrote the letter"? Cmdr. Steel's Answer: [BK had a blank here.] My February 2013 correction to BK: "He [Lt. Cmdr. Robert D. Steel, USN Reserves, Retired] said, 'ABSOLUTELY SURE!' It's on the tape, Bill!!! (I remember being surprised by Steel's answer because I was expecting him to say, "Not as sure now as I was when I wrote the letter.") --Tommy Tommy, Steel's admission that a file existed is ipso facto, an admission that it was destroyed. OK. Fine with me, Greg. --Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Trejo Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 (edited) Mission Statement (Tracy's blog) I believe the evidence shows that Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty of the crime of assassinating President John F. Kennedy. The goal of this website is to present articles and other information that will refute conspiracy theories and clarify facts. Just curious, Tracy -- but do you believe that Oswald might have had any accomplices? Regards, --Paul Trejo Edited July 20, 2015 by Paul Trejo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Tracy Parnell Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 Mission Statement (Tracy's blog) I believe the evidence shows that Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty of the crime of assassinating President John F. Kennedy. The goal of this website is to present articles and other information that will refute conspiracy theories and clarify facts.[/size] Just curious, Tracy -- but do you believe that Oswald might have had any accomplices? Regards, --Paul Trejo No. I believe that the 2017 file release will have to contain something big (as you think it will). But if there was a conspiracy, it did not involve 2 Oswalds as you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Trejo Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 (edited) Mission Statement (Tracy's blog) I believe the evidence shows that Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty of the crime of assassinating President John F. Kennedy. The goal of this website is to present articles and other information that will refute conspiracy theories and clarify facts. Just curious, Tracy -- but do you believe that Oswald might have had any accomplices? Regards, --Paul Trejo No. I believe that the 2017 file release will have to contain something big (as you think it will). But if there was a conspiracy, it did not involve 2 Oswalds as you know. Yes, Tracy, I agree with you fully that the "Harvey & Lee" theory is based on false Oswald sightings of various kinds, as well as on retouched photographs. Yet the evidence for a second shooter seems certain to me, based on the Zapruder film (despite minor changes) and the ballistics evidence (which was hidden from the public for so long). I expect to learn of a second shooter in 2017 -- possibly Roscoe White, possibly J.D. Tippit, possibly some Interpen member -- shooting from extremely close range -- possibly from the storm drain on Elm street, near the Grassy Knoll. I also expect to learn in 2017 that the FBI knew the full story of Guy Bannister in NOLA and General Walker in Dallas through 1963 -- so that Jim Garrison's JFK investigation will be again shown to have come closest to a true solution. Regards, --Paul Trejo Edited July 20, 2015 by Paul Trejo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 Tommy - thanks for posting your interview. It bothers me that Kelly, a researcher who I respect, chose to ignore your request to return the tape of your interview, and then according to your notes gets a few things wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Trejo Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 Tommy, Steel's admission that a file existed is ipso facto, an admission that it was destroyed. Another plausible explanation, Greg, is that this ONI file on Lee Harvey Oswald has been preserved in the record by the ARRB, and will be released on 26 October 2017 -- the ARRB deadline set by President GHW Bush when he signed the JFK Records Act of 1990. Regards, --Paul Trejo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts