Mark Gorton Posted May 6, 2013 Share Posted May 6, 2013 911 table.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Gorton Posted May 6, 2013 Author Share Posted May 6, 2013 Sorry about the poor image quality. I could not make tables work in the editor, so I used an image file. But I could not get the editor to show a high res version of the image. Please see the attached pdf to read a high quality version of the table. If anyone knows how to make this post look nicer, I would appreciate the help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted May 6, 2013 Share Posted May 6, 2013 This suffers the same fatal flaw as your previous thread starter, you failed to produce any evidence in support of your claims conclusions. I note that rather than defend the earlier post you simply started a new thread based on the same claims. Google pigeon posting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted May 11, 2013 Share Posted May 11, 2013 Image quality looks fine, IMO - easy to read. I have to agree with Len here, Mark. It is very subjective; I could easily produce a similar table that would say exactly the opposite of what this one says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now